|Docket No.||Op. Below||Argument||Opinion||Vote||Author||Term|
|12-7515||8th Cir.||Nov 12, 2013||Jan 27, 2014||9-0||Scalia||OT 2013|
Holding: At least when the use of a drug distributed by the defendant is not an independently sufficient cause of the victim's death or serious bodily injury, a defendant cannot be liable for penalty enhancement under the penalty enhancement provision of the Controlled Substance Act unless such use is a but-for cause of the death or injury.
Judgment: Reversed and remanded, 9-0, in an opinion by Justice Scalia on January 27, 2014. Justice Alito joins the opinion except for Part III-B. Justice Ginsburg filed an opinion concurring in the judgment, which Justice Sotomayor joined.
|Date||Proceedings and Orders |
|Nov 27 2012||Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due January 2, 2013)|
|Dec 5 2012||Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.|
|Dec 13 2012||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of January 4, 2013.|
|Dec 27 2012||Response Requested . (Due January 28, 2013)|
|Jan 23 2013||Order extending time to file response to petition to and including February 27, 2013.|
|Feb 15 2013||Order further extending time to file response to petition to and including March 29, 2013.|
|Mar 26 2013||Brief of respondent United States in opposition filed.|
|Apr 3 2013||Reply of petitioner Marcus Andrew Burrage filed. (Distributed)|
|Apr 11 2013||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of April 26, 2013.|
|Apr 29 2013||Motion to proceed in forma pauperis and petition for a writ of certiorari GRANTED limited to Questions 1 and 2 presented by the petition.|
|May 9 2013||Motion to appoint counsel filed by petitioner Marcus Andrew Burrage.|
|Jun 6 2013||The time to file the joint appendix and petitioner's brief on the merits is extended to and including July 19, 2013.|
|Jun 6 2013||The time to file respondent's brief on the merits is extended to and including September 20, 2013.|
|Jun 10 2013||Motion DISTRIBUTED for Conference of June 13, 2013.|
|Jun 17 2013||Motion to appoint counsel filed by petitioner GRANTED. Angela L. Campbell, Esq., of Des Moines, Iowa, is appointed to serve as counsel for the petitioner in this case.|
|Jul 19 2013||Joint appendix filed. (Statement of costs filed.)|
|Jul 19 2013||Brief of petitioner Marcus Andrew Burrage filed.|
|Jul 26 2013||Brief amicus curiae of Families Against Mandatory Minimums filed.|
|Jul 26 2013||Brief amicus curiae of National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers filed.|
|Aug 19 2013||CIRCULATED.|
|Aug 20 2013||SET FOR ARGUMENT on Tuesday, November 12, 2013.|
|Sep 12 2013||The time to file respondent's brief on the merits is further extended to and including October 1, 2013.|
|Sep 13 2013||Record received from U.S.C.A. for 8th Circuit. (1 box)|
|Sep 17 2013||Record from U.S. District Court, Southern Dist. of Iowa is electronic (Not PACER).|
|Sep 17 2013||Exhibits received from U.S.D.C. of Iowa. Paper and CD exhibits. (1 box)|
|Oct 1 2013||Brief of respondent United States filed. (Distributed)|
|Oct 8 2013||Brief amici curiae of Alaska, et al. filed. (Distributed)|
|Oct 31 2013||Reply of petitioner Marcus Andrew Burrage filed. (Distributed)|
|Nov 12 2013||Argued. For petitioner: Angela L. Campbell, Des Moines, Iowa (Appointed by this Court.) For respondent: Benjamin J. Horwich, Assistant to the Solicitor General, Department of Justice, Washington, D. C.|
|Jan 27 2014||Judgment REVERSED and case REMANDED. Scalia, J., delivered the opinion of the Court, in which Roberts, C. J., and Kennedy, Thomas, Breyer, and Kagan, JJ., joined, and in which Alito, J., joined as to all but Part III-B. Ginsburg, J., filed an opinion concurring in the judgment, in which Sotomayor, J., joined.|
|Feb 28 2014||JUDGMENT ISSUED.|
|Aug 1 2014||Record returned for U.S.C.A. 8th Circuit.|
|Aug 1 2014||Record returned for U.S.D.C. Southern District of Iowa-Des Moines.|
Today at the court:
A nuts-and-bolts question of civil procedure. After an appeal is decided, do courts have discretion to limit the administrative “costs” that the prevailing party can recover from the losing party?
Argument begins at 10:00 a.m. EDT.
Justices to consider awards of costs of appellate litigation - SCOTUSblog
Wednesday’s argument in City of San Antonio v. Hotels.com brings the justices a basic nuts-and-bolts question of...
In 2019, the Supreme Court limited the scope of a federal law that bans people convicted of felonies from having a gun. Up this morning at the court: back-to-back cases that will decide how many felon-in-possession convictions will need new trials or pleas under that 2019 ruling.
NEW: SCOTUS adds one new case to its docket for next term: Hemphill v. New York, a criminal-procedure case about the interaction between hearsay rules and the right of defendants to confront witnesses against them. Still no action on major petitions involving guns and abortion.
The court will release orders at 9:30 a.m. EDT followed by oral argument in two cases.
First, whether Alaska Native regional and village corporations are “Indian Tribes” for purposes of CARES Act Covid-related relief.
By @StanfordLaw’s Gregory Ablavsky.
Are Alaska Native corporations Indian tribes? A multimillion-dollar question - SCOTUSblog
Are Alaska Native corporations — special corporations that Congress created in 1971 when it resolved Native claims ...
It's official: In the first-ever SCOTUS bracketology tournament, our readers have chosen CHIEF JUSTICE EARL WARREN as the greatest justice in history. The author of Brown v. Board, Loving v. Virginia, and Miranda v. Arizona defeated top-seeded John Marshall in the final round.
We've reached the final round of SCOTUS bracketology, and two illustrious chief justices are facing off for the championship. One wrote Marbury v. Madison. The other wrote Brown v. Board. Our full write-up on both finalists is here: https://www.scotusblog.com/2021/04/the-great-chief-and-the-super-chief-a-final-showdown-in-supreme-court-march-madness/
Cast your vote below!
NEW: The Supreme Court will issue opinion(s?) next Thursday April 22. We’re still waiting on decisions in the ACA case and Fulton v. City of Philadelphia about religious liberty and LGBT rights.
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.