Hana Financial, Inc. v. Hana Bank

Docket No.	Op. Below	Argument	Opinion	Vote	Author	Term
13-1211	9th Cir.	Dec 3, 2014 Tr.Aud.	Jan 21, 2015	9-0	Sotomayor	OT 2014

Holding: The jury, rather than a court, determines whether the use of an older trademark may be tacked to a newer one.

Judgment: Affirmed, 9-0, in an opinion by Justice Sotomayor on January 21, 2015.

SCOTUSblog Coverage

Opinion analysis: Justices, yet again, remind courts of appeals of importance of juries in IP cases (Ronald Mann)
Argument analysis: Justices coast through argument on trademark “tacking” (Ronald Mann)
Argument preview: Justices will use rare look at trademark law to consider broad and narrow conceptions of trademarks (Ronald Mann)

Date	Proceedings and Orders (key to color coding)
Feb 4 2014	Application (13A805) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from February 20, 2014 to April 21, 2014, submitted to Justice Kennedy.
Feb 7 2014	Application (13A805) granted by Justice Kennedy extending the time to file until April 7, 2014.
Apr 7 2014	Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due May 8, 2014)
May 8 2014	Brief of respondents Hana Bank, et al. in opposition filed.
May 27 2014	DISTRIBUTED for Conference of June 12, 2014.
May 28 2014	Reply of petitioner Hana Financial, Inc. filed. (Distributed)
Jun 16 2014	DISTRIBUTED for Conference of June 19, 2014.
Jun 23 2014	Petition GRANTED.
Jul 23 2014	The time to file the joint appendix and petitioner's brief on the merits is extended to and including August 28, 2014.
Jul 23 2014	The time to file respondents' brief on the merits is extended to and including October 20, 2014.
Aug 28 2014	Joint appendix filed. (Statement of costs filed.)
Aug 28 2014	Brief of petitioner Hana Financial, Inc. filed.
Sep 4 2014	SET FOR ARGUMENT on Wednesday, December 3, 2014.
Sep 4 2014	Brief amicus curiae of American Intellectual Property Law Association in support of neither party filed.
Sep 22 2014	Record requested from U.S.C.A. 9th Circuit.
Sep 24 2014	Record received from U.S.C.A. 9th Circuit is electronic and located on PACER.
Sep 24 2014	Record received from U.S.D.C. Central Dist. of CA. The record is electronic and located on PACER.
Oct 1 2014	Record received from U.S.D.C. Central Dist. of CA. 1 Box. Part of this record is SEALED.
Oct 20 2014	Brief of respondents Hana Bank, et al. filed.
Oct 27 2014	CIRCULATED.
Oct 27 2014	Brief amicus curiae of the United States filed. (Distributed)
Oct 27 2014	Motion of the Solicitor General for leave to participate in oral argument as amicus curiae and for divided argument filed.
Oct 27 2014	Brief amicus curiae of International Trademark Association filed. (Distributed)
Nov 17 2014	Motion of the Solicitor General for leave to participate in oral argument as amicus curiae and for divided argument GRANTED.
Nov 19 2014	Reply of petitioner Hana Financial, Inc. filed. (Distributed)
Dec 3 2014	Argued. For petitioner: Paul W. Hughes, Washington, D. C. For respondents: Carlo F. Van den Bosch, Costa Mesa, Cal.; and Sarah E. Harrington, Assistant to the Solicitor General, Department of Justice, Washington, D. C. (for United States, as amicus curiae.)
Jan 21 2015	Adjudged to be AFFIRMED. Sotomayor, J., delivered the opinion for a unanimous Court.
Feb 23 2015	JUDGMENT ISSUED.
Feb 27 2015	Record returned to U.S.D.C. Central District of California Western Division. (1-Box)

Featured Posts

Retired Justice John Paul Stevens has died – Amy Howe

Battle over border wall comes to the court – Amy Howe

Trump administration ends effort to include citizenship question on 2020 census – Amy Howe
Sponsored by Casetext
SCOTUStalk see all
Email Digest Sign-Up
Receive a daily email digest from Feedburner by entering your email.
Merits Case Pages and Archives

