Editor's Note :

close editor's note Editor's Note :

We're currently hosting a symposium on Tuesday's decision in Espinoza v. Montana Department of Revenue. Click to follow along.
We also hosted a symposium on Monday's decision in June Medical Services v. Russo. Click to read the submissions.

Briefly Mentioned :

Briefly Noted :

On Thursday, the court released orders from the July 1 conference. The justices granted five cases for a total of four hours of oral argument next term.
On Monday, we expect the court to release opinions at 10 a.m. We will be live-blogging starting at 9:20 a.m. at this link, where you can sign up for an email reminder when the live blog begins.

Dillon v. United States

Docket No. Op. Below Argument Opinion Vote Author Term
09-6338 3d Cir. Mar 30, 2010
Tr.
Jun 17, 2010 7-1 Sotomayor OT 2009

Holding: In certain circumstances, a defendant can ask to be resentenced if the federal Sentencing Guidelines are changed in his favor. The Court held that when this happens, the new Guidelines are binding on the district court at resentencing, even though the court could treat them as merely advisory if it was sentencing the defendant for the first time.

Judgment: Affirmed, 7-1, in an opinion by Justice Sonia Sotomayor on June 17, 2010. Justice Stevens dissented, and Justice Alito took no part in consideration of the case.

SCOTUSblog Coverage

Briefs and Documents

Merits Briefs

Amicus Briefs

Certiorari-stage Documents

 
Share:
Term Snapshot
At a Glance
Awards