|Docket No.||Op. Below||Argument||Opinion||Vote||Author||Term|
|18-1116||9th Cir.||Dec 4, 2019||Feb 26, 2020||9-0||Alito||OT 2019|
Holding: Under the requirement in the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 that plaintiffs with “actual knowledge” of an alleged fiduciary breach must file suit within three years of gaining that knowledge, a plaintiff does not necessarily have “actual knowledge” of the information contained in disclosures that he receives but does not read or cannot recall reading.
Judgment: Affirmed, 9-0, in an opinion by Justice Alito on February 26, 2020.
|Date||Proceedings and Orders |
|Feb 26 2019||Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due March 28, 2019)|
|Mar 18 2019||Motion to extend the time to file a response from March 28, 2019 to April 27, 2019, submitted to The Clerk.|
|Mar 21 2019||Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including April 29, 2019.|
|Mar 28 2019||Brief amici curiae of The National Association of Manufacturers, et al. filed.|
|Apr 29 2019||Brief of respondent Christopher M. Sulyma in opposition filed.|
|May 14 2019||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/30/2019.|
|May 14 2019||Reply of petitioners Intel Corporation Investment Policy Committee, et al. filed. (Distributed)|
|Jun 03 2019||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/6/2019.|
|Jun 10 2019||Petition GRANTED.|
|Jun 17 2019||Joint motion for an extension of time to file the briefs on the merits filed.|
|Jun 27 2019||Joint motion for an extension of time to file the briefs on the merits granted. The time to file the joint appendix and petitioners' brief on the merits is extended to and including August 21, 2019. The time to file respondent's brief on the merits is extended to and including October 21, 2019.|
|Aug 21 2019||Blanket Consent filed by Petitioner, Intel Corporation Investment Policy Committee, et al.|
|Aug 21 2019||Joint appendix (2 volumes) filed.|
|Aug 21 2019||Brief of petitioners Intel Corporation Investment Policy Committee, et al. filed.|
|Aug 28 2019||Brief amici curiae of The National Association of Manufacturers, et al. filed.|
|Sep 13 2019||SET FOR ARGUMENT on Wednesday, December 4, 2019.|
|Oct 21 2019||Brief of respondent Christopher M. Sulyma filed.|
|Oct 23 2019||Record requested from the U.S.C.A. 9th Circuit.|
|Oct 25 2019||CIRCULATED|
|Oct 28 2019||Brief amicus curiae of United States filed. (Distributed)|
|Oct 28 2019||Brief amici curiae of AARP and AARP Foundation filed. (Distributed)|
|Oct 28 2019||Motion of the Solicitor General for leave to participate in oral argument as amicus curiae and for divided argument filed.|
|Oct 28 2019||Amicus brief of The Pension Rights Center not accepted for filing (October 31, 2019). (Corrected brief submitted).|
|Oct 28 2019||Brief amicus curiae of The Pension Rights Center filed (October 29, 2019). (Distributed)|
|Nov 12 2019||Motion of the Solicitor General for leave to participate in oral argument as amicus curiae and for divided argument GRANTED.|
|Nov 20 2019||Reply of petitioners Intel Corporation Investment Policy Committee, et al. filed. (Distributed)|
|Dec 04 2019||Argued. For petitioners: Donald B. Verrilli, Jr., Washington, D. C. For respondent: Matthew W.H. Wessler, Washington, D. C.; and Matthew Guarnieri, Assistant to the Solicitor General, Department of Justice, Washington, D. C. (for United States, as amicus curiae.)|
|Feb 26 2020||Adjudged to be AFFIRMED. Alito, J., delivered the opinion for a unanimous Court.|
|Mar 30 2020||JUDGMENT ISSUED.|
NEW: SCOTUS agrees to take up two new cases. Here's the orders list. https://www.supremecourt.gov/orders/courtorders/030121zor_m6hn.pdf
#SCOTUS grants US v. Vaello-Madero, a challenge to exclusion of Puerto Rico residents from eligibility for Supplemental Social Security Income program, which provides benefits to poor disabled adults & children
Good morning. It’s Monday, and it’s March!
At 9:30 a.m. EST, SCOTUS will release orders from Friday’s conference.
At 10:00, the court will consider an appointments clause challenge to administrative patent judges. More from George Quillin & Jeanne Gills.
Justices to consider appointments clause challenge to administrative patent judges - SCOTUSblog
The justices continue their light load for the February argument session next week. First up is Monday’s Unite...
BREAKING: SCOTUS orders California’s Santa Clara County to allow churches to hold indoor services. Breyer, Sotomayor, and Kagan dissent. Here’s the short shadow docket order.
#SCOTUS grants emergency request from northern California churches to allow indoor worship services pending appeal, says result is "clearly dictated" by recent decision. Kagan dissents, joined by Breyer & Sotomayor: https://www.supremecourt.gov/orders/courtorders/022621zr_1bo2.pdf
Just in: SCOTUS opinions expected next Thursday.
#SCOTUS website indicates that the Court will release orders from today's conference on Monday morning, March 1, at 9:30 am, with opinions again on Thursday, March 4, at 10 am. Justices will also hear oral arguments next week, including in Arizona voting dispute on Tuesday.
Apparently all the action today at #SCOTUS was not limited to opinion announcements at 10 am. Major new cert. petition filed today challenging Harvard admissions policy. https://twitter.com/GregStohr/status/1364962610177843210
NEW: Supreme Court asked to outlaw race-based college admissions. Group challenging Harvard admissions policy says it files appeal asking court to over 2003 Grutter decision.
SCOTUS rules against a college student who tried to sue police officers after they mistook him for a criminal suspect and tackled/beat him. The unanimous ruling involves a technical interpretation of the "judgment bar" under the Federal Tort Claims Act. https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/20pdf/19-546_7mip.pdf
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.