|Docket No.||Op. Below||Argument||Opinion||Vote||Author||Term|
|14-110||6th Cir.||N/A||N/A||N/A||N/A||OT 2014|
Issue: Whether, in antitrust or other cases in which the plaintiff must prove causation in fact as an element of the claim, a plaintiff must produce evidence of causation to defeat a motion for summary judgment, or whether a court may instead presume causation at summary judgment and permit the case to proceed to trial based on that presumption.
|Date||Proceedings and Orders |
|Apr 25 2014||Application (13A1083) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from June 2, 2014 to July 2, 2014, submitted to Justice Kagan.|
|Apr 29 2014||Application (13A1083) granted by Justice Kagan extending the time to file until July 2, 2014.|
|Jun 17 2014||Application (13A1083) to extend further the time from July 2, 2014 to August 1, 2014, submitted to Justice Kagan.|
|Jun 17 2014||Application (13A1083) granted by Justice Kagan extending the time to file until August 1, 2014.|
|Aug 1 2014||Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due September 3, 2014)|
|Aug 18 2014||Order extending time to file response to petition to and including October 3, 2014.|
|Aug 20 2014||Consent to the filing of amicus curiae briefs, in support of either party or of neither party, received from counsel for the petitioners.|
|Sep 3 2014||Brief amici curiae of National Association of Manufacturers, et al. filed.|
|Sep 3 2014||Brief amici curiae of Air Transport Association of America, Inc., et al. filed.|
|Sep 26 2014||Brief of respondents Food Lion, LLC, et al. in opposition filed.|
|Oct 14 2014||Reply of petitioners Dean Foods Company, et al. filed.|
|Oct 15 2014||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of October 31, 2014.|
|Oct 29 2014||Rescheduled.|
|Nov 3 2014||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of November 7, 2014.|
|Nov 5 2014||Rescheduled.|
|Nov 10 2014||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of November 14, 2014.|
|Nov 17 2014||Petition DENIED.|
We can announce, however, that we'll be liveblogging the release of orders from today's conference AND opinions, starting at around 9:25 @SCOTUSblog. Please join us to discuss the leak, pending opinions, and whatever other SCOTUS-related issues are on your mind. https://twitter.com/AHoweBlogger/status/1524788054434660353
#SCOTUS will release opinions from argued cases at 10 am on Monday. The Court does not announce in advance how many opinions it will release or which ones.
NEW: Next Monday will be a Supreme Court opinion day. Starting at 10 a.m. EDT, the court expects to issue one or more decisions in argued cases from the current term.
Just in: The Supreme Court denies a request to block the execution of Clarence Dixon, an Arizona man who is scheduled to be put to death today. Dixon's attorneys argued that, because of a mental illness, Dixon is not mentally fit to be executed under the Eighth Amendment.
On this date in “How Appealing” history: At this very moment twenty years ago, this blog came into existence, boosting your humble author from nearly total obscurity to perhaps a modicum less than nearly total obscurity.
On this happy occasion, I once https://howappealing.abovethelaw.com/2022/05/06/#179553
How the unprecedented Supreme Court leak may have been a response to an earlier disclosure about the justices' private deliberations. @TomGoldsteinSB on what it all means for the court and its secrets.
How the leak might have happened - SCOTUSblog
Among the debates generated by the leak of Justice Samuel Alito’s opinion in Dobbs is whether the leaker was...
JUST IN: The Supreme Court confirms the authenticity of the draft opinion revealed last night by Politico. The chief justice has ordered an investigation into the leak.