|Docket No.||Op. Below||Argument||Opinion||Vote||Author||Term|
|08-1423||9th Cir.||Nov 8, 2010||Dec 13, 2010||4-4||Aff'd by a divided Court||OT 2010|
Holding: An equally divided Court affirmed the Ninth Circuit's holding that the first sale doctrine applies only to copyrighted items that are made and distributed in the United States. (Kagan, J. recused).
Plain English Holding: An equally divided Court affirmed the Ninth Circuit's holding that the "first sale' doctrine applies only to copyrighted items that are made and distributed in the United States. The Court's order establishes no precedent. (Kagan, J., recused)
Judgment: Affirmed by an equally divided Court on December 13, 2010. (Kagan, J., recused).
Reminder: The Biden Supreme Court Reform Commission will hold its first public virtual meeting tomorrow afternoon at 1:00 p.m. EDT.
Office of Asset and Transportation Management; Presidential Commission on the Supreme Court of the United States; Notification of Upcoming Public Virtual Meeting
GSA is providing notice of an open public virtual meeting of the Presidential Commission on the Supreme Court of ...
ICYMI: SCOTUS released a divided opinion yesterday that their 2020 decision in Ramos v. Louisiana—that the 6th Amendment establishes a right to a unanimous jury that applies in both federal and state courts—doesn’t apply retroactively. Via @AHoweBlogger.
Justices divided on retroactive application of jury-unanimity rule - SCOTUSblog
The Supreme Court on Monday ruled by a vote of 6-3 that inmates whose convictions became final before last year&...
Justice Breyer is writing a new book set for release in September: “The Authority of the Court and the Peril of Politics”
Today’s major abortion grant in a TikTok minute.
A very busy morning at the Supreme Court. To sum up: The court issued 4 decisions (including major rulings on the 4th Amendment and non-unanimous juries) and added 3 new cases to next term's docket (including what could be the biggest abortion case in more than a generation).
The Supreme Court unanimously rules in favor of a Rhode Island man who said police violated his Fourth Amendment rights when they entered his home and temporarily seized his guns after his wife reported that he may be suicidal. Here's Caniglia v. Strom. https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/20pdf/20-157_8mjp.pdf
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.