Docket No. | Op. Below | Argument | Opinion | Vote | Author | Term |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
11-1278 | Fed. Cir. | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | OT 2012 |
Issue: (1) Whether the Federal Circuit’s construction of the “lodging” limitation should be reversed because, at the urging of Retractable Technologies, Inc. (RTI), the Federal Circuit deviated from the term’s clear meaning on far weaker grounds than the court relied on to construe the ambiguous term “body”; (2) whether the Federal Circuit’s construction of the “retainer member” limitation should be reversed because, at RTI’s urging, the Federal Circuit deviated from the term’s clear meaning on far weaker grounds than the court relied on to construe the ambiguous term “body”; and (3) whether the Federal Circuit’s holding that the asserted claims cover devices that work by cutting should be reversed because, at RTI’s urging, the Federal Circuit disregarded a clear disclaimer of claim scope on far weaker grounds than the court relied on to construe the ambiguous term “body.”
Date | Proceedings and Orders |
---|---|
Jan 18 2012 | Application (11A683) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from January 29, 2012 to March 19, 2012, submitted to The Chief Justice. |
Jan 19 2012 | Application (11A683) granted by The Chief Justice extending the time to file until March 26, 2012. |
Mar 20 2012 | Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due April 23, 2012) |
Apr 23 2012 | Brief amicus curiae of Indiana University Maurer School of Law Center for Intellectual Property Research filed. |
Apr 24 2012 | Order extending time to file response to petition to and including May 25, 2012. |
May 25 2012 | Brief of respondent Becton, Dickinson and Company in opposition filed. |
Jun 4 2012 | Reply of petitioners Retractable Technologies, Inc., and Thomas J. Shaw filed. |
Jun 5 2012 | DISTRIBUTED for Conference of June 21, 2012. |
Jun 25 2012 | DISTRIBUTED for Conference of June 28, 2012. |
Jun 29 2012 | The Solicitor General is invited to file a brief in this case expressing the views of the United States. |
Nov 28 2012 | Brief amicus curiae of United States filed. |
Dec 12 2012 | DISTRIBUTED for Conference of January 4, 2013. |
Dec 12 2012 | Supplemental brief of petitioners Retractable Technologies, Inc., et al. filed. (Distributed) |
Jan 7 2013 | Petition DENIED. |
Apparently all the action today at #SCOTUS was not limited to opinion announcements at 10 am. Major new cert. petition filed today challenging Harvard admissions policy. https://twitter.com/GregStohr/status/1364962610177843210
NEW: Supreme Court asked to outlaw race-based college admissions. Group challenging Harvard admissions policy says it files appeal asking court to over 2003 Grutter decision.
SCOTUS rules against a college student who tried to sue police officers after they mistook him for a criminal suspect and tackled/beat him. The unanimous ruling involves a technical interpretation of the "judgment bar" under the Federal Tort Claims Act. https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/20pdf/19-546_7mip.pdf
We're LIVE now. Opinions in 13 minutes. Come chat with us while we wait.
At 10:00 a.m. EST, the Supreme Court will hand down one or more opinions in argued cases.
We’ll be live blogging through it at 9:45 with @AHoweBlogger, Mark Walsh, and @jamesromoser.
Join us! https://www.scotusblog.com/2021/02/announcement-of-opinions-for-thursday-feb-25/
At 10:00 a.m. EST, the Supreme Court will hand down one or more opinions in argued cases.
We’ll be live blogging through it at 9:45 with @AHoweBlogger, Mark Walsh, and @jamesromoser.
Join us!
Announcement of opinions for Thursday, Feb. 25 - SCOTUSblog
We will be live blogging on Thursday, Feb. 25, as the court releases opinions from the 2020-21 term. This live ...
www.scotusblog.com
Will the Supreme Court make a bright-line rule allowing police officers to conduct warrantless home searches when in “hot pursuit” for a misdemeanor?
Read @AHoweBlogger’s takeaway from the oral argument today.
Justices hear argument on whether “hot pursuit” for misdemeanors allows police to enter home without a warrant - SCOTUSblog
The Supreme Court heard oral argument on Wednesday in the case of Arthur Lange, a northern California man convicte...
www.scotusblog.com
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.