|Docket No.||Op. Below||Argument||Opinion||Vote||Author||Term|
|14-10078||Mass.||Not Argued||Mar 21, 2016||n/a||Per Curiam||OT 2015|
Holding: The explanation that the Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts offered for upholding a state law prohibiting the possession of stun guns contradicts Supreme Court precedent in District of Columbia v. Heller and McDonald v. Chicago.
Judgment: Vacated and remanded in a per curiam opinion on March 21, 2016. Justice Alito filed a concurring opinion, in which Justice Thomas joined.
|Date||Proceedings and Orders |
|Jun 1 2015||Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due July 6, 2015)|
|Jun 22 2015||Waiver of right of respondent Massachusetts to respond filed.|
|Jul 2 2015||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of September 28, 2015.|
|Jul 13 2015||Response Requested . (Due August 12, 2015)|
|Aug 10 2015||Order extending time to file response to petition to and including October 13, 2015.|
|Aug 11 2015||Brief amicus curiae of Arming Women Against Rape & Endangerment filed.|
|Aug 12 2015||Brief amicus curiae of Commonwealth Second Amendment filed.|
|Oct 13 2015||Brief of respondent Massachusetts in opposition filed.|
|Oct 27 2015||Reply of petitioner Jaime Caetano filed.|
|Oct 29 2015||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of November 13, 2015.|
|Nov 16 2015||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of November 24, 2015.|
|Nov 30 2015||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of December 4, 2015.|
|Dec 7 2015||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of December 11, 2015.|
|Dec 8 2015||Record Requested .|
|Dec 14 2015||Record received from the Supreme Judicial Court, Commonwealth of Massachusetts (1 envelope).|
|Dec 28 2015||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of January 8, 2016.|
|Jan 11 2016||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of January 15, 2016.|
|Jan 19 2016||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of January 22, 2016.|
|Feb 8 2016||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of February 19, 2016.|
|Feb 29 2016||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of March 4, 2016.|
|Mar 14 2016||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of March 18, 2016.|
|Mar 21 2016||Motion to proceed in forma pauperis and petition for a writ of certiorari GRANTED. Judgment VACATED and case REMANDED. Opinion per curiam. (Detached Opinion). Justice Alito, concurring in the judgment. (Detached opinion).|
|Apr 22 2016||MANDATE ISSUED|
|Apr 22 2016||JUDGMENT ISSUED|
|Jun 23 2016||Record from The Supreme Judicial Court, Commonwealth of Massachusetts has been returned.|
Just in: The next Supreme Court opinion day will be next Monday. The court expects to release one or more opinions in argued cases from the current term.
End of an era: Here is NBC News prez Noah Oppenheim's memo about Pete Williams' plan to retire this summer
The Supreme Court sides with Sen. Ted Cruz in his First Amendment challenge to a federal campaign-finance law that limits how and when candidates can recoup loans that they make to their own campaigns. The vote is 6-3 along ideological lines.
In an immigration case, SCOTUS rules 5-4 that federal courts do NOT have jurisdiction to review certain executive-branch factual findings that determine whether non-citizens are eligible for "adjustment of status." Those findings can dictate whether a person is deported.
SCOTUS agrees to take up two new cases: Jones v. Hendrix (a habeas corpus case) and SEC v. Cochran (a case about the power of district courts to hear challenges to the constitutionality of the SEC's administrative law proceedings). Full order list here: https://www.supremecourt.gov/orders/courtorders/051622zor_hgcj.pdf
We're live now on SCOTUSblog's homepage or at https://www.scotusblog.com/2022/05/announcement-of-orders-and-opinions-for-monday-may-16/
Today at SCOTUS: The court will issue one or more opinions in argued cases at 10 a.m. EDT. But first, orders on pending petitions at 9:30. We'll fire up our live blog at 9:25 to break it all down and answer your questions. Grab some ☕️ and come join us: https://www.scotusblog.com/2022/05/announcement-of-orders-and-opinions-for-monday-may-16/