BSH Home Appliances Corporation v. Cobb
Petition for certiorari denied on February 24, 2014Linked with:
Issue: (1) Whether after Comcast Corp. v. Behrend the absence of a showing that injury can be proved on a classwide basis precludes class certification under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 23(b)(3); and (2) whether at the class certification stage of litigation a district court must analyze the admissibility of expert testimony under the standards set forth in Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
| Date | Proceedings and Orders (key to color coding) |
|---|
| Jun 14 2013 | Application (12A1210) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from June 30, 2013 to August 22, 2013, submitted to Justice Kennedy. |
| Jun 20 2013 | Application (12A1210) granted by Justice Kennedy extending the time to file until July 30, 2013. |
| Jul 30 2013 | Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due August 30, 2013) |
| Aug 12 2013 | Order extending time to file response to petition to and including September 30, 2013. |
| Aug 30 2013 | Brief amici curiae of Whirlpool Corporation, et al. filed. |
| Sep 27 2013 | Brief of respondents Sharon Cobb, et al. in opposition filed. |
| Oct 15 2013 | Reply of petitioner BSH Home Appliances Corporation filed. |
| Oct 16 2013 | DISTRIBUTED for Conference of November 1, 2013. |
| Dec 24 2013 | DISTRIBUTED for Conference of January 10, 2014. |
| Jan 13 2014 | DISTRIBUTED for Conference of January 17, 2014. |
| Jan 21 2014 | DISTRIBUTED for Conference of January 24, 2014. |
| Feb 10 2014 | DISTRIBUTED for Conference of February 21, 2014. |
| Feb 24 2014 | Petition DENIED. |
