|Docket No.||Op. Below||Argument||Opinion||Vote||Author||Term|
|14-8349||Ga.||Nov 2, 2015||May 23, 2016||7-1||Roberts||OT 2015|
Holding: (1) This Court has jurisdiction to review the judgment of the Georgia Supreme Court denying Timothy Foster a certificate of probable cause on his claim, under Batson v. Kentucky, that the state's use of peremptory challenges to strike all four black prospective jurors qualified to serve on the jury for his capital murder trial was racially motivated; and (2) the decision of the Georgia Supreme Court that Foster failed to show purposeful discrimination was clearly erroneous.
Judgment: Reversed and remanded, 7-1, in an opinion by Chief Justice Roberts on May 23, 2016. Justice Alito filed an opinion concurring in the judgment. Justice Thomas filed a dissenting opinion.
|Date||Proceedings and Orders |
|Jan 30 2015||Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due March 9, 2015)|
|Mar 9 2015||Brief of respondent Bruce Chatman, Warden in opposition filed.|
|Mar 24 2015||Reply of petitioner Timothy Tyrone Foster filed. (Distributed)|
|Mar 26 2015||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of April 17, 2015.|
|Apr 17 2015||Record Requested .|
|Apr 20 2015||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of April 24, 2015.|
|Apr 22 2015||Record received from Superior Court of Georgia, Butts County (6 boxes).|
|Apr 27 2015||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of May 1, 2015.|
|May 4 2015||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of May 14, 2015.|
|May 6 2015||Record received from the Supreme Court of Georgia. The record is electronic.|
|May 18 2015||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of May 21, 2015.|
|May 26 2015||Motion to proceed in forma pauperis and petition for a writ of certiorari GRANTED.|
|Jun 9 2015||Motion to appoint counsel filed by petitioner Timothy Tyrone Foster.|
|Jun 15 2015||The time to file the joint appendix and petitioner's brief on the merits is extended to and including July 24, 2015.|
|Jun 15 2015||The time to file respondent's brief on the merits is extended to and including September 8, 2015.|
|Jun 17 2015||Motion DISTRIBUTED for Conference of September 28, 2015.|
|Jul 24 2015||Joint appendix filed (2 Volumes). (Statement of costs filed)|
|Jul 24 2015||Brief of petitioner Timothy Tyrone Foster filed.|
|Jul 31 2015||Brief amici curiae of Joseph diGenova, et al. filed.|
|Sep 8 2015||Brief of respondent Bruce Chatman, Warden filed.|
|Sep 9 2015||SET FOR ARGUMENT on Monday, November 2, 2015|
|Sep 21 2015||CIRCULATED|
|Oct 5 2015||Motion to appoint counsel filed by petitioner GRANTED. and Stephen B. Bright, Esquire, of Atlanta, Georgia, is appointed to serve as counsel for the petitioner in this case.|
|Oct 6 2015||Reply of petitioner Timothy Tyrone Foster filed. (Distributed)|
|Oct 30 2015||Letter from Clerk of Court advising that counsel should be prepared to discuss at oral argument whether certiorari in this case should be directed to the Supreme Court of Georgia or the Superior Court of Butts County, Georgia, and what significance, if any, that determination may have on the Courts resolution of the case.|
|Nov 2 2015||Argued. For petitioner: Stephen B. Bright, Atlanta, Ga. (Appointed by this Court.) For respondent: Beth A. Burton, Deputy Attorney General, Atlanta, Ga.|
|May 23 2016||Judgment REVERSED and case REMANDED. Roberts, C. J., delivered the opinion of the Court, in which Kennedy, Ginsburg, Breyer, Sotomayor, and Kagan, JJ., joined. Alito, J., filed an opinion concurring in the judgment. Thomas, J., filed a dissenting opinion.|
|May 23 2016||MANDATE ISSUED.|
|Jun 24 2016||JUDGMENT ISSUED|
|Jun 24 2016||MANDATE ISSUED|
|Mar 15 2017||The record from Butts County Superior Court has been returned.|
NEW: SCOTUS adds one new case to its docket for next term: Hemphill v. New York, a criminal-procedure case about the interaction between hearsay rules and the right of defendants to confront witnesses against them. Still no action on major petitions involving guns and abortion.
The court will release orders at 9:30 a.m. EDT followed by oral argument in two cases.
First, whether Alaska Native regional and village corporations are “Indian Tribes” for purposes of CARES Act Covid-related relief.
By @StanfordLaw’s Gregory Ablavsky.
Are Alaska Native corporations Indian tribes? A multimillion-dollar question - SCOTUSblog
Are Alaska Native corporations — special corporations that Congress created in 1971 when it resolved Native claims ...
It's official: In the first-ever SCOTUS bracketology tournament, our readers have chosen CHIEF JUSTICE EARL WARREN as the greatest justice in history. The author of Brown v. Board, Loving v. Virginia, and Miranda v. Arizona defeated top-seeded John Marshall in the final round.
We've reached the final round of SCOTUS bracketology, and two illustrious chief justices are facing off for the championship. One wrote Marbury v. Madison. The other wrote Brown v. Board. Our full write-up on both finalists is here: https://www.scotusblog.com/2021/04/the-great-chief-and-the-super-chief-a-final-showdown-in-supreme-court-march-madness/
Cast your vote below!
NEW: The Supreme Court will issue opinion(s?) next Thursday April 22. We’re still waiting on decisions in the ACA case and Fulton v. City of Philadelphia about religious liberty and LGBT rights.
Four Democrats unveiled legislation today to expand the size of the Supreme Court from nine justices to 13 -- but Democratic leaders in both the House and Senate quickly threw cold water on the proposal.
Here's our report from @jamesromoser:
Bill to enlarge the Supreme Court faces dim prospects in Congress - SCOTUSblog
Four congressional Democrats introduced legislation Thursday to expand the number of seats on the Supreme Court from ...
We're so excited about our April 15 Live Webinar (w/ @HarvardACS & @HarvardFedSoc), Covering the Court, featuring an all-star lineup of panelists @jduffyrice, @katieleebarlow, @whignewtons, & @stevenmazie! _👩⚖️👩⚖️👩⚖️👨⚖️👨⚖️👨⚖️👨⚖️👨⚖️👨⚖️_ Register here ➡️ https://harvard.zoom.us/webinar/register/WN_k_b_9IPBQ_GV37rpsjF9kw
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.