Archives

or

This Week at the Court
The justices are on their summer recess.
Major Cases
- Department of Commerce v. New York
  The secretary of the Department of Commerce did not violate the enumeration clause or the Census Act in deciding to reinstate a citizenship question on the 2020 census questionnaire, but the district court was warranted in remanding the case back to the agency where the evidence tells a story that does not match the secretary’s explanation for his decision.
- Kisor v. Wilkie
  Auer v. Robbins and Bowles v. Seminole Rock & Sand Co – under which deference is given to an agency’s reasonable reading of its own genuinely ambiguous regulations – are not overruled.
- Rucho v. Common Cause
  Partisan gerrymandering claims present political questions beyond the reach of the federal courts.
- The American Legion v. American Humanist Association
  The Bladensburg Cross does not violate the establishment clause of the First Amendment.
- Gamble v. United States
  The dual-sovereignty doctrine – under which two offenses are not the “same offence” for double jeopardy purposes if prosecuted by separate sovereigns – is upheld.
see all this term’s cases »
Recent Decisions
- Lamone v. Benisek Partisan gerrymandering claims present political questions beyond the reach of the federal courts.
- Department of Commerce v. New York The secretary of the Department of Commerce did not violate the enumeration clause or the Census Act in deciding to reinstate a citizenship question on the 2020 census questionnaire, but the district court was warranted in remanding the case back to the agency where the evidence tells a story that does not match the secretary’s explanation for his decision.
- Mitchell v. Wisconsin The Wisconsin Supreme Court’s judgment – affirming the drunk-driving convictions of Gerald Mitchell, who was administered a warrantless blood test while he was unconscious – is vacated, and the case is remanded.
- Rucho v. Common Cause Partisan gerrymandering claims present political questions beyond the reach of the federal courts.
- Kisor v. Wilkie Auer v. Robbins and Bowles v. Seminole Rock & Sand Co – under which deference is given to an agency’s reasonable reading of its own genuinely ambiguous regulations – are not overruled.
- Tennessee Wine & Spirits Retailers Association v. Thomas Tennessee’s 2-year durational-residency requirement applicable to retail liquor store license applicants violates the commerce clause and is not saved by the 21st Amendment.
- United States v. Haymond The U.S. Court of Appeals for the 10th Circuit’s judgment – that 18 U. S. C. §3583(k)’s last two sentences are unconstitutional and unenforceable – is vacated, and the case is remanded.
- Food Marketing Institute v. Argus Leader Media Where commercial or financial information is both customarily and actually treated as private by its owner and provided to the government under an assurance of privacy, the information is “confidential” within the meaning of 5 U. S. C. §552(b)(4), the Freedom of Information Act’s Exemption 4.
- Iancu v. Brunetti The Lanham Act prohibition on the registration of “immoral” or “scandalous” trademarks infringes the First Amendment.
- The Dutra Group v. Batterton A plaintiff may not recover punitive damages on a maritime claim of unseaworthiness.
- United States v. Davis Title 18 U. S. C. §924(c)(3)(B), which provides enhanced penalties for using a firearm during a “crime of violence,” is unconstitutionally vague.
see all this term’s cases »
Current Relists
Recent Special Features
Statistical Snapshot

Cases argued 70

Cases decided 67

Summary reversals 5

Merits cases granted to date 74

see all »
Live Blog Archives
See all
Twitter Feed

Tweets by @SCOTUSblog

Majority Opinions by Author
Voting Breakdown Argued Cases

Calendar: July 2019
Full Calendar Submit Event

July 2019

Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa

1

2

3

4
Holiday

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31
- Orders/Opinions
- Arguments
- Conferences
- Events
- Holidays
- Multiple

Su	Mo	Tu	We	Th	Fr	Sa
	1	2	3	4 Holiday	5	6
7	8	9	10	11	12	13
14	15	16	17	18	19	20
21	22	23	24	25	26	27
28	29	30	31

Download our App in the Apple Store
Videos see all

Justice Thomas at the Supreme Court Historical Society

On June 3, Justice Clarence Thomas spoke with David Rubenstein for the Supreme Court Historical Society’s annual lecture at the Supreme Court.

Peabody Award
Awarded the Peabody Award for excellence in electronic media.
Sigma Delta Chi
Awarded the Sigma Delta Chi deadline reporting award for online coverage of the Affordable Care Act decision.
National Press Club Award
Awarded the National Press Club's Breaking News Award for coverage of the Affordable Care Act decision.
Silver Gavel Award
Awarded the Silver Gavel Award by the American Bar Association for fostering the American public’s understanding of the law and the legal system.
American Gavel Award
Awarded the American Gavel Award for Distinguished Reporting About the Judiciary to recognize the highest standards of reporting about courts and the justice system.
Webby Award
Awarded the Webby Award for excellence on the internet.

Cases argued	70
Cases decided	67
Summary reversals	5
Merits cases granted to date	74

Hana Financial, Inc. v. Hana Bank

SCOTUSblog Coverage

Featured Posts

Retired Justice John Paul Stevens has died – Amy Howe

Battle over border wall comes to the court – Amy Howe

Trump administration ends effort to include citizenship question on 2020 census – Amy Howe

Sponsored by Casetext

SCOTUStalk see all

Email Digest Sign-Up

Merits Case Pages and Archives

This Week at the Court

Major Cases

Recent Decisions

Current Relists

Recent Special Features

Statistical Snapshot

Live Blog Archives

Twitter Feed

Majority Opinions by Author

Voting Breakdown Argued Cases

Calendar: July 2019

July 2019

Holiday

Download our App in the Apple Store

Videos see all

Peabody Award

Sigma Delta Chi

National Press Club Award

Silver Gavel Award

American Gavel Award

Webby Award