Court of Common Pleas of Pennsylvania v. Piasecki
Petition for certiorari denied on November 4, 2019
Issue: Whether the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 3rd Circuit erroneously concluded, in conflict with all other circuit courts to have addressed this issue, that the respondent, who was no longer serving his state sentence of probation at the time he filed his federal habeas corpus petition and is only subject to the mandates of Pennsylvania’s Sex Offender Registration and Notification Act, met the jurisdictional “in custody” requirement for federal habeas review.
Date | Proceedings and Orders (key to color coding) |
---|
May 28 2019 | Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due July 1, 2019) |
Jun 25 2019 | Motion to extend the time to file a response from July 1, 2019 to July 31, 2019, submitted to The Clerk. |
Jun 28 2019 | Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including July 31, 2019. |
Jul 29 2019 | Motion to extend the time to file a response from July 31, 2019 to August 30, 2019, submitted to The Clerk. |
Jul 31 2019 | Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is further extended to and including August 30, 2019. |
Aug 28 2019 | Motion to extend the time to file a response from August 30, 2019 to September 30, 2019, submitted to The Clerk. |
Sep 03 2019 | Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is further extended to and including September 30, 2019. |
Sep 30 2019 | Brief of respondent Jason Piasecki in opposition filed. |
Oct 16 2019 | DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/1/2019. |
Nov 04 2019 | Petition DENIED. |