|Docket No.||Op. Below||Argument||Opinion||Vote||Author||Term|
|19-511||9th Cir.||Dec 8, 2020||TBD||TBD||TBD||OT 2020|
Issue: Whether the definition of an "automatic telephone dialing system" in the Telephone Consumer Protection Act of 1991 encompasses any device that can “store” and “automatically dial” telephone numbers, even if the device does not “us[e] a random or sequential number generator.”
|Date||Proceedings and Orders |
|Oct 17 2019||Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due November 20, 2019)|
|Nov 07 2019||Blanket Consent filed by Petitioner, Facebook, Inc.|
|Nov 18 2019||Waiver of right of respondent Noah Duguid to respond filed.|
|Nov 20 2019||Brief amicus curiae of Credit Union National Association, Inc. filed.|
|Nov 20 2019||Brief of respondent United States filed.|
|Nov 20 2019||Brief amici curiae of Midland Credit Management, Inc. and Encore Capital Group, Inc. filed.|
|Nov 20 2019||Brief amici curiae of Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America and Business Roundtable filed.|
|Nov 20 2019||Brief amicus curiae of ACA International, Inc. filed.|
|Nov 20 2019||Brief amicus curiae of Retail Litigation Center, Inc. filed.|
|Nov 25 2019||Waiver of the 14-day waiting period under Rule 15.5 filed.|
|Nov 26 2019||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 12/13/2019.|
|Dec 02 2019||Reply of petitioner Facebook, Inc. filed. (Distributed)|
|Dec 04 2019||Response Requested. (Due January 3, 2020)|
|Jan 03 2020||Brief of respondent Noah Duguid in opposition filed.|
|Jan 06 2020||Letter waiving the 14-day waiting period for the distribution of the petition pursuant to Rule 15.5 filed.|
|Jan 08 2020||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/24/2020.|
|Jan 10 2020||Reply of petitioner Facebook, Inc. filed. (Distributed)|
|Jul 07 2020||Supplemental brief of petitioner Facebook, Inc. filed. (Distributed)|
|Jul 08 2020||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 7/8/2020.|
|Jul 08 2020||Supplemental brief of respondent Noah Duguid filed.|
|Jul 09 2020||Petition GRANTED limited to Question 2 presented by the petition.|
|Jul 24 2020||Motion for an extension of time filed.|
|Jul 24 2020||Motion to extend the time to file the briefs on the merits granted. The time to file the joint appendix and petitioner's brief on the merits is extended to and including September 4, 2020. The time to file respondents' brief on the merits is extended to and including October 16, 2020.|
|Sep 04 2020||Brief of respondent United States in support filed.|
|Sep 04 2020||Joint appendix filed.|
|Sep 04 2020||Brief of petitioner Facebook, Inc. filed.|
|Sep 10 2020||Brief amicus curiae of Washington Legal Foundation filed.|
|Sep 10 2020||Brief amici curiae of Professional Association for Customer Engagement and Noble Systems Corporation filed.|
|Sep 11 2020||Brief amicus curiae of Home Depot, Inc. filed.|
|Sep 11 2020||Brief amicus curiae of Salesforce.com, Inc. filed.|
|Sep 11 2020||Brief amicus curiae of Midland Credit Management, Inc. filed.|
|Sep 11 2020||Brief amici curiae of Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America, et al. filed.|
|Sep 11 2020||Brief amicus curiae of Credit Union National Association, Inc. filed.|
|Sep 11 2020||Brief amicus curiae of Portfolio Recovery Associates, LLC filed.|
|Sep 11 2020||Brief amicus curiae of Quicken Loans, LLC filed.|
|Sep 11 2020||Brief amici curiae of “On-Demand” Technology Platforms filed.|
|Sep 11 2020||Brief amici curiae of Retail Litigation Center, Inc., et al. filed.|
|Sep 11 2020||Brief amici curiae of Life Insurance Direct Marketing Association, American Property Casualty Insurance Association and Consumer Credit Industry Association filed.|
|Sep 11 2020||Brief amici curiae of Healthcare Companies filed.|
|Sep 16 2020||SET FOR ARGUMENT on Tuesday, December 8, 2020.|
