Docket No. | Op. Below | Argument | Opinion | Vote | Author | Term |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
20-197 | 2nd Cir. | TBD | TBD | TBD | TBD | OT 2021 |
Issue: Whether the First Amendment deprives a government official of his right to control his personal Twitter account by blocking third-party accounts if he uses that personal account in part to announce official actions and policies.
Date | Proceedings and Orders |
---|---|
Aug 20 2020 | Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due September 21, 2020) |
Sep 21 2020 | Brief of respondents Knight First Amendment Institute at Columbia University, et al. in opposition filed. |
Oct 06 2020 | Reply of petitioners Trump, Donald J., President for the United States, et al. filed. |
Oct 07 2020 | DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/30/2020. |
Oct 28 2020 | Rescheduled. |
Nov 02 2020 | DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/6/2020. |
Nov 04 2020 | Rescheduled. |
Nov 09 2020 | DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/13/2020. |
Nov 10 2020 | Rescheduled. |
Nov 16 2020 | DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/20/2020. |
Nov 18 2020 | Rescheduled. |
Nov 30 2020 | DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 12/4/2020. |
Dec 07 2020 | DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 12/11/2020. |
Jan 04 2021 | DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/8/2021. |
Jan 11 2021 | DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/15/2021. |
Jan 19 2021 | DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/22/2021. |
Jan 19 2021 | Supplemental brief of petitioners Trump, Donald J., President for the United States, et al. filed. |
Jan 21 2021 | Supplemental brief of respondents Knight First Amendment Institute at Columbia University, et al. filed. |
Feb 12 2021 | DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/19/2021. |
Feb 22 2021 | DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/26/2021. |
Mar 01 2021 | DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/5/2021. |
Mar 15 2021 | DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/19/2021. |
Mar 22 2021 | DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/26/2021. |
Mar 29 2021 | DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/1/2021. |
Apr 05 2021 | Petition GRANTED. Judgment VACATED and case REMANDED with instructions to dismiss the case as moot. See United States v. Munsingwear, Inc., 340 U. S. 36 (1950). Justice Thomas, concurring. (Detached Opinion) |
Today at the court:
A nuts-and-bolts question of civil procedure. After an appeal is decided, do courts have discretion to limit the administrative “costs” that the prevailing party can recover from the losing party?
Argument begins at 10:00 a.m. EDT.
Justices to consider awards of costs of appellate litigation - SCOTUSblog
Wednesday’s argument in City of San Antonio v. Hotels.com brings the justices a basic nuts-and-bolts question of...
www.scotusblog.com
In 2019, the Supreme Court limited the scope of a federal law that bans people convicted of felonies from having a gun. Up this morning at the court: back-to-back cases that will decide how many felon-in-possession convictions will need new trials or pleas under that 2019 ruling.
NEW: SCOTUS adds one new case to its docket for next term: Hemphill v. New York, a criminal-procedure case about the interaction between hearsay rules and the right of defendants to confront witnesses against them. Still no action on major petitions involving guns and abortion.
The court will release orders at 9:30 a.m. EDT followed by oral argument in two cases.
First, whether Alaska Native regional and village corporations are “Indian Tribes” for purposes of CARES Act Covid-related relief.
By @StanfordLaw’s Gregory Ablavsky.
Are Alaska Native corporations Indian tribes? A multimillion-dollar question - SCOTUSblog
Are Alaska Native corporations — special corporations that Congress created in 1971 when it resolved Native claims ...
www.scotusblog.com
It's official: In the first-ever SCOTUS bracketology tournament, our readers have chosen CHIEF JUSTICE EARL WARREN as the greatest justice in history. The author of Brown v. Board, Loving v. Virginia, and Miranda v. Arizona defeated top-seeded John Marshall in the final round.
We've reached the final round of SCOTUS bracketology, and two illustrious chief justices are facing off for the championship. One wrote Marbury v. Madison. The other wrote Brown v. Board. Our full write-up on both finalists is here: https://www.scotusblog.com/2021/04/the-great-chief-and-the-super-chief-a-final-showdown-in-supreme-court-march-madness/
Cast your vote below!
NEW: The Supreme Court will issue opinion(s?) next Thursday April 22. We’re still waiting on decisions in the ACA case and Fulton v. City of Philadelphia about religious liberty and LGBT rights.
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.