Editor's Note :

close editor's note Editor's Note :

There is a possibility of opinions on Wednesday at 10 a.m. We will live-blog starting at 9:45 a.m. at this link, where readers can sign up for an email reminder when we begin the live blog.

Blackstone Group, L.P. v. Litwin

Petition for certiorari denied on October 3, 2011
Docket No. Op. Below Argument Opinion Vote Author Term
11-15 2d Cir. N/A N/A N/A N/A OT 2011

Issue: Whether, in assessing the materiality of alleged omissions in a registration statement for an initial public offering, the court below erred in (i) considering only whether the alleged omission related to a significant business segment of the issuer's business, ignoring the alleged omission's relationship to the issuer's business as a whole, thereby overriding the requirement of Matrixx Initiatives, Inc. v. Siracusano (2011), that any omissions must “significantly” alter the total mix of investor information; (ii) discarding long-standing judicial and regulatory authority regarding the importance of quantitative analysis in making materiality determinations, including a rule of thumb that omissions affecting amounts less than 5% are likely immaterial; and (iii) impermissibly requiring issuers to flood investors with unnecessary and confusing detail.

Briefs and Documents

Certiorari-stage documents

 
Share:
Term Snapshot
Awards