Editor's Note :

close editor's note Editor's Note :

We're currently hosting a symposium on Tuesday's decision in Espinoza v. Montana Department of Revenue. Click to follow along.
We also hosted a symposium on Monday's decision in June Medical Services v. Russo. Click to read the submissions.

Briefly Mentioned :

Briefly Noted :

On Thursday, the court released orders from the July 1 conference. The justices granted five cases for a total of four hours of oral argument next term.
On Monday, we expect the court to release opinions at 10 a.m. We will be live-blogging starting at 9:20 a.m. at this link, where you can sign up for an email reminder when the live blog begins.

Giles v. California

Docket No. Op. Below Argument Opinion Vote Author Term
07-6053 Cal. S.Ct. Apr 22, 2008
Tr.Aud.
Jun 25, 2008 6-3 Scalia OT 2007

Holding: The California Supreme Court's theory of forfeiture by wrongdoing is not an exception to the Sixth Amendment's confrontation requirement because it was not an exception established at the founding.

Judgment: Vacated and remanded, 6-3, in an opinion by Justice Antonin Scalia on June 25, 2008. Justice Scalia delivered the opinion of the Supreme Court, except as to Part II-D-2. Chief Justice Roberts and Justices Thomas and Alito joined that opinion in full, and Justices Souter and Ginsburg joined as to all but Part II-D-2. Justice Thomas and Justice Alito filed concurring opinions. Justice Souter filed an opinion concurring in part, in which Justice Ginsburg joined. Justice Breyer filed a dissenting opinion, in which Justices Steven and Kennedy joined.

SCOTUSblog Coverage

Briefs and Documents

Merit briefs (via ABA)

Amicus briefs

 
Share:
Term Snapshot
At a Glance
Awards