|Docket No.||Op. Below||Argument||Opinion||Vote||Author||Term|
Jan 18, 2022
Issue: Whether a federal court hearing state law claims brought under the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act must apply the forum state’s choice-of-law rules to determine what substantive law governs the claims at issue, or whether it may apply federal common law.
|Date||Proceedings and Orders |
|May 06 2021||Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due June 10, 2021)|
|May 14 2021||Waiver of right of respondent Thyssen-Bornemisza Collection Foundation to respond filed.|
|May 18 2021||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/3/2021.|
|May 24 2021||Response Requested. (Due June 23, 2021)|
|May 24 2021||Brief amici curiae of 14 Professors of Law filed.|
|Jun 02 2021||Motion to extend the time to file a response from June 23, 2021 to July 30, 2021, submitted to The Clerk.|
|Jun 03 2021||Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including July 30, 2021.|
|Jul 29 2021||Brief of respondent Thyssen-Bornemisza Collection Foundation in opposition filed.|
|Aug 17 2021||Reply of petitioners David Cassirer, et al. filed. (Distributed)|
|Aug 18 2021||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/27/2021.|
|Sep 30 2021||Petition GRANTED.|
|Oct 14 2021||Joint motion for an extension of time to file the briefs on the merits filed.|
|Oct 19 2021||Joint motion to extend the time to file the briefs on the merits denied.|
|Oct 21 2021||Blanket Consent filed by Petitioner, David Cassirer, et al.|
|Oct 21 2021||Blanket Consent filed by Respondent, Thyssen-Bornemisza Collection Foundation|
|Nov 15 2021||Brief of petitioners David Cassirer, et al filed.|
|Nov 15 2021||Joint appendix filed.|
|Nov 17 2021||ARGUMENT SET FOR Tuesday, January 18, 2022.|
|Nov 17 2021||Record requested from the U.S.C.A. 9th Circuit.|
|Nov 17 2021||The record from the 9th Circuit is electronic and located on Pacer.|
|Nov 18 2021||Brief amici curiae of The 1939 Society, et al. filed.|
|Nov 19 2021||Brief amici curiae of B'nai B'rith International, et al. filed.|
|Nov 22 2021||Brief amicus curiae of United States filed.|
|Nov 22 2021||Brief amici curiae of Professors of Law filed.|
|Nov 22 2021||Brief amici curiae of Comunidad Judía de Madrid and Federación de Comunidades Judías de España filed.|
|Nov 22 2021||Brief amicus curiae of Mark B. Feldman filed.|
|Dec 14 2021||CIRCULATED|
|Dec 15 2021||Brief of respondent Thyssen-Bornemisza Collection Foundation filed. (Distributed)|
|Dec 20 2021||Motion of the Solicitor General for leave to participate in oral argument as amicus curiae, for divided argument, and for enlargement of time for oral argument filed.|
|Jan 06 2022||The record received from the United States District Court Central District of California - 1 Box. Exhibits received has been electronically filed.|
|Jan 07 2022||Motion of the Solicitor General for leave to participate in oral argument as amicus curiae, for divided argument, and for enlargement of time for oral argument GRANTED.|
|Jan 07 2022||Reply of petitioners David Cassirer, et al. filed. (Distributed)|
|Jan 18 2022||Argued. For petitioners: David Boies, Armonk, N. Y.; and Masha G. Hansford, Assistant to the Solicitor General, Department of Justice, Washington, D. C. (for United States, as amicus curiae.) For respondent: Thaddeus J. Stauber, Los Angeles, Cal.|
The next #SCOTUS grants? Kevin McCarthy v. Nancy Pelosi in a fight over congressional proxy voting; the First Amendment-based ministerial exception to employment law returns; nondelegation doctrine (!); and the constitutionality of the FTC's structure.
Revenge of the rescheduled cases: Congressional proxy voting, the ministerial exception, and more - SCOTUSblog
The Relist Watch column examines cert petitions that the Supreme Court has “relisted” for its upcoming con...
JUST IN: The Supreme Court, over dissents from the three liberal justices, rejects a request from Texas abortion clinics to immediately return the litigation over Texas' six-week abortion law to a federal district court.
The Supreme Court issues a single opinion today, ruling in an 8-1 vote that a criminal defendant's rights were violated under the Sixth Amendment's confrontation clause when the government introduced a plea allocution from another proceeding. https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/21pdf/20-637_10n2.pdf
Today at SCOTUS: We expect one or more opinions in argued cases to be issued starting at 10 a.m. EST. At 9:45, we'll fire up our live blog, where we'll also chat about this week's arguments and last night's ruling on Trump records. Grab your ☕️ & join us!
Announcement of opinions for Thursday, Jan. 20 - SCOTUSblog
On Thursday, January 20, we will be live blogging as the court releases opinions in one or more argued cases f...
Tonight's ruling on the Trump Jan. 6 documents, explained.
BREAKING: Trump loses his bid at SCOTUS to block Congress from obtaining his White House records related to 1/6/21. Clarence Thomas is the lone public dissenter in the apparent 8-1 ruling.
#SCOTUS rejects request from former President Donald Trump to block the release of documents to committee investigating Jan. 6, 2021 attack on the U.S. Capitol. Here's the link: https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/21pdf/21a272_9p6b.pdf