|Docket No.||Op. Below||Argument||Opinion||Vote||Author||Term|
Issues: (1) Whether an appealing party’s substantial interest in a disclosure order directing a disinterested third party to produce documents provides appellate jurisdiction under Perlman v. United States, when that interest will be lost absent immediate appellate review; and (2) whether a federal court lacks specific personal jurisdiction to enforce a subpoena that is directed to a foreign recipient and demands the production of documents that are unrelated to the recipient’s contacts with the United States.
|Date||Proceedings and Orders |
|Jan 29 2021||Motion (20M57) for leave to file a petition for a writ of certiorari under seal with redacted copies for the public record filed.|
|Jan 29 2021||Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due March 24, 2021)|
|Feb 03 2021||MOTION (20M57) DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/19/2021.|
|Feb 22 2021||Motion (20M57) for leave to file a petition for a writ of certiorari under seal with redacted copies for the public record Granted. Justice Breyer took no part in the consideration or decision of this motion.|
|Mar 17 2021||Motion to extend the time to file a response from March 24, 2021 to April 26, 2021, submitted to The Clerk.|
|Mar 18 2021||Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including April 26, 2021.|
|Apr 12 2021||Motion to extend the time to file a response from April 26, 2021 to May 25, 2021, submitted to The Clerk.|
|Apr 13 2021||Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is further extended to and including May 25, 2021.|
|May 25 2021||Brief of respondent United States in opposition filed.|
|Jun 04 2021||Motion of petitioner to delay distribution of the petition for a writ of certiorari under Rule 15.5 from June 8, 2021 to June 16, 2021, submitted to The Clerk.|
|Jun 07 2021||Motion to delay distribution of the petition for a writ certiorari until June 16, 2021 granted.|
|Jun 15 2021||Reply of petitioner Doe Company filed. (Distributed)|
|Jun 16 2021||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/27/2021.|
A surprising stat at this point in the term: Both Kagan and Breyer have been in the majority slightly more often than Alito.
Kavanaugh continues to have the highest rate (as he has for most of the term). Sotomayor has the lowest.
Still 15 cases left. So this could all change.
The first two pieces in our symposium on yesterday's decision in Fulton v. Philadelphia are up. First, @JimOleske dissects the decision in light of the court's shadow-docket ruling in Tandon v. Newsom, which took a very different approach to free exercise.
Fulton quiets Tandon’s thunder: A free exercise puzzle - SCOTUSblog
This article is the first entry in a symposium on the court’s decision in Fulton v. City of Philadelphia. ...
Number of pages written by each justice in the five decisions handed down this week (majority opinions, concurrences, and dissents all included):
While today's decision in Fulton v. Philadelphia is a win for a Catholic group seeking to participate in the city's foster program, it stops short of the broad endorsement of religious freedom the challengers had hoped for. Here's @AHoweBlogger's analysis:
Court holds that city’s refusal to make referrals to faith-based agency violates Constitution - SCOTUSblog
In a clash between religious freedom and public policies that protect LGBTQ people, the Supreme Court ruled Thursday...
Now do we say that Sonia Sotomayor and the other liberals supported child slavery by all voting for Nestle today? Of course not. And Nestle’s lawyers like @Neal_katyal obviously don’t either. The cheap attacks on the court and thoughtful lawyers did not age well. -tg
The claim @nealkatyal was defending slavery is flat wrong & libelous. Here is what he actually said, which is the reverse: child slavery is abhorrent, criminal, horrific. Remember in a pending case he can't comment, so read what he really said in full.
Tired from this morning's momentous opinions? Get ready to do it all again next week -- three times. The court just revealed that next Monday, Wednesday and Friday will all be opinion days.
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.