|Docket No.||Op. Below||Argument||Opinion||Vote||Author||Term|
|12-1200||9th Cir.||Jan 14, 2014||Jun 9, 2014||9-0||Thomas||OT 2013|
Holding: When, under the reasoning of Stern v. Marshall, the Constitution does not permit a bankruptcy court to enter final judgment on a bankruptcy-related claim, the relevant statute nevertheless permits a bankruptcy court to issue proposed findings of fact and conclusions of law to be reviewed de novo by the district court.
Judgment: Affirmed, 9-0, in an opinion by Justice Thomas on June 9, 2014.
|Date||Proceedings and Orders |
|Feb 22 2013||Application (12A831) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from March 4, 2013 to April 3, 2013, submitted to Justice Kennedy.|
|Mar 1 2013||Application (12A831) granted by Justice Kennedy extending the time to file until April 3, 2013.|
|Apr 3 2013||Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due May 3, 2013)|
|May 3 2013||Order extending time to file response to petition to and including May 20, 2013.|
|May 20 2013||Brief of respondents Peter H. Arkison, Chapter 7 Trustee of the Estate of Bellingham Insurance Agency, Inc. in opposition filed.|
|Jun 3 2013||Reply of petitioner Executive Benefits Insurance Agency filed.|
|Jun 4 2013||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of June 20, 2013.|
|Jun 24 2013||Petition GRANTED.|
|Jul 10 2013||The time to file the joint appendix and petitioner's brief on the merits is extended to and including September 9, 2013.|
|Jul 22 2013||The time to file respondent's brief on the merits is extended to and including November 8, 2013.|
|Aug 27 2013||Consent to the filing of amicus curiae briefs, in support of either party or of neither party, received from counsel for the respondent.|
|Aug 27 2013||Consent to the filing of amicus curiae briefs, in support of either party or neither party, received from counsel for petitioner.|
|Sep 9 2013||Joint appendix filed. (Statement of costs received.)|
|Sep 9 2013||Brief of petitioner Executive Benefits Insurance Agency filed.|
|Sep 16 2013||Brief amici curiae of Robert R. McCormick Foundation, et al. filed.|
|Sep 16 2013||Brief amicus curiae of NVIDIA Corporation in support of neither party filed.|
|Sep 16 2013||Brief amici curiae of Certain Tousa Defendants filed.|
|Sep 16 2013||Brief amicus curiae of Business Law Section of the Florida Bar in support of neither party filed.|
|Sep 16 2013||Brief amicus curiae of Kerr-McGee Corporation filed.|
|Nov 4 2013||SET FOR ARGUMENT ON Tuesday, Jaunuary 14, 2014.|
|Nov 5 2013||CIRCULATED|
|Nov 8 2013||Brief of respondent Peter H. Arkison, Chapter 7 Trustee of the Estate of Bellingham Insurance Agency, Inc. filed. (Distributed)|
|Nov 12 2013||Brief amici curiae of Professors Richard Aaron, et al. filed. (Distributed)|
|Nov 14 2013||Brief amicus curiae of National Association of Chapter Thirteen Trustees filed. (Distributed)|
|Nov 15 2013||Brief amicus curiae of Irving H. Picard, as Trustee of the Substantively Consolidated Estate of Bernard L. Madoff Investment Securities LLC and Bernard L. Madoff filed. (Distributed)|
|Nov 15 2013||Brief amicus curiae of TOUSA Liquidation Trustee filed.|
|Nov 15 2013||Brief amicus curiae of National Association of Bankruptcy Trustees filed. (Distributed)|
|Nov 15 2013||Brief amicus curiae of Professors S. Todd Brown, et al. filed. (Distributed)|
|Nov 15 2013||Brief amicus curiae of Commercial Law League of America filed. (Distributed)|
|Nov 15 2013||Brief amici curiae of States of New Hampshire, et al. filed. (Distributed)|
|Nov 15 2013||Brief amicus curiae of American College of Bankruptcy filed. (Distributed)|
|Nov 15 2013||Brief amicus curiae of the United States filed. (Distributed)|
|Nov 15 2013||Brief amicus curiae of American Bar Association filed. (Distributed)|
|Nov 15 2013||Motion of the Solicitor General for leave to participate in oral argument as amicus curiae and for divided argument filed.|
|Nov 19 2013||Record from the U.S.C.A. 9th Circuit is electronic and located on PACER. Record from the U.S.D.C. for Western District of Washington is also electronic and located on PACER.|
|Dec 9 2013||Motion of the Solicitor General for leave to participate in oral argument as amicus curiae and for divided argument GRANTED.|
|Dec 9 2013||Reply of petitioner Executive Benefits Insurance Agency filed. (Distributed)|
|Jan 14 2014||Argued. For petitioner: Douglas Hallward-Driemeier, Washington, D. C. For respondent: John Pottow, Ann Arbor, Mich.; and Curtis E. Gannon, Assistant to the Solicitor General, Department of Justice, Washington, D. C. (for United States, as amicus curiae.)|
|Jun 9 2014||Adjudged to be AFFIRMED. Thomas, J., delivered the opinion for a unanimous Court.|
|Jul 11 2014||JUDGMENT ISSUED.|
The Supreme Court got rid of several cases this morning -- in one fell swoop. Read @AHoweBlogger's latest coverage of the emoluments cases, spiritual advisers at Texas executions, Texas abortion policies, COVID restrictions, and NY political corruption.
Justices vacate rulings on Trump and emoluments - SCOTUSblog
The Supreme Court on Monday morning released orders from the justices’ private conference on Friday, Jan. 22. The justices once again did not ac...
In this morning's orders list, SCOTUS took no action on pending cert petitions involving:
- Mississippi's near-ban on abortions after 15 weeks,
- a Trump rule banning Title X clinics from providing abortion referrals,
- the Trump administration's "public charge" immigration rule.
No real opinions today. The Supreme Court dismissed cert as "improvidently granted" in Henry Schein Inc. v. Archer and White Sales Inc.—a case about arbitration agreements.
That's all for today, folks.
The Supreme Court does not add any cases to its docket. It sends the Trump emoluments case back to the lower court with instructions to dismiss as moot.
Here is the orders list. https://www.supremecourt.gov/orders/courtorders/012521zor_3f14.pdf
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.