Docket No. | Op. Below | Argument | Opinion | Vote | Author | Term |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
13-10639 | 11th Cir. | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | OT 2014 |
Issue: Whether the Court should overturn the Eleventh Circuit’s “appellate procedural default” rule, which categorically prohibits the Eleventh Circuit from considering the merits of issues not raised in an appellant’s opening brief – under any standard of review – and as applied in criminal cases contravenes the retroactivity principle of Griffith v. Kentucky, and conflicts with the rules applied in every other circuit (all of which accord at least some form of merits review, where as here, the new issue is raised for the first time on appeal).
Date | Proceedings and Orders |
---|---|
Jun 18 2014 | Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due July 21, 2014) |
Jul 18 2014 | Order extending time to file response to petition to and including August 20, 2014. |
Aug 1 2014 | Order further extending time to file response to petition to and including September 19, 2019. |
Sep 19 2014 | Brief of respondent United States in opposition filed. |
Oct 9 2014 | DISTRIBUTED for Conference of October 31, 2014. |
Nov 3 2014 | DISTRIBUTED for Conference of November 7, 2014. |
Nov 10 2014 | DISTRIBUTED for Conference of November 14, 2014. |
Nov 17 2014 | DISTRIBUTED for Conference of November 25, 2014. |
Dec 1 2014 | Petition DENIED Justice Kennedy and Justice Sotomayor would grant the petition for a writ of certiorari. Statement of Justice Kagan, with whom Justice Ginsburg and Justice Breyer join, respecting the denial of certiorari. (Detached Opinion) |
The Supreme Court sides with Sen. Ted Cruz in his First Amendment challenge to a federal campaign-finance law that limits how and when candidates can recoup loans that they make to their own campaigns. The vote is 6-3 along ideological lines.
In an immigration case, SCOTUS rules 5-4 that federal courts do NOT have jurisdiction to review certain executive-branch factual findings that determine whether non-citizens are eligible for "adjustment of status." Those findings can dictate whether a person is deported.
SCOTUS agrees to take up two new cases: Jones v. Hendrix (a habeas corpus case) and SEC v. Cochran (a case about the power of district courts to hear challenges to the constitutionality of the SEC's administrative law proceedings). Full order list here: https://www.supremecourt.gov/orders/courtorders/051622zor_hgcj.pdf
We're live now on SCOTUSblog's homepage or at https://www.scotusblog.com/2022/05/announcement-of-orders-and-opinions-for-monday-may-16/
Today at SCOTUS: The court will issue one or more opinions in argued cases at 10 a.m. EDT. But first, orders on pending petitions at 9:30. We'll fire up our live blog at 9:25 to break it all down and answer your questions. Grab some ☕️ and come join us: https://www.scotusblog.com/2022/05/announcement-of-orders-and-opinions-for-monday-may-16/
Today at SCOTUS: The court will issue one or more opinions in argued cases at 10 a.m. EDT. But first, orders on pending petitions at 9:30. We'll fire up our live blog at 9:25 to break it all down and answer your questions. Grab some ☕️ and come join us:
Announcement of orders and opinions for Monday, May 16 - SCOTUSblog
On Monday, May 16, we will be live blogging as the court releases orders from the May 12 conference and opinio...
www.scotusblog.com
We can announce, however, that we'll be liveblogging the release of orders from today's conference AND opinions, starting at around 9:25 @SCOTUSblog. Please join us to discuss the leak, pending opinions, and whatever other SCOTUS-related issues are on your mind. https://twitter.com/AHoweBlogger/status/1524788054434660353
#SCOTUS will release opinions from argued cases at 10 am on Monday. The Court does not announce in advance how many opinions it will release or which ones.