|Docket No.||Op. Below||Argument||Opinion||Vote||Author||Term|
|12-744||11th Cir.||N/A||N/A||N/A||N/A||OT 2012|
Issue: Does an offer to provide a plaintiff with all of the relief he has requested, including more than the legal amount of damages plus costs and reasonable attorney’s fees, fail to moot the underlying claim because the defendant has not also offered to agree to the entry of a judgment against it?
|Date||Proceedings and Orders |
|Nov 5 2012||Application (12A467) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from November 25, 2012 to December 17, 2012, submitted to Justice Thomas.|
|Nov 9 2012||Application (12A467) granted by Justice Thomas extending the time to file until December 17, 2012.|
|Dec 17 2012||Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due January 18, 2013)|
|Jan 16 2013||Order extending time to file response to petition to and including February 19, 2013.|
|Jan 18 2013||Brief amici curiae of ACA International, et al. filed.|
|Feb 15 2013||Order further extending time to file response to petition to and including March 21, 2013.|
|Mar 21 2013||Brief of respondent Anthony W. Zinni in opposition filed.|
|Apr 2 2013||Reply of petitioner Convergent Outsourcing, Inc., fka ER Solutions, Inc. filed.|
|Apr 3 2013||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of April 19, 2013.|
|Apr 17 2013||Supplemental brief of petitioner Convergent Outsourcing, Inc., fka ER Solutions, Inc. filed. (Distributed)|
|Apr 22 2013||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of April 26, 2013.|
|Apr 25 2013||Supplemental brief of respondent Anthony W. Zinni filed. (Distributed)|
|Apr 29 2013||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of May 9, 2013.|
|May 13 2013||Petition DENIED.|
Today at SCOTUS: Can the federal government prioritize certain groups of unauthorized immigrants for deportation over others? And do states have standing to sue the government if they disagree with those priorities? @AHoweBlogger previews U.S. v. Texas:
In U.S. v. Texas, broad questions over immigration enforcement and states’ ability to challenge federal policies - SCOTUSblog
The Supreme Court will hear oral argument on Tuesday in a dispute over the Biden administration’s authority to...
Today at SCOTUS: The justices return to the bench for oral arguments in a pair of public-corruption cases, both stemming from scandals in New York politics that arose during Andrew Cuomo's time as governor. In both cases, the defendants are claiming prosecutorial overreach.
Cecilia (Cissy) Suyat Marshall, the widow of Thurgood Marshall, died this morning at 94. Here is the court's announcement.
BREAKING: The Supreme Court REJECTS Trump's bid to prevent the House Ways & Means Committee from obtaining his tax returns. No noted dissents.
The brief order may end years of litigation over the committee's efforts to review the tax records of Trump and his businesses.
JUST IN: Whisky, dog toys... and trademark law.
SCOTUS has agreed to hear a dispute between Jack Daniel's and a company that makes squeaking "Bad Spaniels" dog toys. The case will have implications for the tension between parody & intellectual property. https://www.supremecourt.gov/orders/courtorders/112122zr_e1p3.pdf
In a quiet Monday morning order list, SCOTUS adds no new cases to its docket. The court will not hear Brooks v. Abbott, a challenge to an alleged racial gerrymander of a state senate district in Texas. Here's the full order list: https://www.supremecourt.gov/orders/courtorders/112122zor_7lhn.pdf