Breaking News

Jackson v. Hudson

Petition for certiorari dismissed pursuant to Rule 46 on November 12, 2021
Docket No. Op. Below Argument Opinion Vote Author Term
21-347 10th Cir. N/A N/A N/A N/A OT 2021

Disclosure: Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys contribute to SCOTUSblog in various capacities, is counsel to the petitioner in this case.

Issue: Whether a federal prisoner is entitled to bring a habeas claim under the saving clause of 28 U.S.C. ยง 2255(e) to challenge the unlawful application of a mandatory minimum sentence, and imposition of a sentence that exceeded the proper statutory maximum, when his challenge was previously precluded by binding circuit precedent that has since been overruled by the circuit sitting en banc on the basis of an intervening decision of the Supreme Court.

DateProceedings and Orders (key to color coding)
Aug 31 2021Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due October 4, 2021)
Sep 30 2021Motion to extend the time to file a response from October 4, 2021 to November 3, 2021, submitted to The Clerk.
Oct 01 2021Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including November 3, 2021.
Oct 26 2021Motion to dismiss under Rule 46.2 filed.
Nov 12 2021Petition Dismissed - Rule 46.