|Docket No.||Op. Below||Argument||Opinion||Vote||Author||Term|
|12-928||D.C. Cir.||N/A||N/A||N/A||N/A||OT 2012|
Issue: (1) Whether the court failed to cure the violation of the Appointments Clause because, despite the judicial revision of 17 U.S.C. § 802(i) to permit the Librarian of Congress to fire Copyright Royalty Judges without cause, Copyright Royalty Judges are principal officers because they retain the power to render a final decision on behalf of the United States; and (2) whether, even if the court’s remedy demoted the judges, it failed to cure the constitutional violation because the Librarian of Congress is not the Head of an Executive Branch Department and thus may not appoint officers of the United States; and (3) whether, even if the remedy chosen by the court cured the constitutional defect, the court nevertheless should have let Congress select the appropriate remedy.
|Date||Proceedings and Orders |
|Nov 14 2012||Application (12A501) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from November 26, 2012 to December 26, 2012, submitted to The Chief Justice.|
|Nov 16 2012||Application (12A501) granted by The Chief Justice extending the time to file until December 26, 2012.|
|Dec 14 2012||Application (12A501) to extend further the time from December 26, 2012 to January 25, 2013, submitted to The Chief Justice.|
|Dec 17 2012||Application (12A501) granted by The Chief Justice extending the time to file until January 25, 2013.|
|Jan 25 2013||Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due February 25, 2013)|
|Jan 25 2013||Appendix of Intercollegiate Broadcasting System, Inc. filed.|
|Feb 4 2013||Order extending time to file response to petition to and including March 27, 2013, for all respondents.|
|Feb 25 2013||Brief amicus curiae of John F. Duffy filed.|
|Feb 25 2013||Brief amicus curiae of National Religious Broadcasters Music License Committee filed.|
|Mar 20 2013||Order further extending time to file response to petition to and including April 26, 2013, for all respondents.|
|Apr 26 2013||Brief of respondent Federal Respondents in opposition filed.|
|Apr 26 2013||Brief of respondent SoundExchange in opposition filed.|
|Apr 28 2013||Waiver of right of respondent College Broadcasters, Inc. to respond filed.|
|May 6 2013||Reply of petitioner Intercollegiate Broadcasting System, Inc. filed.|
|May 7 2013||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of May 23, 2013.|
|May 28 2013||Petition DENIED.|
Having covered the Supreme Court for six decades, @lylden has seen a lot of changes at 1 First Street. In the latest piece in our series on the post-COVID court, Lyle examines how the court's pandemic operations could spur permanent reform.
How has COVID-19 changed the Supreme Court? And are any of those changes worth keeping? Today we launch a symposium examining those questions.
First up, a piece from @stevenmazie on how to reform oral arguments after the pandemic.
The court after COVID: A recipe for oral argument reform - SCOTUSblog
The Supreme Court has not yet announced whether it will return to normal operations when the 2021-22 term begins ...
NEW shadow-docket case: New York landlords ask SCOTUS for an emergency order to prevent the state from continuing to enforce its COVID-related eviction moratorium. They say the moratorium "runs roughshod" over their constitutional rights.
Filing here: https://www.scotusblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/07/21A8-1.pdf
New on the shadow docket: Florida seeks an emergency order blocking CDC policies that substantially limit cruise ships from sailing.
Florida asks #SCOTUS to block, pending appeal, CDC restrictions imposed on cruise industry b/c of COVID-19 pandemic: https://www.scotusblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/07/21A5.pdf
NEW: Mississippi formally asks the Supreme Court to overturn its landmark abortion case, Roe v. Wade, in latest court filing. https://www.supremecourt.gov/DocketPDF/19/19-1392/184703/20210722161332385_19-1392BriefForPetitioners.pdf
Biden’s SCOTUS reform commission met yesterday and discussed several reform ideas including adding justices and adopting a formal code of ethics.
Term limits emerged as a popular idea. But how to implement it — via statute or constitutional amendment?
Term limits emerge as popular proposal at latest meeting of court-reform commission - SCOTUSblog
The Presidential Commission on the Supreme Court reconvened on Tuesday to hear from a new set of experts on vari...