|Docket No.||Op. Below||Argument||Opinion||Vote||Author||Term|
|20-365||9th Cir.||N/A||N/A||N/A||N/A||OT 2020|
Issues: (1) Whether a commercial product using humor is subject to the same likelihood-of-confusion analysis applicable to other products under the Lanham Act, or must receive heightened First Amendment protection from trademark-infringement claims, where the brand owner must prove that the defendant’s use of the mark either is “not artistically relevant” or “explicitly misleads consumers”; and (2) whether a commercial product’s use of humor renders the product “noncommercial” under 15 U.S.C. § 1125(c)(3)(C), thus barring as a matter of law a claim of dilution by tarnishment under the Lanham Act.
|Date||Proceedings and Orders |
|Sep 15 2020||Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due October 19, 2020)|
|Oct 07 2020||Blanket Consent filed by Petitioner, Jack Daniel's Properties, Inc.|
|Oct 09 2020||Motion to extend the time to file a response from October 19, 2020 to November 18, 2020, submitted to The Clerk.|
|Oct 13 2020||Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including November 18, 2020.|
|Oct 19 2020||Brief amicus curiae of Alcohol Beverage Industry Associations filed.|
|Oct 19 2020||Brief amicus curiae of International Trademark Association filed.|
|Oct 19 2020||Brief amicus curiae of The Intellectual Property Law Association of Chicago filed.|
|Oct 19 2020||Brief amicus curiae of Campari America LLC filed.|
|Oct 19 2020||Brief amicus curiae of Constellation Brands, Inc. filed.|
|Oct 19 2020||Brief amicus curiae of Campbell Soup Company filed.|
|Nov 10 2020||Motion to extend the time to file a response from November 18, 2020 to December 18, 2020, submitted to The Clerk.|
|Nov 16 2020||Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted in part; the time is extended by agreement of the parties to and including December 16, 2020.|
|Dec 16 2020||Brief amicus curiae of Trademark Law Professors filed.|
|Dec 16 2020||Brief of respondent VIP Products LLC in opposition filed. (Distributed)|
|Dec 21 2020||Waiver of the 14-day waiting period for the distribution of the petition under 15.5 filed.|
|Dec 23 2020||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/8/2021.|
|Dec 23 2020||Reply of petitioner Jack Daniel's Properties, Inc. filed. (Distributed)|
|Jan 11 2021||Petition DENIED.|
Bribery or lobbying?
Percoco v. United States in a TikTok minute.
JUST IN: For the second time in the past week, SCOTUS denies an emergency request to block the execution of Kevin Johnson. The execution is scheduled for tonight in Missouri. Sonia Sotomayor and Ketanji Brown Jackson dissent from the brief order allowing the execution to proceed.
Today at SCOTUS: Can the federal government prioritize certain groups of unauthorized immigrants for deportation over others? And do states have standing to sue the government if they disagree with those priorities? @AHoweBlogger previews U.S. v. Texas:
In U.S. v. Texas, broad questions over immigration enforcement and states’ ability to challenge federal policies - SCOTUSblog
The Supreme Court will hear oral argument on Tuesday in a dispute over the Biden administration’s authority to...
Today at SCOTUS: The justices return to the bench for oral arguments in a pair of public-corruption cases, both stemming from scandals in New York politics that arose during Andrew Cuomo's time as governor. In both cases, the defendants are claiming prosecutorial overreach.
Cecilia (Cissy) Suyat Marshall, the widow of Thurgood Marshall, died this morning at 94. Here is the court's announcement.
BREAKING: The Supreme Court REJECTS Trump's bid to prevent the House Ways & Means Committee from obtaining his tax returns. No noted dissents.
The brief order may end years of litigation over the committee's efforts to review the tax records of Trump and his businesses.