|Docket No.||Op. Below||Argument||Opinion||Vote||Author||Term|
|17-370||11th Cir.||N/A||N/A||N/A||N/A||OT 2017|
Issue: Whether the prohibition in Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 against employment discrimination “because of . . . sex” encompasses discrimination based on an individual's sexual orientation.
|Date||Proceedings and Orders |
|Sep 07 2017||Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due October 11, 2017)|
|Oct 05 2017||Blanket Consent filed by Petitioner, Jameka K. Evans|
|Oct 10 2017||Letter of October 4, 2017 from counsel for Georgia Regional Hospital, et al. received.|
|Oct 10 2017||Motion for leave to file amici brief filed by 76 Businesses and Organizations.|
|Oct 10 2017||Motion for leave to file amici brief filed by Anti-Discrimination Scholars.|
|Oct 10 2017||Motion for leave to file amici brief filed by GLBTQ Legal Advocates & Defenders, et al.|
|Oct 11 2017||Letter of October 10, 2017 from counsel for petitioner received.|
|Oct 11 2017||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/27/2017.|
|Oct 11 2017||Brief amici curiae of the States of New York, et al. filed.|
|Oct 11 2017||Motion for leave to file amicus brief filed by David Boyle.|
|Oct 16 2017||Response Requested. (Due November 15, 2017)|
|Nov 09 2017||Brief of respondents Georgia Regional Hospital, et al. in opposition filed.|
|Nov 20 2017||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 12/8/2017.|
|Nov 20 2017||Reply of petitioner Jameka K. Evans filed. (Distributed)|
|Dec 11 2017||Motion for leave to file amici brief filed by 76 Businesses and Organizations GRANTED.|
|Dec 11 2017||Motion for leave to file amici brief filed by Anti-Discrimination Scholars GRANTED.|
|Dec 11 2017||Motion for leave to file amici brief filed by GLBTQ Legal Advocates & Defenders, et al. GRANTED.|
|Dec 11 2017||Motion for leave to file amicus brief filed by David Boyle GRANTED.|
|Dec 11 2017||Petition DENIED.|
The clerk of the court just notified counsel in a juvenile sentencing case—that was sent back to a lower court this week in light of the court's decision in Jones v. Mississippi—that Justice Kagan unwittingly failed to recuse herself after participating in part of the case as SG.
It’s a quiet week, so now is a great time to listen to Judge John Owens regale @AHoweBlogger with the tale of Ashton Embry and the greatest leak in Supreme Court history.
Come for the high drama, stay for the good humor and an RBG story or two.
The biggest leak in Supreme Court history - SCOTUSblog
In a city full of anonymous sources, the Supreme Court is famously leak-proof. But a century ago, the court had ...
The US Supreme Court should overturn the Facebook’s “Oversight Board’s” “ruling” which upholds the outlawing of the 45th President of the United States from social media.
This is a big tech, corporate oligarchy without standing and it’s gone too far. Enough is enough.
The Supreme Court will hear its last case of the term today at 10:00 a.m. EDT.
Here’s a summary of Terry v. United States in a TikTok minute.
Tomorrow, the Supreme Court will tackle the legacy of the Reagan-era War on Drugs and Congress' attempt to reduce the punishment disparity between crack-cocaine and powder cocaine offenses.
As @ekownyankah notes, this case has a little bit of everything.
In final case the court will hear this term, profound issues of race, incarceration and the war on drugs - SCOTUSblog
Academics naturally believe that even obscure cases in their field are underappreciated; each minor tax or bankruptcy ...
JUST IN: Another shadow-docket filing in which a church argues that state COVID-related restrictions lack sufficient carveouts for religious worship. This one challenges Colorado's restrictions. It relies heavily on last month's ruling in Tandon v. Newsom.
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.