Issue: (1) Whether the Double Jeopardy Clause entitles such a defendant to appellate review of his claim that the government failed to introduce legally sufficient evidence before he is subjected to the opprobrium, embarrassment, and toll of retrial on the same charges; (2) whether such a defendant is at least entitled to cross-appeal the district court’s denial of his motion for judgment of acquittal where the government takes an interlocutory appeal under 18 U.S.C. § 3731 from the district court’s grant of a new trial.
Privacy & Cookies Policy
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.