Editor's Note :

close editor's note Editor's Note :

Click here for important resources on Amy Coney Barrett's nomination to the Supreme Court.
We're hosting a symposium on the Supreme Court's shadow docket. Click here to follow along.

Jack Daniel’s Properties Inc. v. VIP Products LLC

Pending petition
Docket No. Op. Below Argument Opinion Vote Author Term
20-365 9th Cir. TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD

Issues: (1) Whether a commercial product using humor is subject to the same likelihood-of-confusion analysis applicable to other products under the Lanham Act, or must receive heightened First Amendment protection from trademark-infringement claims, where the brand owner must prove that the defendant’s use of the mark either is “not artistically relevant” or “explicitly misleads consumers”; and (2) whether a commercial product’s use of humor renders the product “noncommercial” under 15 U.S.C. § 1125(c)(3)(C), thus barring as a matter of law a claim of dilution by tarnishment under the Lanham Act.

SCOTUSblog Coverage

DateProceedings and Orders (key to color coding)
Sep 15 2020Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due October 19, 2020)
Oct 07 2020Blanket Consent filed by Petitioner, Jack Daniel's Properties, Inc.
Oct 09 2020Motion to extend the time to file a response from October 19, 2020 to November 18, 2020, submitted to The Clerk.
Oct 13 2020Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including November 18, 2020.
Oct 19 2020Brief amicus curiae of Alcohol Beverage Industry Associations filed.
Oct 19 2020Brief amicus curiae of International Trademark Association filed.
Oct 19 2020Brief amicus curiae of The Intellectual Property Law Association of Chicago filed.
Oct 19 2020Brief amicus curiae of Campari America LLC filed.
Oct 19 2020Brief amicus curiae of Constellation Brands, Inc. filed.
Oct 19 2020Brief amicus curiae of Campbell Soup Company filed.
 
Share:
Term Snapshot
At a Glance
Awards