|Docket No.||Op. Below||Argument||Opinion||Vote||Author||Term|
|15-9260||8th Cir.||Feb 28, 2017||Apr 3, 2017||8-0||Roberts||OT 2016|
Holding: 18 U. S. C. §924(c), which criminalizes using or carrying a firearm during and in relation to a crime of violence or drug trafficking crime, or possessing a firearm in furtherance of such an underlying crime, does not prevent a sentencing court from considering a mandatory minimum imposed under that provision when calculating an appropriate sentence for the predicate offense.
Judgment: Reversed and remanded, 8-0, in an opinion by Chief Justice Roberts on April 3, 2017.
|Date||Proceedings and Orders |
|May 04 2016||Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due June 10, 2016)|
|Jun 01 2016||Order extending time to file response to petition to and including July 11, 2016.|
|Jun 24 2016||Order further extending time to file response to petition to and including August 10, 2016.|
|Aug 02 2016||Order further extending time to file response to petition to and including September 9, 2016.|
|Sep 09 2016||Brief of respondent United States in opposition filed.|
|Sep 29 2016||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of October 14, 2016.|
|Oct 24 2016||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of October 28, 2016.|
|Oct 26 2016||Reply of petitioner Levon Dean, Jr. filed. (Distributed)|
|Oct 28 2016||Motion to proceed in forma pauperis and petition for a writ of certiorari GRANTED limited to Question 2 presented by the petition.|
|Nov 14 2016||Motion to appoint counsel filed by petitioner Levon Dean, Jr.|
|Nov 21 2016||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of December 9, 2016.|
|Nov 21 2016||Motion DISTRIBUTED for Conference of December 9, 2016.|
|Dec 02 2016||The time to file the joint appendix and petitioner's brief on the merits is extended to and including December 16, 2016.|
|Dec 02 2016||The time to file respondent's brief on the merits is extended to and including January 19, 2017.|
|Dec 12 2016||Motion to appoint counsel filed by petitioner GRANTED and Alan G. Stoler, Esquire, of Omaha, Nebraska, is appointed to serve as counsel for the petitioner in this case.|
|Dec 16 2016||Joint appendix filed. (Statement of costs filed)|
|Dec 16 2016||Brief of petitioner Levon Dean, Jr. filed.|
|Dec 20 2016||Consent to the filing of amicus curiae briefs in support of either party or of neither party from counsel for the petitioner.|
|Dec 22 2016||SET FOR ARGUMENT on Tuesday, February 28, 2017.|
|Dec 23 2016||Brief amici curiae of The National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers, et al. filed.|
|Dec 30 2016||Record requested from U.S.C.A. 8th Circuit.|
|Jan 11 2017||Record received from U.S.C.A. 8th Circuit, 1 Box. Part of the record is SEALED.|
|Jan 18 2017||CIRCULATED.|
|Jan 19 2017||Brief of respondent United States (Corrected) filed. (Distributed)|
|Feb 15 2017||Reply of petitioner Levon Dean, Jr. filed. (Distributed)|
|Feb 28 2017||Argued. For petitioner: Alan G. Stoler, Omaha, Neb. (Appointed by this Court.) For respondent: Anthony A. Yang, Assistant to the Solicitor General, Department of Justice, Washington, D. C.|
|Apr 03 2017||Judgment REVERSED and case REMANDED. Roberts, C. J., delivered the opinion for a unanimous Court.|
|May 05 2017||JUDGMENT ISSUED.|
|Aug 11 2017||Record from the U.S.C.A. for the Eight Circuit has been returned.|
The clerk of the court just notified counsel in a juvenile sentencing case—that was sent back to a lower court this week in light of the court's decision in Jones v. Mississippi—that Justice Kagan unwittingly failed to recuse herself after participating in part of the case as SG.
It’s a quiet week, so now is a great time to listen to Judge John Owens regale @AHoweBlogger with the tale of Ashton Embry and the greatest leak in Supreme Court history.
Come for the high drama, stay for the good humor and an RBG story or two.
The biggest leak in Supreme Court history - SCOTUSblog
In a city full of anonymous sources, the Supreme Court is famously leak-proof. But a century ago, the court had ...
The US Supreme Court should overturn the Facebook’s “Oversight Board’s” “ruling” which upholds the outlawing of the 45th President of the United States from social media.
This is a big tech, corporate oligarchy without standing and it’s gone too far. Enough is enough.
The Supreme Court will hear its last case of the term today at 10:00 a.m. EDT.
Here’s a summary of Terry v. United States in a TikTok minute.
Tomorrow, the Supreme Court will tackle the legacy of the Reagan-era War on Drugs and Congress' attempt to reduce the punishment disparity between crack-cocaine and powder cocaine offenses.
As @ekownyankah notes, this case has a little bit of everything.
In final case the court will hear this term, profound issues of race, incarceration and the war on drugs - SCOTUSblog
Academics naturally believe that even obscure cases in their field are underappreciated; each minor tax or bankruptcy ...
JUST IN: Another shadow-docket filing in which a church argues that state COVID-related restrictions lack sufficient carveouts for religious worship. This one challenges Colorado's restrictions. It relies heavily on last month's ruling in Tandon v. Newsom.
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.