|Docket No.||Op. Below||Argument||Opinion||Vote||Author||Term|
|15-9260||8th Cir.||Feb 28, 2017||Apr 3, 2017||8-0||Roberts||OT 2016|
Holding: 18 U. S. C. §924(c), which criminalizes using or carrying a firearm during and in relation to a crime of violence or drug trafficking crime, or possessing a firearm in furtherance of such an underlying crime, does not prevent a sentencing court from considering a mandatory minimum imposed under that provision when calculating an appropriate sentence for the predicate offense.
Judgment: Reversed and remanded, 8-0, in an opinion by Chief Justice Roberts on April 3, 2017.
|Date||Proceedings and Orders |
|May 04 2016||Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due June 10, 2016)|
|Jun 01 2016||Order extending time to file response to petition to and including July 11, 2016.|
|Jun 24 2016||Order further extending time to file response to petition to and including August 10, 2016.|
|Aug 02 2016||Order further extending time to file response to petition to and including September 9, 2016.|
|Sep 09 2016||Brief of respondent United States in opposition filed.|
|Sep 29 2016||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of October 14, 2016.|
|Oct 24 2016||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of October 28, 2016.|
|Oct 26 2016||Reply of petitioner Levon Dean, Jr. filed. (Distributed)|
|Oct 28 2016||Motion to proceed in forma pauperis and petition for a writ of certiorari GRANTED limited to Question 2 presented by the petition.|
|Nov 14 2016||Motion to appoint counsel filed by petitioner Levon Dean, Jr.|
|Nov 21 2016||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of December 9, 2016.|
|Nov 21 2016||Motion DISTRIBUTED for Conference of December 9, 2016.|
|Dec 02 2016||The time to file the joint appendix and petitioner's brief on the merits is extended to and including December 16, 2016.|
|Dec 02 2016||The time to file respondent's brief on the merits is extended to and including January 19, 2017.|
|Dec 12 2016||Motion to appoint counsel filed by petitioner GRANTED and Alan G. Stoler, Esquire, of Omaha, Nebraska, is appointed to serve as counsel for the petitioner in this case.|
|Dec 16 2016||Joint appendix filed. (Statement of costs filed)|
|Dec 16 2016||Brief of petitioner Levon Dean, Jr. filed.|
|Dec 20 2016||Consent to the filing of amicus curiae briefs in support of either party or of neither party from counsel for the petitioner.|
|Dec 22 2016||SET FOR ARGUMENT on Tuesday, February 28, 2017.|
|Dec 23 2016||Brief amici curiae of The National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers, et al. filed.|
|Dec 30 2016||Record requested from U.S.C.A. 8th Circuit.|
|Jan 11 2017||Record received from U.S.C.A. 8th Circuit, 1 Box. Part of the record is SEALED.|
|Jan 18 2017||CIRCULATED.|
|Jan 19 2017||Brief of respondent United States (Corrected) filed. (Distributed)|
|Feb 15 2017||Reply of petitioner Levon Dean, Jr. filed. (Distributed)|
|Feb 28 2017||Argued. For petitioner: Alan G. Stoler, Omaha, Neb. (Appointed by this Court.) For respondent: Anthony A. Yang, Assistant to the Solicitor General, Department of Justice, Washington, D. C.|
|Apr 03 2017||Judgment REVERSED and case REMANDED. Roberts, C. J., delivered the opinion for a unanimous Court.|
|May 05 2017||JUDGMENT ISSUED.|
|Aug 11 2017||Record from the U.S.C.A. for the Eight Circuit has been returned.|
A rule that allows SCOTUS to hear cases before appeals courts weigh in used to be very rare. But in the past three years, it's become far more common. And the justices haven't said why.
@steve_vladeck explains the resurgent writ of "cert before judgment."
The rise of certiorari before judgment - SCOTUSblog
For obvious reasons, the Supreme Court’s decision on Monday to grant certiorari in a pair of cases challenging...
Sonia Sotomayor appeared this morning on @TODAYshow to promote her new children's book, "Just Help!: How to Build a Better World." She spoke briefly about the public's perception of the court. Here's the interview: https://www.today.com/video/justice-sotomayor-on-new-book-supreme-court-s-credibility-loss-of-her-mother-131639365722
Today's big cert grant in a TikTok minute.
In a unanimous ruling, SCOTUS revives a lawsuit against Northwestern University under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act. Current and former employees argue that the university is violating its fiduciary duties in the administration of its retirement investment plans.
BREAKING: The Supreme Court agrees to hear a pair of cases that challenge the race-based affirmative action policies for admission at Harvard University and the University of North Carolina. The cases likely will be argued next term.
Live now: https://www.scotusblog.com/2022/01/announcement-of-orders-and-opinions-for-monday-january-24/
Today at SCOTUS: The court will issue orders on pending petitions at 9:30 a.m. EST, followed by opinions in argued cases starting at 10 a.m.
We'll be live-blogging the developments in real time. Bring your coffee & your SCOTUS questions and come join us: https://www.scotusblog.com/2022/01/announcement-of-orders-and-opinions-for-monday-january-24/