|Docket No.||Op. Below||Argument||Opinion||Vote||Author||Term|
|12-123||9th Cir.||Mar 20, 2013||Jun 10, 2013||9-0||Thomas||OT 2012|
Holding: A farmer who is deemed to have violated an agricultural marketing order, is fined, has a fine assessed against him, and seeks to argue that the fine is an unconstitutional “taking” can bring his “takings” claim in a regular federal district court without first paying the fine; he is not required to bring that claim in the Court of Federal Claims.
Judgment: Reversed and remanded, 9-0, in an opinion by Justice Thomas on June 10, 2013.
|Date||Proceedings and Orders |
|Feb 4 2012||Administrative record from U.S. Dept. of Justice is electronic.|
|May 29 2012||Application (11A1125) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from June 10, 2012 to August 9, 2012, submitted to Justice Kennedy.|
|Jun 1 2012||Application (11A1125) granted by Justice Kennedy extending the time to file until July 25, 2012.|
|Jul 25 2012||Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due August 27, 2012)|
|Aug 21 2012||Order extending time to file response to petition to and including September 26, 2012.|
|Aug 27 2012||Brief amici curiae of Cato Institute, et al. filed.|
|Sep 19 2012||Order further extending time to file response to petition to and including October 26, 2012.|
|Oct 26 2012||Brief of respondent Department of Agriculture in opposition filed.|
|Nov 5 2012||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of November 20, 2012.|
|Nov 5 2012||Reply of petitioners Marvin D. Horne, et al. filed. (Distributed)|
|Nov 20 2012||Petition GRANTED.|
|Dec 21 2012||The time to file the joint appendix and petitioners' brief on the merits is extended to and including January 9, 2013.|
|Dec 21 2012||The time to file respondent's brief on the merits is extended to and including February 12, 2013.|
|Jan 7 2013||SET FOR ARGUMENT ON Wednesday, March 20, 2013|
|Jan 9 2013||Brief of petitioners Marvin D. Horne, et al. filed.|
|Jan 9 2013||Joint appendix filed. (Statement of costs received)|
|Jan 16 2013||Brief amici curiae of Cato Institute, et al. filed.|
|Jan 16 2013||Brief amicus curiae of Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America filed.|
|Jan 16 2013||Brief amici curiae of Constitutional Law Scholars filed.|
|Jan 16 2013||Brief amicus curiae of Texas filed.|
|Jan 18 2013||Record from U.S.C.A. for 9th Circuit is electronic.|
|Jan 18 2013||Record from U.S.D.C. for Eastern Districtof California (Fresno) is electronic.|
|Jan 23 2013||CIRCULATED.|
|Feb 4 2013||Administrative record from U.S. Dept. of Justice is electronic.|
|Feb 12 2013||Brief of respondent Department of Agriculture filed. (Distributed)|
|Feb 19 2013||Brief amicus curiae of International Municipal Lawyers Association filed. (Distributed)|
|Feb 19 2013||Brief amicus curiae of Sun-Maid Growers of California filed. (Distributed)|
|Mar 13 2013||Reply of petitioners Marvin D. Horne, et al. filed. (Distributed)|
|Mar 20 2013||Argued. For petitioners: Michael W. McConnell, Washington, D. C. For respondent: Joseph R. Palmore, Assistant to the Solicitor General, Department of Justice, Washington, D. C.|
|Jun 10 2013||Judgment REVERSED and case REMANDED. Thomas, J., delivered the opinion for a unanimous Court.|
|Jul 12 2013||JUDGMENT ISSUED.|
Having covered the Supreme Court for six decades, @lylden has seen a lot of changes at 1 First Street. In the latest piece in our series on the post-COVID court, Lyle examines how the court's pandemic operations could spur permanent reform.
How has COVID-19 changed the Supreme Court? And are any of those changes worth keeping? Today we launch a symposium examining those questions.
First up, a piece from @stevenmazie on how to reform oral arguments after the pandemic.
The court after COVID: A recipe for oral argument reform - SCOTUSblog
The Supreme Court has not yet announced whether it will return to normal operations when the 2021-22 term begins ...
NEW shadow-docket case: New York landlords ask SCOTUS for an emergency order to prevent the state from continuing to enforce its COVID-related eviction moratorium. They say the moratorium "runs roughshod" over their constitutional rights.
Filing here: https://www.scotusblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/07/21A8-1.pdf
New on the shadow docket: Florida seeks an emergency order blocking CDC policies that substantially limit cruise ships from sailing.
Florida asks #SCOTUS to block, pending appeal, CDC restrictions imposed on cruise industry b/c of COVID-19 pandemic: https://www.scotusblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/07/21A5.pdf
NEW: Mississippi formally asks the Supreme Court to overturn its landmark abortion case, Roe v. Wade, in latest court filing. https://www.supremecourt.gov/DocketPDF/19/19-1392/184703/20210722161332385_19-1392BriefForPetitioners.pdf
Biden’s SCOTUS reform commission met yesterday and discussed several reform ideas including adding justices and adopting a formal code of ethics.
Term limits emerged as a popular idea. But how to implement it — via statute or constitutional amendment?
Term limits emerge as popular proposal at latest meeting of court-reform commission - SCOTUSblog
The Presidential Commission on the Supreme Court reconvened on Tuesday to hear from a new set of experts on vari...