|Docket No.||Op. Below||Argument||Opinion||Vote||Author||Term|
|13-827||3d Cir.||N/A||N/A||N/A||N/A||OT 2013|
Issue: (1) Whether the Second Amendment secures a right to carry handguns outside the home for self-defense; and (2) whether state officials violate the Second Amendment by requiring that individuals wishing to exercise their right to carry a handgun for self-defense first prove a “justifiable need” for doing so.
|Date||Proceedings and Orders |
|Nov 1 2013||Application (13A468) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from November 25, 2013 to January 9, 2014, submitted to Justice Alito.|
|Nov 6 2013||Application (13A468) granted by Justice Alito extending the time to file until January 9, 2014.|
|Jan 9 2014||Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due February 12, 2014)|
|Jan 31 2014||Order extending time to file response to petition to and including March 14, 2014.|
|Feb 12 2014||Brief amici curiae of Gun Owners Foundation, et al. filed.|
|Feb 12 2014||Brief amicus curiae of National Rifle Association of America, Inc. filed.|
|Feb 12 2014||Brief amici curiae of Members of Congress filed.|
|Feb 12 2014||Brief amicus curiae of Center for Constitutional Jurisprudence filed.|
|Feb 12 2014||Brief amici curiae of Wyoming, et al. filed.|
|Feb 12 2014||Brief amicus curiae of Judicial Education Project filed.|
|Feb 12 2014||Brief amici curiae of Cato Institiute, et al. filed.|
|Feb 25 2014||Supplemental brief of petitioners John M. Drake, et al. filed.|
|Mar 14 2014||Brief of respondents Jerejian, Manahan, Fuentes, and Hoffman in opposition filed.|
|Apr 1 2014||Reply of petitioners John M. Drake, et al. filed.|
|Apr 2 2014||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of April 18, 2014.|
|Apr 21 2014||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of April 25, 2014.|
|Apr 28 2014||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of May 2, 2014.|
|May 5 2014||Petition DENIED.|
Today at the court:
A nuts-and-bolts question of civil procedure. After an appeal is decided, do courts have discretion to limit the administrative “costs” that the prevailing party can recover from the losing party?
Argument begins at 10:00 a.m. EDT.
Justices to consider awards of costs of appellate litigation - SCOTUSblog
Wednesday’s argument in City of San Antonio v. Hotels.com brings the justices a basic nuts-and-bolts question of...
In 2019, the Supreme Court limited the scope of a federal law that bans people convicted of felonies from having a gun. Up this morning at the court: back-to-back cases that will decide how many felon-in-possession convictions will need new trials or pleas under that 2019 ruling.
NEW: SCOTUS adds one new case to its docket for next term: Hemphill v. New York, a criminal-procedure case about the interaction between hearsay rules and the right of defendants to confront witnesses against them. Still no action on major petitions involving guns and abortion.
The court will release orders at 9:30 a.m. EDT followed by oral argument in two cases.
First, whether Alaska Native regional and village corporations are “Indian Tribes” for purposes of CARES Act Covid-related relief.
By @StanfordLaw’s Gregory Ablavsky.
Are Alaska Native corporations Indian tribes? A multimillion-dollar question - SCOTUSblog
Are Alaska Native corporations — special corporations that Congress created in 1971 when it resolved Native claims ...
It's official: In the first-ever SCOTUS bracketology tournament, our readers have chosen CHIEF JUSTICE EARL WARREN as the greatest justice in history. The author of Brown v. Board, Loving v. Virginia, and Miranda v. Arizona defeated top-seeded John Marshall in the final round.
We've reached the final round of SCOTUS bracketology, and two illustrious chief justices are facing off for the championship. One wrote Marbury v. Madison. The other wrote Brown v. Board. Our full write-up on both finalists is here: https://www.scotusblog.com/2021/04/the-great-chief-and-the-super-chief-a-final-showdown-in-supreme-court-march-madness/
Cast your vote below!
NEW: The Supreme Court will issue opinion(s?) next Thursday April 22. We’re still waiting on decisions in the ACA case and Fulton v. City of Philadelphia about religious liberty and LGBT rights.
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.