Editor's Note :

close editor's note Editor's Note :

We're currently hosting a symposium on Tuesday's decision in Espinoza v. Montana Department of Revenue. Click to follow along.
We also hosted a symposium on Monday's decision in June Medical Services v. Russo. Click to read the submissions.

Briefly Mentioned :

Briefly Noted :

On Thursday, the court released orders from the July 1 conference. The justices granted five cases for a total of four hours of oral argument next term.
On Monday, we expect the court to release opinions at 10 a.m. We will be live-blogging starting at 9:20 a.m. at this link, where you can sign up for an email reminder when the live blog begins.

C.D. v. Natick Public School District

Petition for certiorari denied on March 2, 2020
Docket No. Op. Below Argument Opinion Vote Author Term
19-229 1st Cir. N/A N/A N/A N/A OT 2019

Issue: Whether a school district’s decision to educate a child with disabilities outside the regular classroom violates the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act’s mainstreaming mandate.

SCOTUSblog Coverage

DateProceedings and Orders (key to color coding)
Aug 20 2019Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due September 20, 2019)
Aug 26 2019Motion to extend the time to file a response from September 20, 2019 to December 6, 2019, submitted to The Clerk.
Aug 28 2019Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including December 6, 2019, for all respondents.
Nov 15 2019Waiver of right of respondent Masssachusetts Bureau of Special Education Appeals to respond filed.
Dec 06 2019Brief of respondent Natick Public Schools in opposition filed.
Dec 20 2019Reply of petitioners C.D., by and through her parents and next friends, M.D. and P.D., et al. filed. (Distributed)
Dec 23 2019DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/10/2020.
Dec 31 2019Response Requested. (Due January 30, 2020)
Jan 29 2020Brief of Masssachusetts Bureau of Special Education Appeals in opposition not accepted for filing. (February 05, 2020 - Document does not comply with Rule 33)
Jan 29 2020Letter dated February 7, 2020 from counsel for respondent Masssachusetts Bureau of Special Education Appeals in opposition filed. (Letter replaces brief in opposition not accepted for filing February 5, 2020)
Feb 12 2020DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/28/2020.
Mar 02 2020Petition DENIED.
 
Share:
Term Snapshot
At a Glance
Awards