|Docket No.||Op. Below||Argument||Opinion||Vote||Author||Term|
|17-936||9th Cir.||N/A||N/A||N/A||N/A||OT 2018|
Disclosure: Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys contribute to this blog in various capacities, is among the counsel to the respondent in this case.
Issue: Whether a False Claims Act allegation fails when the government continued to approve and to pay for products after learning of alleged regulatory infractions and the pleadings offer no basis for overcoming the strong inference of immateriality that arises from the government's response. CVSG: 11/30/2018.
|Date||Proceedings and Orders |
|Dec 26 2017||Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due February 2, 2018)|
|Jan 16 2018||Blanket Consent filed by counsel for both Petitioner, Gilead Sciences, Inc. and Respondents Jeffrey Campie and Sherilyn Campie.|
|Jan 22 2018||Motion to extend the time to file a response from February 2, 2018 to March 5, 2018, submitted to The Clerk.|
|Jan 26 2018||Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including March 5, 2018.|
|Feb 01 2018||Brief amici curiae of Chamber of Commerce for the United States of America, et al. filed.|
|Feb 02 2018||Brief amicus curiae of Coalition for Government Procurement filed.|
|Feb 02 2018||Brief amicus curiae of ConocoPhillips Company filed.|
|Feb 02 2018||Brief amici curiae of Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America; Biotechnology Innovation Organization filed.|
|Feb 02 2018||Brief amicus curiae of CTIA - The Wireless Association filed.|
|Feb 02 2018||Brief amicus curiae of Washington Legal Foundation filed.|
|Mar 05 2018||Brief of respondents Jeffrey Campie, et al. in opposition filed.|
|Mar 20 2018||Reply of petitioner Gilead Sciences, Inc. filed. (Distributed)|
|Mar 21 2018||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/13/2018.|
|Apr 16 2018||The Solicitor General is invited to file a brief in this case expressing the views of the United States.|
|Nov 30 2018||Brief amicus curiae of United States of America filed.|
|Dec 19 2018||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/4/2019.|
|Dec 19 2018||Supplemental brief of respondents Jeffrey Campie, et al. filed. (Distributed)|
|Jan 07 2019||Petition DENIED.|
We've reached the final round of SCOTUS bracketology, and two illustrious chief justices are facing off for the championship. One wrote Marbury v. Madison. The other wrote Brown v. Board. Our full write-up on both finalists is here:
Cast your vote below!
The “great chief” and the “super chief”: A final showdown in Supreme Court March Madness - SCOTUSblog
Forget Ali vs. Frazier, Celtics vs. Lakers, or Evert vs. Navratilova. It’s time for Marshall vs. Warren. After...
In yet another Friday night shadow docket order, a divided Supreme Court sides with challengers to California’s COVID-related restrictions. Brief per curiam opinion and dissent from Justice Kagan: https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/20pdf/20a151_4g15.pdf
By vote of 5-4, #SCOTUS blocks California's COVID-related restrictions on in-home prayer meetings and worship. Opinion & Kagan's dissent are here: https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/20pdf/20a151_4g15.pdf
President Biden will sign an executive order authorizing a commission to study Supreme Court reform. The commission will review “the length of service and turnover of justices on the court; the membership and size of the court” among other topics.
President Biden to Sign Executive Order Creating the Presidential Commission on the Supreme Court of the United States | The White House
President Biden will today issue an executive order forming the Presidential Commission on the Supreme Court of the United States, comprised of a
The Supreme Court will hear April and May oral arguments remotely but with a live audio feed.
#SCOTUS confirms that "[i]n keeping with public health guidance in response to COVID-19," it will hear oral arguments in April and on May 4 remotely, as it has for the other argument sessions this term. Press release here: https://www.scotusblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/04/Media-Advisory-Teleconference-Arguments.pdf
In a Monday evening shadow-docket filing, Tennessee asks the Supreme Court to reinstate a state law that imposes a 48-hour waiting period for patients to abortions. A federal judge struck down the waiting period as unconstitutional. @AHoweBlogger explains:
Tennessee asks court to restore waiting period for abortions - SCOTUSblog
Tennessee filed an emergency request with the Supreme Court on Monday, asking the justices for permission to enforce...
BREAKING: In major copyright battle between tech giants, SCOTUS sides w/ Google over Oracle, finding that Google didnt commit copyright infringement when it reused lines of code in its Android operating system. The code came from Oracle's JAVA SE platform. https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/20pdf/18-956_d18f.pdf
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.