|Docket No.||Op. Below||Argument||Opinion||Vote||Author||Term|
|14-1507||N.D.||Apr 20, 2016||Jun 23, 2016||7-1||Alito||OT 2015|
Holding: The Fourth Amendment permits warrantless breath tests incident to arrests for drunk driving but not warrantless blood tests.
Judgment: Vacated and remanded, 7-1, in an opinion by Justice Alito on June 23, 2016. Justice Sotomayor filed a concurring opinion, in which Justice Ginsburg joined. Justice Thomas filed a dissenting opinion.
|Date||Proceedings and Orders |
|Jun 22 2015||Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due July 23, 2015)|
|Jul 15 2015||Waiver of right of respondent Grant Levi, Director, North Dakota Department of Transportation to respond filed.|
|Jul 29 2015||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of September 28, 2015.|
|Aug 26 2015||Response Requested.(Due September 25, 2015)|
|Sep 24 2015||Brief of respondent Grant Levi, Director, North Dakota Department of Transportation in opposition filed.|
|Nov 17 2015||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of December 4, 2015.|
|Dec 07 2015||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of December 11, 2015.|
|Dec 11 2015||Petition GRANTED The petitions for writs of certiorari in No. 14-1468 and No. 14-1470 are granted. The cases are consolidated and a total of one hour is allotted for oral argument.|
|Jan 26 2016||The time to file the joint appendix and petitioners' briefs on the merits is extended to and including February 4, 2016. VIDED|
|Jan 26 2016||The time to file respondents' briefs on the merits is extended to and including March 15, 2016. VIDED|
|Feb 04 2016||Brief of petitioner Steve Michael Beylund filed.|
|Feb 04 2016||Motion to dispense with printing the joint appendix filed by petitioner Danny Birchfield. VIDED.|
|Feb 08 2016||Motion for leave to file amicus brief filed by Indiana Tech Law School Amicus Project in support of neither party. VIDED.|
|Feb 09 2016||Brief amicus curiae of DUI Defense Lawyers Association filed. VIDED.|
|Feb 11 2016||Brief amici curiae of Downsize DC Foundation, et al. filed. VIDED.|
|Feb 11 2016||Brief amicus curiae of American Civil Liberties Union filed. VIDED.|
|Feb 11 2016||Brief amici curiae of The National College for DUI Defense, and The National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers filed. VIDED.|
|Feb 29 2016||Motion to dispense with printing the joint appendix filed by petitioner GRANTED. VIDED|
|Feb 29 2016||Motion for leave to file amicus brief filed by Indiana Tech Law School Amicus Project in support of neither party GRANTED. VIDED|
|Mar 04 2016||SET FOR ARGUMENT ON Wednesday, April 20, 2016. VIDED|
|Mar 14 2016||Record requested from the Supreme Court of North Dakota.|
|Mar 15 2016||DISTRIBUTED.|
|Mar 15 2016||Brief of respondent Grant Levi, Director, North Dakota Department of Transportation filed. (Distributed)|
|Mar 16 2016||Brief amicus curiae of The California District Attorneys Association filed. VIDED. (Distributed)|
|Mar 18 2016||Record received from U.S.D.C. District of Bowman County. (1-Box)|
|Mar 22 2016||Brief amicus curiae of United States filed. VIDED. (Distributed)|
|Mar 22 2016||Brief amici curiae of New Jersey and Seventeen States filed. VIDED. (Distributed)|
|Mar 22 2016||Brief amici curiae of The Council of State Governments, et al. filed. VIDED. (Distributed)|
|Mar 22 2016||Motion of the Solicitor General for enlargement of time for oral argument, for leave to participate in oral argument as amicus curiae and for divided argument filed. VIDED.|
|Mar 22 2016||Brief amicus curiae of Mothers Against Drunk Driving filed. VIDED. (Distributed)|
|Mar 22 2016||Brief amicus curiae of Criminal Justice Legal Foundation filed. (Distributed)|
|Mar 22 2016||Brief amici curiae of The National District Attorneys Association, et al. filed. VIDED. (Distributed)|
|Apr 04 2016||Motion of the Solicitor General for leave to participate in oral argument as amicus curiae, for enlargement of time for oral argument, and for divided argument GRANTED. and the time is divided as follows: 35 minutes for petitioners, 15 minutes for respondent North Dakota, 10 minutes for respondent Minnesota, and 10 minutes for the Solicitor General. VIDED|
|Apr 13 2016||Reply of petitioner Steve Michael Beylund filed. (Distributed)|
|Apr 20 2016||Argued. For petitioners: Charles A. Rothfeld, Washington, D. C. For respondents in Nos. 14-1468 & 14-1507: Thomas R. McCarthy, Arlington, Va. For respondent in 14-1470: Kathryn Keena, Assistant Dakota County Attorney, Hastings, Minn. For United States as amicus curiae in support of respondents: Ian H. Gershengorn, Deputy Solicitor General, Department of Justice, Washington, D. C. VIDED.|
|Jun 23 2016||Judgment in No. 14-1468 REVERSED and case REMANDED. Judgment in No. 14-1470 AFFIRMED. Judgment in No. 14-1507 VACATED AND REMANDED. Alito, J., delivered the opinion of the Court, in which Roberts, C. J., and Kennedy, Breyer, and Kagan, JJ., joined. Sotomayor, J., filed an opinion concurring in part and dissenting in part, in which Ginsburg, J., joined. Thomas, J., filed an opinion concurring in the judgment in part and dissenting in part.|
|Jul 25 2016||JUDGMENT ISSUED|
|Jul 25 2016||MANDATE ISSUED|
|Aug 28 2017||Record from U.S.D.C. Bowman County has been returned.|
The clerk of the court just notified counsel in a juvenile sentencing case—that was sent back to a lower court this week in light of the court's decision in Jones v. Mississippi—that Justice Kagan unwittingly failed to recuse herself after participating in part of the case as SG.
It’s a quiet week, so now is a great time to listen to Judge John Owens regale @AHoweBlogger with the tale of Ashton Embry and the greatest leak in Supreme Court history.
Come for the high drama, stay for the good humor and an RBG story or two.
The biggest leak in Supreme Court history - SCOTUSblog
In a city full of anonymous sources, the Supreme Court is famously leak-proof. But a century ago, the court had ...
The US Supreme Court should overturn the Facebook’s “Oversight Board’s” “ruling” which upholds the outlawing of the 45th President of the United States from social media.
This is a big tech, corporate oligarchy without standing and it’s gone too far. Enough is enough.
The Supreme Court will hear its last case of the term today at 10:00 a.m. EDT.
Here’s a summary of Terry v. United States in a TikTok minute.
Tomorrow, the Supreme Court will tackle the legacy of the Reagan-era War on Drugs and Congress' attempt to reduce the punishment disparity between crack-cocaine and powder cocaine offenses.
As @ekownyankah notes, this case has a little bit of everything.
In final case the court will hear this term, profound issues of race, incarceration and the war on drugs - SCOTUSblog
Academics naturally believe that even obscure cases in their field are underappreciated; each minor tax or bankruptcy ...
JUST IN: Another shadow-docket filing in which a church argues that state COVID-related restrictions lack sufficient carveouts for religious worship. This one challenges Colorado's restrictions. It relies heavily on last month's ruling in Tandon v. Newsom.
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.