|Docket No.||Op. Below||Argument||Opinion||Vote||Author||Term|
|14-844||D.C. Cir.||Nov 4, 2015||Jan 12, 2016||9-0||Ginsburg||OT 2015|
Holding: When a prisoner files more than one case or appeal in the federal courts in forma pauperis, the Prison Litigation Reform Act, 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b)(2), calls for simultaneous, rather than sequential, recoupment of multiple monthly installment payments.
Judgment: Affirmed, 9-0, in an opinion by Justice Ginsburg on January 12, 2016.
|Date||Proceedings and Orders |
|Jan 16 2015||Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due February 17, 2015)|
|Feb 12 2015||Order extending time to file response to petition to and including March 19, 2015.|
|Mar 13 2015||Order further extending time to file response to petition to and including April 20, 2015.|
|Apr 14 2015||Order further extending time to file response to petition to and including May 11, 2015.|
|May 11 2015||Brief of respondents Charles E. Samuels, Jr., et al. filed.|
|May 15 2015||Letter dated May 13, 2015, from counsel for petitioner received waiving the 14-day waiting period pursuant to Rule 15.5.|
|May 19 2015||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of June 4, 2015.|
|Jun 8 2015||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of June 11, 2015.|
|Jun 15 2015||Petition GRANTED.|
|Jul 14 2015||The time to file the joint appendix and petitioner's brief on the merits is extended to and including August 11, 2015.|
|Jul 14 2015||The time to file respondents' brief on the merits is extended to and including September 22, 2015.|
|Aug 11 2015||Joint appendix filed. (Statement of costs filed.)|
|Aug 11 2015||Brief of petitioner Antoine Bruce filed.|
|Aug 18 2015||Brief amici curiae of Southern Poverty Law Center, et al. filed.|
|Sep 9 2015||SET FOR ARGUMENT on Wednesday, November 4, 2015|
|Sep 10 2015||Record requested from the U.S.C.A. D.C. Circuit|
|Sep 22 2015||Brief of respondents Charles E. Samuels, Jr., et al. filed.|
|Sep 29 2015||CIRCULATED|
|Sep 29 2015||Brief amici curiae of Michigan and 19 Other States filed. (Distributed)|
|Sep 30 2015||The record from the U.S.C.A. District of Columbia Circuit is electronic and located on PACER.|
|Oct 22 2015||Reply of petitioner Antoine Bruce filed. (Distributed)|
|Nov 4 2015||Argued. For petitioner: Anthony F. Shelley, Washington, D. C. For respondents: Nicole A. Saharsky, Assistant to the Solicitor General, Department of Justice, Washington, D. C.|
|Jan 12 2016||Adjudged to be AFFIRMED. Ginsburg, J., delivered the opinion for a unanimous Court.|
|Feb 16 2016||JUDGMENT ISSUED|
The clerk of the court just notified counsel in a juvenile sentencing case—that was sent back to a lower court this week in light of the court's decision in Jones v. Mississippi—that Justice Kagan unwittingly failed to recuse herself after participating in part of the case as SG.
It’s a quiet week, so now is a great time to listen to Judge John Owens regale @AHoweBlogger with the tale of Ashton Embry and the greatest leak in Supreme Court history.
Come for the high drama, stay for the good humor and an RBG story or two.
The biggest leak in Supreme Court history - SCOTUSblog
In a city full of anonymous sources, the Supreme Court is famously leak-proof. But a century ago, the court had ...
The US Supreme Court should overturn the Facebook’s “Oversight Board’s” “ruling” which upholds the outlawing of the 45th President of the United States from social media.
This is a big tech, corporate oligarchy without standing and it’s gone too far. Enough is enough.
The Supreme Court will hear its last case of the term today at 10:00 a.m. EDT.
Here’s a summary of Terry v. United States in a TikTok minute.
Tomorrow, the Supreme Court will tackle the legacy of the Reagan-era War on Drugs and Congress' attempt to reduce the punishment disparity between crack-cocaine and powder cocaine offenses.
As @ekownyankah notes, this case has a little bit of everything.
In final case the court will hear this term, profound issues of race, incarceration and the war on drugs - SCOTUSblog
Academics naturally believe that even obscure cases in their field are underappreciated; each minor tax or bankruptcy ...
JUST IN: Another shadow-docket filing in which a church argues that state COVID-related restrictions lack sufficient carveouts for religious worship. This one challenges Colorado's restrictions. It relies heavily on last month's ruling in Tandon v. Newsom.
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.