|Docket No.||Op. Below||Argument||Opinion||Vote||Author||Term|
|17-9082||9th Cir.||N/A||N/A||N/A||N/A||OT 2018|
Issue: Whether the rule of Apprendi v. New Jersey–which held that any fact, other than a prior conviction, that increases the penalty for a crime beyond the prescribed statutory maximum must be submitted to a jury and proven beyond a reasonable doubt–should apply to the imposition of criminal restitution.
|Date||Proceedings and Orders |
|May 21 2018||Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due June 25, 2018)|
|Jun 04 2018||Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.|
|Jun 14 2018||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/24/2018.|
|Jul 13 2018||Response Requested. (Due August 13, 2018)|
|Aug 08 2018||Motion to extend the time to file a response from August 13, 2018 to September 12, 2018, submitted to The Clerk.|
|Aug 09 2018||Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including September 12, 2018.|
|Sep 04 2018||Motion to extend the time to file a response from September 12, 2018 to October 12, 2018, submitted to The Clerk.|
|Sep 05 2018||Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is further extended to and including October 12, 2018.|
|Oct 12 2018||Brief of respondent United States in opposition filed.|
|Oct 17 2018||Reply of petitioners Marco Luis, et al. filed.|
|Oct 25 2018||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/9/2018.|
|Nov 06 2018||Rescheduled.|
|Nov 13 2018||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/16/2018.|
|Nov 26 2018||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/30/2018.|
|Dec 03 2018||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 12/7/2018.|
|Dec 20 2018||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/4/2019.|
|Jan 07 2019||Petition DENIED. Justice Alito, concurring in the denial of certiorari. Justice Gorsuch, with whom Justice Sotomayor joins, dissenting from the denial of certiorari. (Detached Opinion)|
#SCOTUS does not take up 2nd question in the case, on whether to overrule its 2020 decision in McGirt v. Oklahoma. Full order is here: https://www.supremecourt.gov/orders/courtorders/012122zr_3f14.pdf https://twitter.com/AHoweBlogger/status/1484606315519516675
#SCOTUS grants one new case, sets it for argument in April: Oklahoma v. Castro-Huerta, on whether a state has authority to prosecute non-Indians who commit crimes against Indians in Indian country.
More opinions coming on Monday.
#SCOTUS website indicates that the Court is expected to release more opinions on Monday morning at 10 am.
The next #SCOTUS grants? Kevin McCarthy v. Nancy Pelosi in a fight over congressional proxy voting; the First Amendment-based ministerial exception to employment law returns; nondelegation doctrine (!); and the constitutionality of the FTC's structure.
Revenge of the rescheduled cases: Congressional proxy voting, the ministerial exception, and more - SCOTUSblog
The Relist Watch column examines cert petitions that the Supreme Court has “relisted” for its upcoming con...
JUST IN: The Supreme Court, over dissents from the three liberal justices, rejects a request from Texas abortion clinics to immediately return the litigation over Texas' six-week abortion law to a federal district court.
The Supreme Court issues a single opinion today, ruling in an 8-1 vote that a criminal defendant's rights were violated under the Sixth Amendment's confrontation clause when the government introduced a plea allocution from another proceeding. https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/21pdf/20-637_10n2.pdf
Today at SCOTUS: We expect one or more opinions in argued cases to be issued starting at 10 a.m. EST. At 9:45, we'll fire up our live blog, where we'll also chat about this week's arguments and last night's ruling on Trump records. Grab your ☕️ & join us!
Announcement of opinions for Thursday, Jan. 20 - SCOTUSblog
On Thursday, January 20, we will be live blogging as the court releases opinions in one or more argued cases f...