|Oct 08 2020||Record requested from the U.S.C.A. 9th Circuit.|
|Oct 08 2020||Record received from the U.S.C.A. 9th Circuit is electronic and located on PACER.|
|Oct 16 2020||Brief of respondent Noah Duguid filed.|
|Oct 23 2020||Brief amici curiae of Electronic Privacy Information Center, et al. filed. (Distributed)|
|Oct 23 2020||Brief amici curiae of 21 Members of Congress filed. (Distributed)|
|Oct 23 2020||Brief amici curiae of State of North Carolina, et al. filed. (Distributed)|
|Oct 23 2020||Brief amicus curiae of Main Street Alliance filed. (Distributed)|
|Oct 23 2020||Brief amici curiae of John McCurley and Dan Deforest filed. (Distributed)|
|Oct 23 2020||Motion for divided argument filed by petitioner Facebook, Inc.|
|Oct 23 2020||Brief amicus curiae of Dr. Henning Schulzrinne filed. (Distributed)|
|Oct 23 2020||Brief amici curiae of National Consumer Law Center, et al. filed. (Distributed)|
|Oct 27 2020||CIRCULATED|
|Nov 09 2020||Motion for divided argument filed by petitioner GRANTED.|
|Nov 16 2020||Reply of petitioner Facebook, Inc. filed. (Distributed)|
|Nov 16 2020||Reply of respondent United States in support of petitioner filed. (Distributed)|
|Dec 08 2020||Argued. For petitioner: Paul D. Clement, Washington, D. C.; and Jonathan Y. Ellis, Assistant to the Solicitor General, Department of Justice, Washington, D. C. (for United States, as respondent supporting petitioner) For respondents: Bryan A. Garner, Dallas, Tex.|
NEW: SCOTUS agrees to take up two new cases. Here's the orders list. https://www.supremecourt.gov/orders/courtorders/030121zor_m6hn.pdf
#SCOTUS grants US v. Vaello-Madero, a challenge to exclusion of Puerto Rico residents from eligibility for Supplemental Social Security Income program, which provides benefits to poor disabled adults & children
Good morning. It’s Monday, and it’s March!
At 9:30 a.m. EST, SCOTUS will release orders from Friday’s conference.
At 10:00, the court will consider an appointments clause challenge to administrative patent judges. More from George Quillin & Jeanne Gills.
Justices to consider appointments clause challenge to administrative patent judges - SCOTUSblog
The justices continue their light load for the February argument session next week. First up is Monday’s Unite...
BREAKING: SCOTUS orders California’s Santa Clara County to allow churches to hold indoor services. Breyer, Sotomayor, and Kagan dissent. Here’s the short shadow docket order.
#SCOTUS grants emergency request from northern California churches to allow indoor worship services pending appeal, says result is "clearly dictated" by recent decision. Kagan dissents, joined by Breyer & Sotomayor: https://www.supremecourt.gov/orders/courtorders/022621zr_1bo2.pdf
Just in: SCOTUS opinions expected next Thursday.
#SCOTUS website indicates that the Court will release orders from today's conference on Monday morning, March 1, at 9:30 am, with opinions again on Thursday, March 4, at 10 am. Justices will also hear oral arguments next week, including in Arizona voting dispute on Tuesday.
Apparently all the action today at #SCOTUS was not limited to opinion announcements at 10 am. Major new cert. petition filed today challenging Harvard admissions policy. https://twitter.com/GregStohr/status/1364962610177843210
NEW: Supreme Court asked to outlaw race-based college admissions. Group challenging Harvard admissions policy says it files appeal asking court to over 2003 Grutter decision.
SCOTUS rules against a college student who tried to sue police officers after they mistook him for a criminal suspect and tackled/beat him. The unanimous ruling involves a technical interpretation of the "judgment bar" under the Federal Tort Claims Act. https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/20pdf/19-546_7mip.pdf
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.