|Docket No.||Op. Below||Argument||Opinion||Vote||Author||Term|
|14-5273||Cal. Ct. App.||N/A||N/A||N/A||N/A||OT 2014|
Issue: (1) Whether the California police officer violated petitioner Gregory N. Carter’s rights under the Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution by detaining him for jaywalking and, without arresting or taking him into custody, by searching him for identification or officer safety; (2) whether, under the Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution, the California police officer had reasonable suspicion to conduct a pat search of Carter’s outer clothing after stopping him for jaywalking, due to his failure to show identification and his wearing of bulky clothing in a high-crime area with heavy pedestrian traffic; and (3) whether the use of the waiver or forfeiture doctrine by the California Court of Appeal diluted the protection of the Fourth Amendment in the state’s trial courts and violated Carter’s state-created right to appeal his motion to suppress under the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution.
|Date||Proceedings and Orders |
|Jul 8 2014||Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due August 18, 2014)|
|Sep 4 2014||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of September 29, 2014.|
|Sep 17 2014||Response Requested . (Due October 17, 2014)|
|Oct 20 2014||Order extending time to file response to petition to and including November 17, 2014.|
|Nov 14 2014||Brief of respondent California in opposition filed.|
|Dec 4 2014||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of January 9, 2015.|
|Dec 19 2014||Reply of petitioner Gregory Carter filed. (Distributed)|
|Jan 12 2015||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of January 16, 2015.|
|Jan 20 2015||Petition DENIED.|
NEW: The Justice Department, as expected, says it plans to ask the Supreme Court to block enforcement of the Texas law that bans abortions after six weeks of pregnancy.
NEW: Biden's commission studying proposals for Supreme Court reform has released 200+ pages of "discussion materials" in advance of its final report, slated to be issued next month. The materials are divided into five categories and are available here: https://www.whitehouse.gov/pcscotus/public-meetings/october-15-2021-pcscotus-meeting/
Curious: This morning the Supreme Court website had a dropdown menu option called “financial disclosure reports” (although nothing to see when you click on it). Now it’s gone
Today at SCOTUS: The Biden administration will appear before the justices asking to reinstate the death penalty for Boston Marathon bomber Dzhokhar Tsarnaev -- despite Biden's campaign pledge to end the death penalty and the DOJ's recent moratorium on federal executions.
Brett Kavanaugh was back on the bench today after participating in last week's arguments remotely due to his positive COVID test. Here's the full nine-person bench, in a sketch by @Courtartist.
#SCOTUS calls for the views of the US Solicitor General in Epic Systems v. Tata Consultancy Services, re whether a punitive damages award that complies with a state law that caps punitive damages passes constitutional muster