|Docket No.||Op. Below||Argument||Opinion||Vote||Author||Term|
|19-296||D.C. Cir.||N/A||N/A||N/A||N/A||OT 2019|
Issues: (1) Whether deference under Chevron U.S.A. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, rather than the rule of lenity, takes precedence in the interpretation of statutory language defining an element of various crimes when such language also has administrative applications; (2) whether, if Chevron deference applies and takes priority over the rule of lenity, such deference can be waived in the course of litigation and on appeal; and (3) whether, if Chevron deference applies and cannot be waived, Chevron should be overruled.
|Date||Proceedings and Orders |
|Jun 18 2019||Application (18A1352) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from June 30, 2019 to August 29, 2019, submitted to The Chief Justice.|
|Jun 24 2019||Application (18A1352) granted by The Chief Justice extending the time to file until August 29, 2019.|
|Aug 29 2019||Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due October 4, 2019)|
|Sep 13 2019||Blanket Consent filed by Petitioner, Damien Guedes, et al.|
|Sep 24 2019||Motion to extend the time to file a response from October 4, 2019 to November 4, 2019, submitted to The Clerk.|
|Sep 25 2019||Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including November 4, 2019.|
|Oct 02 2019||Brief amicus curiae of Firearms Policy Coalition filed.|
|Oct 02 2019||Brief amici curiae of NFA Freedom Alliance, Inc., California Gun Rights Foundation, and Arizona Citizens Defense League filed.|
|Oct 03 2019||Brief amicus curiae of Center for Constitutional Jurisprudence filed.|
|Oct 03 2019||Brief amicus curiae of The Cato Institute filed.|
|Oct 03 2019||Brief amici curiae of Due Process Institute filed.|
|Oct 03 2019||Brief amicus curiae of National Right to Work Legal Defense Foundation, Inc. filed.|
|Oct 04 2019||Brief amicus curiae of New Civil Liberties Alliance filed.|
|Oct 31 2019||Motion to extend the time to file a response from November 4, 2019 to December 4, 2019, submitted to The Clerk.|
|Nov 04 2019||Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is further extended to and including December 4, 2019.|
|Dec 04 2019||Brief of respondents Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives, et al. in opposition filed.|
|Dec 18 2019||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/10/2020.|
|Dec 19 2019||Reply of petitioners Damien Guedes, et al. filed.|
|Jan 13 2020||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/17/2020.|
|Jan 21 2020||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/24/2020.|
|Feb 14 2020||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/21/2020.|
|Feb 24 2020||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/28/2020.|
|Mar 02 2020||Petition DENIED. Statement of Justice Gorsuch. (Detached Opinion)|
The clerk of the court just notified counsel in a juvenile sentencing case—that was sent back to a lower court this week in light of the court's decision in Jones v. Mississippi—that Justice Kagan unwittingly failed to recuse herself after participating in part of the case as SG.
It’s a quiet week, so now is a great time to listen to Judge John Owens regale @AHoweBlogger with the tale of Ashton Embry and the greatest leak in Supreme Court history.
Come for the high drama, stay for the good humor and an RBG story or two.
The biggest leak in Supreme Court history - SCOTUSblog
In a city full of anonymous sources, the Supreme Court is famously leak-proof. But a century ago, the court had ...
The US Supreme Court should overturn the Facebook’s “Oversight Board’s” “ruling” which upholds the outlawing of the 45th President of the United States from social media.
This is a big tech, corporate oligarchy without standing and it’s gone too far. Enough is enough.
The Supreme Court will hear its last case of the term today at 10:00 a.m. EDT.
Here’s a summary of Terry v. United States in a TikTok minute.
Tomorrow, the Supreme Court will tackle the legacy of the Reagan-era War on Drugs and Congress' attempt to reduce the punishment disparity between crack-cocaine and powder cocaine offenses.
As @ekownyankah notes, this case has a little bit of everything.
In final case the court will hear this term, profound issues of race, incarceration and the war on drugs - SCOTUSblog
Academics naturally believe that even obscure cases in their field are underappreciated; each minor tax or bankruptcy ...
JUST IN: Another shadow-docket filing in which a church argues that state COVID-related restrictions lack sufficient carveouts for religious worship. This one challenges Colorado's restrictions. It relies heavily on last month's ruling in Tandon v. Newsom.
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.