|Docket No.||Op. Below||Argument||Opinion||Vote||Author||Term|
|20-334||5th Cir.||Apr 21, 2021||TBD||TBD||TBD||OT 2020|
Issue: Whether, as the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 5th Circuit alone has held, district courts “lack discretion to deny or reduce” appellate costs deemed “taxable” in district court under Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 39(e).
|Date||Proceedings and Orders |
|Sep 10 2020||Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due October 14, 2020)|
|Sep 28 2020||Waiver of right of respondents Site59.com L.L.C. and Travelocity.com L.P. (n/k/a TVL LP) to respond filed.|
|Sep 28 2020||Waiver of right of respondents Travelweb, LLC, et al. to respond filed.|
|Sep 29 2020||Waiver of right of respondents Expedia, Inc., et al. to respond filed.|
|Oct 21 2020||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/6/2020.|
|Nov 02 2020||Response Requested. (Due December 2, 2020)|
|Dec 02 2020||Brief of respondents Hotels.com L.P., et al. in opposition filed.|
|Dec 16 2020||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/8/2021.|
|Dec 16 2020||Reply of petitioner City of San Antonio, Texas, on behalf of itself and all other similarly situated Texas municipalities filed. (Distributed)|
|Jan 08 2021||Petition GRANTED.|
|Feb 18 2021||Motion for an extension of time to file the joint appendix and petitioner's brief on the merits filed.|
|Feb 18 2021||Motion to extend the time to file the joint appendix and petitioner's brief on the merits is granted and the time is extended to and including February 24, 2021.|
|Feb 24 2021||Brief of petitioner City of San Antonio, Texas, on behalf of itself and all other similarly situated Texas municipalities filed.|
|Feb 24 2021||Joint appendix filed. (Statement of costs filed)|
|Mar 03 2021||Brief amicus curiae of United States filed.|
|Mar 03 2021||Brief amici curiae of National Association of Counties, National League of Cities, U.S. Conference of Mayors, International City/County Management Association, and International Municipal Lawyers Association filed.|
|Mar 12 2021||SET FOR ARGUMENT on Wednesday, April 21, 2021.|
|Mar 15 2021||Record requested.|
|Mar 15 2021||The record from the U.S.C.A. 5th Circuit is electronic and located on Pacer.|
|Mar 26 2021||Brief of respondents Expedia, Inc., Hotels.com, L.P., Hotwire, Inc., Orbitz, LLC, Trip Network, Inc., Internetwork Publishing Corp., Travelnow.com, Inc. filed. (Distributed)|
|Mar 29 2021||Motion of the Acting Solicitor General for leave to participate in oral argument as amicus curiae and for divided argument filed.|
|Mar 30 2021||CIRCULATED|
|Apr 05 2021||Motion of the Acting Solicitor General for leave to participate in oral argument as amicus curiae and for divided argument DENIED.|
|Apr 09 2021||Reply of petitioner City of San Antonio, Texas, on behalf of itself and all other similarly situated Texas municipalities filed. (Distributed)|
|Apr 21 2021||Argued. For petitioner: Daniel L. Geyser, Dallas, Tex. For respondents: David B. Salmons, Washington, D. C.|
The clerk of the court just notified counsel in a juvenile sentencing case—that was sent back to a lower court this week in light of the court's decision in Jones v. Mississippi—that Justice Kagan unwittingly failed to recuse herself after participating in part of the case as SG.
It’s a quiet week, so now is a great time to listen to Judge John Owens regale @AHoweBlogger with the tale of Ashton Embry and the greatest leak in Supreme Court history.
Come for the high drama, stay for the good humor and an RBG story or two.
The biggest leak in Supreme Court history - SCOTUSblog
In a city full of anonymous sources, the Supreme Court is famously leak-proof. But a century ago, the court had ...
The US Supreme Court should overturn the Facebook’s “Oversight Board’s” “ruling” which upholds the outlawing of the 45th President of the United States from social media.
This is a big tech, corporate oligarchy without standing and it’s gone too far. Enough is enough.
The Supreme Court will hear its last case of the term today at 10:00 a.m. EDT.
Here’s a summary of Terry v. United States in a TikTok minute.
Tomorrow, the Supreme Court will tackle the legacy of the Reagan-era War on Drugs and Congress' attempt to reduce the punishment disparity between crack-cocaine and powder cocaine offenses.
As @ekownyankah notes, this case has a little bit of everything.
In final case the court will hear this term, profound issues of race, incarceration and the war on drugs - SCOTUSblog
Academics naturally believe that even obscure cases in their field are underappreciated; each minor tax or bankruptcy ...
JUST IN: Another shadow-docket filing in which a church argues that state COVID-related restrictions lack sufficient carveouts for religious worship. This one challenges Colorado's restrictions. It relies heavily on last month's ruling in Tandon v. Newsom.