|Docket No.||Op. Below||Argument||Opinion||Vote||Author||Term|
|13-827||3d Cir.||N/A||N/A||N/A||N/A||OT 2013|
Issue: (1) Whether the Second Amendment secures a right to carry handguns outside the home for self-defense; and (2) whether state officials violate the Second Amendment by requiring that individuals wishing to exercise their right to carry a handgun for self-defense first prove a “justifiable need” for doing so.
|Date||Proceedings and Orders |
|Nov 1 2013||Application (13A468) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from November 25, 2013 to January 9, 2014, submitted to Justice Alito.|
|Nov 6 2013||Application (13A468) granted by Justice Alito extending the time to file until January 9, 2014.|
|Jan 9 2014||Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due February 12, 2014)|
|Jan 31 2014||Order extending time to file response to petition to and including March 14, 2014.|
|Feb 12 2014||Brief amici curiae of Gun Owners Foundation, et al. filed.|
|Feb 12 2014||Brief amicus curiae of National Rifle Association of America, Inc. filed.|
|Feb 12 2014||Brief amici curiae of Members of Congress filed.|
|Feb 12 2014||Brief amicus curiae of Center for Constitutional Jurisprudence filed.|
|Feb 12 2014||Brief amici curiae of Wyoming, et al. filed.|
|Feb 12 2014||Brief amicus curiae of Judicial Education Project filed.|
|Feb 12 2014||Brief amici curiae of Cato Institiute, et al. filed.|
|Feb 25 2014||Supplemental brief of petitioners John M. Drake, et al. filed.|
|Mar 14 2014||Brief of respondents Jerejian, Manahan, Fuentes, and Hoffman in opposition filed.|
|Apr 1 2014||Reply of petitioners John M. Drake, et al. filed.|
|Apr 2 2014||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of April 18, 2014.|
|Apr 21 2014||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of April 25, 2014.|
|Apr 28 2014||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of May 2, 2014.|
|May 5 2014||Petition DENIED.|
NEW shadow-docket case: New York landlords ask SCOTUS for an emergency order to prevent the state from continuing to enforce its COVID-related eviction moratorium. They say the moratorium "runs roughshod" over their constitutional rights.
Filing here: https://www.scotusblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/07/21A8-1.pdf
New on the shadow docket: Florida seeks an emergency order blocking CDC policies that substantially limit cruise ships from sailing.
Florida asks #SCOTUS to block, pending appeal, CDC restrictions imposed on cruise industry b/c of COVID-19 pandemic: https://www.scotusblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/07/21A5.pdf
NEW: Mississippi formally asks the Supreme Court to overturn its landmark abortion case, Roe v. Wade, in latest court filing. https://www.supremecourt.gov/DocketPDF/19/19-1392/184703/20210722161332385_19-1392BriefForPetitioners.pdf
Biden’s SCOTUS reform commission met yesterday and discussed several reform ideas including adding justices and adopting a formal code of ethics.
Term limits emerged as a popular idea. But how to implement it — via statute or constitutional amendment?
Term limits emerge as popular proposal at latest meeting of court-reform commission - SCOTUSblog
The Presidential Commission on the Supreme Court reconvened on Tuesday to hear from a new set of experts on vari...
I really enjoyed getting to chat with the incomparable @AHoweBlogger about (1) why #SCOTUS's "shadow docket" *is* a big deal; (2) why it's so hard to figure out how to include it in broader assessments of the Justices' work; and (3) some possible ways to include it going forward. https://twitter.com/SCOTUSblog/status/1417545384314949635
How do you solve a problem like the shadow docket? @steve_vladeck has some thoughts and shared them with @AHoweBlogger in the latest SCOTUStalk.
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.