|Docket No.||Op. Below||Argument||Opinion||Vote||Author||Term|
|17-936||9th Cir.||N/A||N/A||N/A||N/A||OT 2018|
Disclosure: Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys contribute to this blog in various capacities, is among the counsel to the respondent in this case.
Issue: Whether a False Claims Act allegation fails when the government continued to approve and to pay for products after learning of alleged regulatory infractions and the pleadings offer no basis for overcoming the strong inference of immateriality that arises from the government's response. CVSG: 11/30/2018.
|Date||Proceedings and Orders |
|Dec 26 2017||Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due February 2, 2018)|
|Jan 16 2018||Blanket Consent filed by counsel for both Petitioner, Gilead Sciences, Inc. and Respondents Jeffrey Campie and Sherilyn Campie.|
|Jan 22 2018||Motion to extend the time to file a response from February 2, 2018 to March 5, 2018, submitted to The Clerk.|
|Jan 26 2018||Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including March 5, 2018.|
|Feb 01 2018||Brief amici curiae of Chamber of Commerce for the United States of America, et al. filed.|
|Feb 02 2018||Brief amicus curiae of Coalition for Government Procurement filed.|
|Feb 02 2018||Brief amicus curiae of ConocoPhillips Company filed.|
|Feb 02 2018||Brief amici curiae of Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America; Biotechnology Innovation Organization filed.|
|Feb 02 2018||Brief amicus curiae of CTIA - The Wireless Association filed.|
|Feb 02 2018||Brief amicus curiae of Washington Legal Foundation filed.|
|Mar 05 2018||Brief of respondents Jeffrey Campie, et al. in opposition filed.|
|Mar 20 2018||Reply of petitioner Gilead Sciences, Inc. filed. (Distributed)|
|Mar 21 2018||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/13/2018.|
|Apr 16 2018||The Solicitor General is invited to file a brief in this case expressing the views of the United States.|
|Nov 30 2018||Brief amicus curiae of United States of America filed.|
|Dec 19 2018||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/4/2019.|
|Dec 19 2018||Supplemental brief of respondents Jeffrey Campie, et al. filed. (Distributed)|
|Jan 07 2019||Petition DENIED.|
Just in: The next Supreme Court opinion day will be next Monday. The court expects to release one or more opinions in argued cases from the current term.
End of an era: Here is NBC News prez Noah Oppenheim's memo about Pete Williams' plan to retire this summer
The Supreme Court sides with Sen. Ted Cruz in his First Amendment challenge to a federal campaign-finance law that limits how and when candidates can recoup loans that they make to their own campaigns. The vote is 6-3 along ideological lines.
In an immigration case, SCOTUS rules 5-4 that federal courts do NOT have jurisdiction to review certain executive-branch factual findings that determine whether non-citizens are eligible for "adjustment of status." Those findings can dictate whether a person is deported.
SCOTUS agrees to take up two new cases: Jones v. Hendrix (a habeas corpus case) and SEC v. Cochran (a case about the power of district courts to hear challenges to the constitutionality of the SEC's administrative law proceedings). Full order list here: https://www.supremecourt.gov/orders/courtorders/051622zor_hgcj.pdf
We're live now on SCOTUSblog's homepage or at https://www.scotusblog.com/2022/05/announcement-of-orders-and-opinions-for-monday-may-16/
Today at SCOTUS: The court will issue one or more opinions in argued cases at 10 a.m. EDT. But first, orders on pending petitions at 9:30. We'll fire up our live blog at 9:25 to break it all down and answer your questions. Grab some ☕️ and come join us: https://www.scotusblog.com/2022/05/announcement-of-orders-and-opinions-for-monday-may-16/