|Docket No.||Op. Below||Argument||Opinion||Vote||Author||Term|
|17-432||9th Cir.||Mar 26, 2018||Jun 11, 2018||9-0||Ginsburg||OT 2017|
Disclosure: Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys contribute to this blog in various capacities, is among the counsel on an amicus brief in support of the respondents in this case.
Holding: Upon denial of class certification, a putative class member may not, in lieu of promptly joining an existing suit or promptly filing an individual action, commence a class action anew beyond the time allowed by the applicable statute of limitations.
Judgment: Reversed and remanded, 9-0, in an opinion by Justice Ginsburg on June 11, 2018. Justice Sotomayor filed an opinion concurring in the judgment.
|Date||Proceedings and Orders |
|Sep 21 2017||Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due October 23, 2017)|
|Oct 12 2017||Waiver of right of respondent Charles Law to respond filed.|
|Oct 23 2017||Motion for leave to file amici brief filed by Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America, et al.|
|Oct 23 2017||Brief of respondents William Schoenke, Heroca Holding, B.V. and Ninella Beheer, B.V. in opposition filed.|
|Nov 07 2017||Reply of petitioner China Agritech, Inc. filed.|
|Nov 08 2017||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 12/1/2017.|
|Dec 04 2017||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 12/8/2017.|
|Dec 08 2017||Motion for leave to file amici brief filed by Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America, et al. GRANTED.|
|Dec 08 2017||Petition GRANTED.|
|Jan 17 2018||Blanket Consent filed by Petitioner, China Agritech, Inc..|
|Jan 22 2018||Brief of petitioner China Agritech, Inc. filed.|
|Jan 22 2018||Joint appendix filed. (Statement of costs filed)|
|Jan 24 2018||SET FOR ARGUMENT ON Monday, March 26, 2018|
|Jan 24 2018||Blanket Consent filed by Respondents, William Schoenke, Heroca Holding, B.V. and Ninella Beheer, B.V..|
|Jan 26 2018||Brief amicus curiae of DRI--The Voice of the Defense Bar filed.|
|Jan 29 2018||Brief amici curiae of Securities Industry and Financial Markets Association filed.|
|Jan 29 2018||Brief amici curiae of Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America, et al. filed.|
|Jan 29 2018||Brief amicus curiae of Washington Legal Foundation filed.|
|Feb 07 2018||CIRCULATED|
|Feb 21 2018||Record requested from the U.S.C.A. 9th Circuit.|
|Feb 21 2018||Brief of respondents William Schoenke, Heroca Holding, B.V. and Ninella Beheer, B.V. filed. (Distributed)|
|Feb 21 2018||Supplemental joint appendix filed. (Statement of costs filed) (Distributed)|
|Feb 27 2018||Brief amici curiae of Plaintiffs in Post-Dukes Successor Class Actions filed. (Distributed)|
|Feb 28 2018||Brief amicus curiae of Public Citizen, Inc. filed. (Distributed)|
|Feb 28 2018||Brief amici curiae of AARP and AARP Foundation filed. (Distributed)|
|Feb 28 2018||Brief amici curiae of Law Professors filed. (Distributed)|
|Feb 28 2018||Brief amici curiae of Retired Federal Judges filed. (Distributed)|
|Feb 28 2018||Brief amici curiae of American Association for Justice, et al. filed. (Distributed)|
|Feb 28 2018||Brief amicus curiae of National Conference on Public Employee Retirement Systems filed. (Distributed)|
|Mar 16 2018||Reply of petitioner China Agritech, Inc. filed. (Distributed)|
|Mar 26 2018||Argued. For petitioner: Seth A. Aronson, Los Angeles, Cal. For respondents: David C. Frederick, Washington, D. C.|
|Jun 11 2018||Judgment REVERSED and case REMANDED. Ginsburg, J., delivered the opinion of the Court, in which Roberts, C. J., and Kennedy, Thomas, Breyer, Alito, Kagan, and Gorsuch, JJ., joined. Sotomayor, J., filed an opinion concurring in the judgment.|
|Jul 13 2018||JUDGMENT ISSUED.|
Today at the court:
A nuts-and-bolts question of civil procedure. After an appeal is decided, do courts have discretion to limit the administrative “costs” that the prevailing party can recover from the losing party?
Argument begins at 10:00 a.m. EDT.
Justices to consider awards of costs of appellate litigation - SCOTUSblog
Wednesday’s argument in City of San Antonio v. Hotels.com brings the justices a basic nuts-and-bolts question of...
In 2019, the Supreme Court limited the scope of a federal law that bans people convicted of felonies from having a gun. Up this morning at the court: back-to-back cases that will decide how many felon-in-possession convictions will need new trials or pleas under that 2019 ruling.
NEW: SCOTUS adds one new case to its docket for next term: Hemphill v. New York, a criminal-procedure case about the interaction between hearsay rules and the right of defendants to confront witnesses against them. Still no action on major petitions involving guns and abortion.
The court will release orders at 9:30 a.m. EDT followed by oral argument in two cases.
First, whether Alaska Native regional and village corporations are “Indian Tribes” for purposes of CARES Act Covid-related relief.
By @StanfordLaw’s Gregory Ablavsky.
Are Alaska Native corporations Indian tribes? A multimillion-dollar question - SCOTUSblog
Are Alaska Native corporations — special corporations that Congress created in 1971 when it resolved Native claims ...
It's official: In the first-ever SCOTUS bracketology tournament, our readers have chosen CHIEF JUSTICE EARL WARREN as the greatest justice in history. The author of Brown v. Board, Loving v. Virginia, and Miranda v. Arizona defeated top-seeded John Marshall in the final round.
We've reached the final round of SCOTUS bracketology, and two illustrious chief justices are facing off for the championship. One wrote Marbury v. Madison. The other wrote Brown v. Board. Our full write-up on both finalists is here: https://www.scotusblog.com/2021/04/the-great-chief-and-the-super-chief-a-final-showdown-in-supreme-court-march-madness/
Cast your vote below!
NEW: The Supreme Court will issue opinion(s?) next Thursday April 22. We’re still waiting on decisions in the ACA case and Fulton v. City of Philadelphia about religious liberty and LGBT rights.
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.