|Docket No.||Op. Below||Argument||Opinion||Vote||Author||Term|
|12-744||11th Cir.||N/A||N/A||N/A||N/A||OT 2012|
Issue: Does an offer to provide a plaintiff with all of the relief he has requested, including more than the legal amount of damages plus costs and reasonable attorney’s fees, fail to moot the underlying claim because the defendant has not also offered to agree to the entry of a judgment against it?
|Date||Proceedings and Orders |
|Nov 5 2012||Application (12A467) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from November 25, 2012 to December 17, 2012, submitted to Justice Thomas.|
|Nov 9 2012||Application (12A467) granted by Justice Thomas extending the time to file until December 17, 2012.|
|Dec 17 2012||Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due January 18, 2013)|
|Jan 16 2013||Order extending time to file response to petition to and including February 19, 2013.|
|Jan 18 2013||Brief amici curiae of ACA International, et al. filed.|
|Feb 15 2013||Order further extending time to file response to petition to and including March 21, 2013.|
|Mar 21 2013||Brief of respondent Anthony W. Zinni in opposition filed.|
|Apr 2 2013||Reply of petitioner Convergent Outsourcing, Inc., fka ER Solutions, Inc. filed.|
|Apr 3 2013||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of April 19, 2013.|
|Apr 17 2013||Supplemental brief of petitioner Convergent Outsourcing, Inc., fka ER Solutions, Inc. filed. (Distributed)|
|Apr 22 2013||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of April 26, 2013.|
|Apr 25 2013||Supplemental brief of respondent Anthony W. Zinni filed. (Distributed)|
|Apr 29 2013||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of May 9, 2013.|
|May 13 2013||Petition DENIED.|
It's official: In the first-ever SCOTUS bracketology tournament, our readers have chosen CHIEF JUSTICE EARL WARREN as the greatest justice in history. The author of Brown v. Board, Loving v. Virginia, and Miranda v. Arizona defeated top-seeded John Marshall in the final round.
We've reached the final round of SCOTUS bracketology, and two illustrious chief justices are facing off for the championship. One wrote Marbury v. Madison. The other wrote Brown v. Board. Our full write-up on both finalists is here: https://www.scotusblog.com/2021/04/the-great-chief-and-the-super-chief-a-final-showdown-in-supreme-court-march-madness/
Cast your vote below!
NEW: The Supreme Court will issue opinion(s?) next Thursday April 22. We’re still waiting on decisions in the ACA case and Fulton v. City of Philadelphia about religious liberty and LGBT rights.
Four Democrats unveiled legislation today to expand the size of the Supreme Court from nine justices to 13 -- but Democratic leaders in both the House and Senate quickly threw cold water on the proposal.
Here's our report from @jamesromoser:
Bill to enlarge the Supreme Court faces dim prospects in Congress - SCOTUSblog
Four congressional Democrats introduced legislation Thursday to expand the number of seats on the Supreme Court from ...
We're so excited about our April 15 Live Webinar (w/ @HarvardACS & @HarvardFedSoc), Covering the Court, featuring an all-star lineup of panelists @jduffyrice, @katieleebarlow, @whignewtons, & @stevenmazie! _👩⚖️👩⚖️👩⚖️👨⚖️👨⚖️👨⚖️👨⚖️👨⚖️👨⚖️_ Register here ➡️ https://harvard.zoom.us/webinar/register/WN_k_b_9IPBQ_GV37rpsjF9kw
Senator Markey (D-Ma) is delivering remarks right now in front of the Supreme Court introducing the Judiciary Act of 2021 to expand the court to 13 justices. He’s flanked by Chairman of House Judiciary, Jerry Nadler (D-NY), and Hank Johnson (D-Ga).
We've reached the final round of SCOTUS bracketology, and two illustrious chief justices are facing off for the championship. One wrote Marbury v. Madison. The other wrote Brown v. Board. Our full write-up on both finalists is here:
Cast your vote below!
The “great chief” and the “super chief”: A final showdown in Supreme Court March Madness - SCOTUSblog
Forget Ali vs. Frazier, Celtics vs. Lakers, or Evert vs. Navratilova. It’s time for Marshall vs. Warren. After...
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.