Docket No. | Op. Below | Argument | Opinion | Vote | Author | Term |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
14-341 | Cal. | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | OT 2014 |
Issue: Whether an employee’s waiver in an arbitration agreement of a collective or “representative action” under the California Private Attorneys General Act, Cal. Labor Code § 2698 et seq., is so distinguishable from a “class action” waiver that it is immune from the otherwise preemptive effect of the Federal Arbitration Act, 9 U.S.C. § 1 et seq., as held by this Court in AT&T Mobility v. Concepcion.
Date | Proceedings and Orders |
---|---|
Sep 22 2014 | Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due October 24, 2014) |
Sep 30 2014 | Consent to the filing of amicus curiae briefs, in support of either party or of neither party, received from counsel for petitioner. |
Oct 15 2014 | Order extending time to file response to petition to and including November 24, 2014. |
Oct 22 2014 | Brief amici curiae of The Employers Group and California Employment Law Council filed. |
Oct 22 2014 | Brief amici curiae of Pacific Legal Foundation and National Federation of Independent Business filed. |
Oct 24 2014 | Brief amici curiae of The Civil Justice Association of California, et al. filed. |
Nov 24 2014 | Brief of respondent Arshavir Iskanian in opposition filed. |
Dec 8 2014 | Reply of petitioner CLS Transportation Los Angeles, LLC filed. |
Dec 10 2014 | DISTRIBUTED for Conference of January 9, 2015. |
Jan 12 2015 | DISTRIBUTED for Conference of January 16, 2015. |
Jan 20 2015 | Petition DENIED. |