Hueso v. Barnhart

Pending petition
Docket No. Op. Below Argument Opinion Vote Author Term
19-1365 6th Cir. TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD

Issue: Whether, notwithstanding the savings clause of 28 U.S.C. § 2255(e) – which allows a prisoner whose claim for postconviction relief is otherwise barred to petition for a writ of habeas corpus if the Section 2255 remedy is “inadequate or ineffective” to test the legality of his detention – an individual serving a wrongfully enhanced sentence is barred from obtaining relief, solely because the wrongfulness of the sentence was established retroactively by a court of appeals decision.

SCOTUSblog Coverage

DateProceedings and Orders (key to color coding)
Jun 08 2020Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due July 13, 2020)
Jul 07 2020Motion to extend the time to file a response from July 13, 2020 to August 12, 2020, submitted to The Clerk.
Jul 09 2020Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including August 12, 2020.
Jul 29 2020Motion to extend the time to file a response from August 12, 2020 to September 11, 2020, submitted to The Clerk.
Jul 30 2020Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is further extended to and including September 11, 2020.
Sep 11 2020Brief of respondent J. A. Barnhart, Warden in opposition filed.
Sep 17 2020Motion of Ramon Hueso for an extension of time submitted.
 
Share:
Term Snapshot
At a Glance
Awards