|Docket No.||Op. Below||Argument||Opinion||Vote||Author||Term|
|19-1058||Fed. Cir.||N/A||N/A||N/A||N/A||OT 2019|
Issue: Whether a patentee may recapture subject matter via the doctrine of equivalents under the “tangential relation” exception by arguing that it surrendered more than it needed to during prosecution to avoid a prior-art rejection, even if a claim could reasonably have been drafted that would literally have encompassed the alleged equivalent.
|Date||Proceedings and Orders |
|Jan 24 2020||Application (19A841) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from February 6, 2020 to February 24, 2020, submitted to The Chief Justice.|
|Jan 28 2020||Application (19A841) granted by The Chief Justice extending the time to file until February 24, 2020.|
|Feb 24 2020||Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due March 27, 2020)|
|Mar 10 2020||Motion to extend the time to file a response from March 27, 2020 to April 27, 2020, submitted to The Clerk.|
|Mar 11 2020||Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including April 27, 2020.|
|Mar 26 2020||Brief amicus curiae of R Street Institute filed. VIDED|
|Mar 26 2020||Brief amicus curiae of America's Health Insurance Plans filed.|
|Apr 27 2020||Brief of respondents Eli Lilly and Company in opposition filed. VIDED.|
|May 01 2020||Motion of petitioner to delay distribution of the petition for a writ of certiorari under Rule 15.5 from May 12, 2020 to May 26, 2020, submitted to The Clerk.|
|May 01 2020||Motion to delay distribution of the petition for a writ certiorari until May 26, 2020, granted.|
|May 26 2020||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/11/2020.|
|May 26 2020||Reply of petitioner Hospira, Inc. filed. (Distributed)|
|Jun 15 2020||Petition DENIED.|
It’s a quiet week, so now is a great time to listen to Judge John Owens regale @AHoweBlogger with the tale of Ashton Embry and the greatest leak in Supreme Court history.
Come for the high drama, stay for the good humor and an RBG story or two.
The biggest leak in Supreme Court history - SCOTUSblog
In a city full of anonymous sources, the Supreme Court is famously leak-proof. But a century ago, the court had ...
The US Supreme Court should overturn the Facebook’s “Oversight Board’s” “ruling” which upholds the outlawing of the 45th President of the United States from social media.
This is a big tech, corporate oligarchy without standing and it’s gone too far. Enough is enough.
The Supreme Court will hear its last case of the term today at 10:00 a.m. EDT.
Here’s a summary of Terry v. United States in a TikTok minute.
Tomorrow, the Supreme Court will tackle the legacy of the Reagan-era War on Drugs and Congress' attempt to reduce the punishment disparity between crack-cocaine and powder cocaine offenses.
As @ekownyankah notes, this case has a little bit of everything.
In final case the court will hear this term, profound issues of race, incarceration and the war on drugs - SCOTUSblog
Academics naturally believe that even obscure cases in their field are underappreciated; each minor tax or bankruptcy ...
JUST IN: Another shadow-docket filing in which a church argues that state COVID-related restrictions lack sufficient carveouts for religious worship. This one challenges Colorado's restrictions. It relies heavily on last month's ruling in Tandon v. Newsom.
Congratulations to Gail Curley, the new Marshal of the Supreme Court. The Marshal supervises the Court's police, cries in the Court with the familiar "Oyez," and (somewhat oddly) is responsible for paying the Justices' salaries. https://twitter.com/joshgerstein/status/1389212773108920323
JUST IN: If you’re the kind of person always expecting the Marshal of the Supreme Court to make an arrest, there’s a new sheriff in town #SCOTUS
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.