Docket No. | Argument | Opinion | Vote | Author | Term |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
12-445 | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | OT 2012 |
Issue: Whether the proceedings below, in particular the imposition of retroactive liability despite an express statutory proviso that any legal obligation would not arise until the promulgation of regulations that provided the mechanism for compliance, violate the petitioner's constitutional right not to be deprived of property without due process of law.
Date | Proceedings and Orders |
---|---|
Jul 23 2012 | Application (12A84) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from August 9, 2012 to October 8, 2012, submitted to Justice Breyer. |
Jul 24 2012 | Application (12A84) granted by Justice Breyer extending the time to file until October 8, 2012. |
Oct 9 2012 | Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due November 13, 2012) |
Oct 9 2012 | Appendix Volume II of Esso Standard Oil Company filed. |
Nov 13 2012 | Motion for leave to file amicus brief filed by Puerto Rico Manufacturers Association. |
Nov 13 2012 | Brief of respondents Jesus F. Trilla Pinero, et al. in opposition filed. |
Nov 20 2012 | Opposition of respondent to motion of Puerto Rico Manufacturers Association for leave to file brief amicus curiae filed. |
Nov 27 2012 | Reply of petitioner Esso Standard Oil Company filed. |
Nov 28 2012 | DISTRIBUTED for Conference of January 4, 2013. |
Jan 7 2013 | Motion for leave to file amicus brief filed by Puerto Rico Manufacturers Association GRANTED. Justice Alito took no part in the consideration or decision of this motion. |
Jan 7 2013 | Petition DENIED. Justice Alito took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition. |
Apparently all the action today at #SCOTUS was not limited to opinion announcements at 10 am. Major new cert. petition filed today challenging Harvard admissions policy. https://twitter.com/GregStohr/status/1364962610177843210
NEW: Supreme Court asked to outlaw race-based college admissions. Group challenging Harvard admissions policy says it files appeal asking court to over 2003 Grutter decision.
SCOTUS rules against a college student who tried to sue police officers after they mistook him for a criminal suspect and tackled/beat him. The unanimous ruling involves a technical interpretation of the "judgment bar" under the Federal Tort Claims Act. https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/20pdf/19-546_7mip.pdf
We're LIVE now. Opinions in 13 minutes. Come chat with us while we wait.
At 10:00 a.m. EST, the Supreme Court will hand down one or more opinions in argued cases.
We’ll be live blogging through it at 9:45 with @AHoweBlogger, Mark Walsh, and @jamesromoser.
Join us! https://www.scotusblog.com/2021/02/announcement-of-opinions-for-thursday-feb-25/
At 10:00 a.m. EST, the Supreme Court will hand down one or more opinions in argued cases.
We’ll be live blogging through it at 9:45 with @AHoweBlogger, Mark Walsh, and @jamesromoser.
Join us!
Announcement of opinions for Thursday, Feb. 25 - SCOTUSblog
We will be live blogging on Thursday, Feb. 25, as the court releases opinions from the 2020-21 term. This live ...
www.scotusblog.com
Will the Supreme Court make a bright-line rule allowing police officers to conduct warrantless home searches when in “hot pursuit” for a misdemeanor?
Read @AHoweBlogger’s takeaway from the oral argument today.
Justices hear argument on whether “hot pursuit” for misdemeanors allows police to enter home without a warrant - SCOTUSblog
The Supreme Court heard oral argument on Wednesday in the case of Arthur Lange, a northern California man convicte...
www.scotusblog.com
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.