|Docket No.||Op. Below||Argument||Opinion||Vote||Author||Term|
|20-559||2nd Cir.||N/A||N/A||N/A||N/A||OT 2020|
Issues: (1) Whether Feres v. United States, which held that the Federal Tort Claims Act broadly precludes claims for injuries “incident to service,” was wrongly decided and should be overruled; and (2) whether, alternatively, Feres should be limited so as not to bar tort claims brought by servicemembers injured by violations of military regulations, during recreational activities or while attending a service academy.
|Date||Proceedings and Orders |
|Oct 26 2020||Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due November 30, 2020)|
|Nov 30 2020||Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.|
|Nov 30 2020||Brief amici curiae of Federal Courts and Constitutional Law Professors filed.|
|Nov 30 2020||Brief amici curiae of Constitutional Accountability Center and The Rutherford Institute filed. (Distributed)|
|Nov 30 2020||Brief amici curiae of Protect Our Defenders, et al. filed. (Distributed)|
|Nov 30 2020||Brief amici curiae of Graduates of U.S. Service Academies filed. (Distributed)|
|Nov 30 2020||Brief amici curiae of National Veterans Legal Services Program and Paralyzed Veterans of America filed. (Distributed)|
|Dec 02 2020||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/8/2021.|
|Dec 07 2020||Response Requested. (Due January 6, 2021)|
|Dec 28 2020||Motion to extend the time to file a response from January 6, 2021 to February 5, 2021, submitted to The Clerk.|
|Dec 29 2020||Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including February 5, 2021.|
|Feb 01 2021||Motion to extend the time to file a response from February 5, 2021 to March 8, 2021, submitted to The Clerk.|
|Feb 02 2021||Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is further extended to and including March 8, 2021.|
|Mar 08 2021||Brief of respondent United States in opposition filed.|
|Mar 19 2021||Reply of petitioner Jane Doe filed.|
|Mar 24 2021||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/16/2021.|
|Apr 19 2021||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/23/2021.|
|Apr 26 2021||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/30/2021.|
|May 03 2021||Petition DENIED. Justice Thomas, dissenting from the denial of certiorari. (Detached Opinion)|
NEW: The Justice Department, as expected, says it plans to ask the Supreme Court to block enforcement of the Texas law that bans abortions after six weeks of pregnancy.
NEW: Biden's commission studying proposals for Supreme Court reform has released 200+ pages of "discussion materials" in advance of its final report, slated to be issued next month. The materials are divided into five categories and are available here: https://www.whitehouse.gov/pcscotus/public-meetings/october-15-2021-pcscotus-meeting/
Curious: This morning the Supreme Court website had a dropdown menu option called “financial disclosure reports” (although nothing to see when you click on it). Now it’s gone
Today at SCOTUS: The Biden administration will appear before the justices asking to reinstate the death penalty for Boston Marathon bomber Dzhokhar Tsarnaev -- despite Biden's campaign pledge to end the death penalty and the DOJ's recent moratorium on federal executions.
Brett Kavanaugh was back on the bench today after participating in last week's arguments remotely due to his positive COVID test. Here's the full nine-person bench, in a sketch by @Courtartist.
#SCOTUS calls for the views of the US Solicitor General in Epic Systems v. Tata Consultancy Services, re whether a punitive damages award that complies with a state law that caps punitive damages passes constitutional muster