Docket No. | Argument | Opinion | Vote | Author | Term |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
12-117 | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | OT 2012 |
Issue: (1) Whether a state habeas petitioner who raises a freestanding actual-innocence claim under the Due Process Clause, and who demonstrates actual innocence by at least a preponderance of the evidence, must instead make that showing by clear and convincing evidence to warrant a new trial; and (2) whether, in light of trial counsel’s errors, petitioner received ineffective assistance of counsel in violation of Strickland v. Washington.
Date | Proceedings and Orders |
---|---|
Jul 24 2012 | Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due August 27, 2012) |
Aug 27 2012 | Brief amici curiae of Enrique Pena Nieto, et al. filed. |
Aug 27 2012 | Brief amicus curiae of The Innocence Network filed. |
Sep 12 2012 | DISTRIBUTED for Conference of October 5, 2012. |
Sep 18 2012 | Response Requested . (Due October 18, 2012) |
Oct 12 2012 | Order extending time to file response to petition to and including November 19, 2012. |
Oct 18 2012 | Brief amicus curiae of Dallas County District Attorney filed. |
Oct 18 2012 | Brief amicus curiae of Lucia Gaja filed. |
Oct 18 2012 | Brief amici curiae of Erwin Chemerinsky, et al. filed. |
Oct 19 2012 | Letter proposing a lodging received from counsel for amica curiae Lucia Gaja. |
Nov 19 2012 | Brief of respondent Texas in opposition filed. |
Dec 4 2012 | Reply of petitioner Rosa Estela Olvera Jimenez filed. |
Dec 5 2012 | DISTRIBUTED for Conference of January 4, 2013. |
Jan 7 2013 | Petition DENIED. |
Apparently all the action today at #SCOTUS was not limited to opinion announcements at 10 am. Major new cert. petition filed today challenging Harvard admissions policy. https://twitter.com/GregStohr/status/1364962610177843210
NEW: Supreme Court asked to outlaw race-based college admissions. Group challenging Harvard admissions policy says it files appeal asking court to over 2003 Grutter decision.
SCOTUS rules against a college student who tried to sue police officers after they mistook him for a criminal suspect and tackled/beat him. The unanimous ruling involves a technical interpretation of the "judgment bar" under the Federal Tort Claims Act. https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/20pdf/19-546_7mip.pdf
We're LIVE now. Opinions in 13 minutes. Come chat with us while we wait.
At 10:00 a.m. EST, the Supreme Court will hand down one or more opinions in argued cases.
We’ll be live blogging through it at 9:45 with @AHoweBlogger, Mark Walsh, and @jamesromoser.
Join us! https://www.scotusblog.com/2021/02/announcement-of-opinions-for-thursday-feb-25/
At 10:00 a.m. EST, the Supreme Court will hand down one or more opinions in argued cases.
We’ll be live blogging through it at 9:45 with @AHoweBlogger, Mark Walsh, and @jamesromoser.
Join us!
Announcement of opinions for Thursday, Feb. 25 - SCOTUSblog
We will be live blogging on Thursday, Feb. 25, as the court releases opinions from the 2020-21 term. This live ...
www.scotusblog.com
Will the Supreme Court make a bright-line rule allowing police officers to conduct warrantless home searches when in “hot pursuit” for a misdemeanor?
Read @AHoweBlogger’s takeaway from the oral argument today.
Justices hear argument on whether “hot pursuit” for misdemeanors allows police to enter home without a warrant - SCOTUSblog
The Supreme Court heard oral argument on Wednesday in the case of Arthur Lange, a northern California man convicte...
www.scotusblog.com
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.