|Docket No.||Op. Below||Argument||Opinion||Vote||Author||Term|
|15-486||5th Cir.||Not Argued||Oct 31, 2016||TBD||TBD||OT 2016|
Issue: Whether the Fifth Circuit erred in deciding that the relationship between public and private actors does not invoke dual obligations to accommodate disabilities in any context other than an express contractual relationship between a public entity and its private vendor. CVSG: 05/20/2016.
Judgment: Vacated and remanded with instructions to dismiss as moot on October 31, 2016.
|Date||Proceedings and Orders |
|Oct 14 2015||Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due November 16, 2015)|
|Oct 21 2015||Waiver of right of respondent Michael Williams to respond filed.|
|Nov 4 2015||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of November 24, 2015.|
|Nov 9 2015||Response Requested . (Due December 9, 2015)|
|Nov 23 2015||Order extending time to file response to petition to and including January 8, 2016.|
|Jan 7 2016||Order further extending time to file response to petition to and including January 22, 2016.|
|Jan 22 2016||Brief of respondent Mike Morath, Texas Commissioner of Education in opposition filed.|
|Feb 10 2016||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of February 26, 2016.|
|Feb 10 2016||Reply of petitioners Donnika Ivy, et al. filed. (Distributed)|
|Feb 29 2016||The Solicitor General is invited to file a brief in this case expressing the views of the United States.|
|May 20 2016||Brief amicus curiae of United States filed.|
|Jun 7 2016||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of June 23, 2016.|
|Jun 27 2016||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of June 27, 2016.|
|Jun 28 2016||Petition GRANTED.|
|Aug 5 2016||The time to file the joint appendix and petitioners' brief on the merits is extended to and including August 22, 2016.|
|Aug 5 2016||The time to file respondent's brief on the merits is extended to and including September 28, 2016.|
|Aug 17 2016||The time to file the joint appendix and petitioners' brief on the merits is further extended to and including August 23, 2016.|
|Aug 17 2016||The time to file respondent's brief on the merits is further extended to and including September 29, 2016.|
|Aug 23 2016||Joint appendix filed.|
|Aug 23 2016||Brief of petitioners Donnika Ivy, et al. filed.|
|Aug 24 2016||Consent to the filing of amicus curiae briefs, in support of either party or of neither party, received from counsel for the respondent.|
|Aug 26 2016||Consent to the filing of amicus curiae briefs, in support of either party or of neither party, received from counsel for the petitioner.|
|Aug 30 2016||Brief amici curiae of Law Professors filed.|
|Aug 30 2016||Brief amici curiae of Paralyzed Veterans of America, et al. filed.|
|Aug 30 2016||Brief amicus curiae of United States filed.|
|Aug 30 2016||Brief amici curiae of National Association of the Deaf, et al. filed.|
|Aug 30 2016||Brief amici curiae of The National Association of Counties, et al. filed.|
|Aug 30 2016||Brief amici curiae of Texas Business Women, Inc., et al. filed.|
|Sep 2 2016||SET FOR ARGUMENT On Monday, November 7, 2016|
|Sep 7 2016||Motion of the Acting Solicitor General for leave to participate in oral argument as amicus curiae and for divided argument filed.|
|Sep 9 2016||Record has been requested from the U.S.C.A. 5th Circuit.|
|Sep 9 2016||Record received from the U.S.D.C. Western Dist. of Texas is electronic.|
|Sep 28 2016||CIRCULATED|
|Sep 29 2016||Brief of respondent Mike Morath, Texas Commissioner of Education filed. (Distributed)|
|Oct 14 2016||This case is removed from the argument calendar for Monday, November 7, 2016.|
|Oct 26 2016||Reply of petitioners Donnika Ivy, et al. filed. (Distributed)|
|Oct 31 2016||Judgment VACATED and case REMANDED with instructions to dismiss the case as moot. See United States v. Munsingwear, Inc., 340 U. S. 36 (1950).|
|Dec 2 2016||JUDGMENT ISSUED.|
In yet another Friday night shadow docket order, a divided Supreme Court sides with challengers to California’s COVID-related restrictions. Brief per curiam opinion and dissent from Justice Kagan: https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/20pdf/20a151_4g15.pdf
By vote of 5-4, #SCOTUS blocks California's COVID-related restrictions on in-home prayer meetings and worship. Opinion & Kagan's dissent are here: https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/20pdf/20a151_4g15.pdf
President Biden will sign an executive order authorizing a commission to study Supreme Court reform. The commission will review “the length of service and turnover of justices on the court; the membership and size of the court” among other topics.
President Biden to Sign Executive Order Creating the Presidential Commission on the Supreme Court of the United States | The White House
President Biden will today issue an executive order forming the Presidential Commission on the Supreme Court of the United States, comprised of a
The Supreme Court will hear April and May oral arguments remotely but with a live audio feed.
#SCOTUS confirms that "[i]n keeping with public health guidance in response to COVID-19," it will hear oral arguments in April and on May 4 remotely, as it has for the other argument sessions this term. Press release here: https://www.scotusblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/04/Media-Advisory-Teleconference-Arguments.pdf
In a Monday evening shadow-docket filing, Tennessee asks the Supreme Court to reinstate a state law that imposes a 48-hour waiting period for patients to abortions. A federal judge struck down the waiting period as unconstitutional. @AHoweBlogger explains:
Tennessee asks court to restore waiting period for abortions - SCOTUSblog
Tennessee filed an emergency request with the Supreme Court on Monday, asking the justices for permission to enforce...
BREAKING: In major copyright battle between tech giants, SCOTUS sides w/ Google over Oracle, finding that Google didnt commit copyright infringement when it reused lines of code in its Android operating system. The code came from Oracle's JAVA SE platform. https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/20pdf/18-956_d18f.pdf
NEW: The Supreme Court agrees to take up one new case, Brown v. Davenport. It's a technical but important question about the standard for federal courts reviewing habeas claims to assess whether constitutional violations were "harmless error." https://www.supremecourt.gov/orders/courtorders/040521zor_3204.pdf
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.