Hester v. United States
Petition for certiorari denied on January 7, 2019
Issue: Whether the rule of Apprendi v. New Jersey–which held that any fact, other than a prior conviction, that increases the penalty for a crime beyond the prescribed statutory maximum must be submitted to a jury and proven beyond a reasonable doubt–should apply to the imposition of criminal restitution.
Date | Proceedings and Orders (key to color coding) |
---|
May 21 2018 | Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due June 25, 2018) |
Jun 04 2018 | Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed. |
Jun 14 2018 | DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/24/2018. |
Jul 13 2018 | Response Requested. (Due August 13, 2018) |
Aug 08 2018 | Motion to extend the time to file a response from August 13, 2018 to September 12, 2018, submitted to The Clerk. |
Aug 09 2018 | Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including September 12, 2018. |
Sep 04 2018 | Motion to extend the time to file a response from September 12, 2018 to October 12, 2018, submitted to The Clerk. |
Sep 05 2018 | Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is further extended to and including October 12, 2018. |
Oct 12 2018 | Brief of respondent United States in opposition filed. |
Oct 17 2018 | Reply of petitioners Marco Luis, et al. filed. |
Oct 25 2018 | DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/9/2018. |
Nov 06 2018 | Rescheduled. |
Nov 13 2018 | DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/16/2018. |
Nov 26 2018 | DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/30/2018. |
Dec 03 2018 | DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 12/7/2018. |
Dec 20 2018 | DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/4/2019. |
Jan 07 2019 | Petition DENIED. Justice Alito, concurring in the denial of certiorari. Justice Gorsuch, with whom Justice Sotomayor joins, dissenting from the denial of certiorari. (Detached Opinion) |