|Docket No.||Op. Below||Argument||Opinion||Vote||Author||Term|
|19-402||9th Cir.||N/A||N/A||N/A||N/A||OT 2019|
Issues: (1) Whether National Cable & Telecommunications Association v. Brand X Internet Services should be overruled; and (2) whether a federal agency’s statutory construction should receive any deference when it contradicts a court’s precedent and disregards traditional tools of statutory interpretation, such as the common-law presumption canon.
|Date||Proceedings and Orders |
|Sep 23 2019||Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due October 25, 2019)|
|Sep 25 2019||Blanket Consent filed by Petitioner, Howard Baldwin, et al.|
|Oct 17 2019||Motion to extend the time to file a response from October 25, 2019 to November 25, 2019, submitted to The Clerk.|
|Oct 18 2019||Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including November 25, 2019.|
|Oct 23 2019||Brief amicus curiae of Goldwater Institute filed.|
|Oct 24 2019||Brief amici curiae of Americans for Prosperity and Cause of Action Institute filed.|
|Oct 24 2019||Brief amicus curiae of Center for Constitutional Jurisprudence filed.|
|Oct 25 2019||Brief amicus curiae of National Right to Work Legal Defense Foundation, Inc. filed.|
|Oct 25 2019||Brief amici curiae of The Cato Institute filed.|
|Oct 25 2019||Brief amicus curiae of New England Legal Foundation filed.|
|Nov 15 2019||Motion to extend the time to file a response from November 25, 2019 to December 9, 2019, submitted to The Clerk.|
|Nov 18 2019||Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is further extended to and including December 9, 2019.|
|Dec 09 2019||Brief of respondent United States of America in opposition filed.|
|Dec 23 2019||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/10/2020.|
|Dec 23 2019||Reply of petitioners Howard Baldwin, et al. filed.|
|Jan 13 2020||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/17/2020.|
|Jan 21 2020||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/24/2020.|
|Feb 14 2020||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/21/2020.|
|Feb 24 2020||Petition DENIED. Justice Thomas, dissenting from the denial of certiorari. (Detached Opinion)|
The clerk of the court just notified counsel in a juvenile sentencing case—that was sent back to a lower court this week in light of the court's decision in Jones v. Mississippi—that Justice Kagan unwittingly failed to recuse herself after participating in part of the case as SG.
It’s a quiet week, so now is a great time to listen to Judge John Owens regale @AHoweBlogger with the tale of Ashton Embry and the greatest leak in Supreme Court history.
Come for the high drama, stay for the good humor and an RBG story or two.
The biggest leak in Supreme Court history - SCOTUSblog
In a city full of anonymous sources, the Supreme Court is famously leak-proof. But a century ago, the court had ...
The US Supreme Court should overturn the Facebook’s “Oversight Board’s” “ruling” which upholds the outlawing of the 45th President of the United States from social media.
This is a big tech, corporate oligarchy without standing and it’s gone too far. Enough is enough.
The Supreme Court will hear its last case of the term today at 10:00 a.m. EDT.
Here’s a summary of Terry v. United States in a TikTok minute.
Tomorrow, the Supreme Court will tackle the legacy of the Reagan-era War on Drugs and Congress' attempt to reduce the punishment disparity between crack-cocaine and powder cocaine offenses.
As @ekownyankah notes, this case has a little bit of everything.
In final case the court will hear this term, profound issues of race, incarceration and the war on drugs - SCOTUSblog
Academics naturally believe that even obscure cases in their field are underappreciated; each minor tax or bankruptcy ...
JUST IN: Another shadow-docket filing in which a church argues that state COVID-related restrictions lack sufficient carveouts for religious worship. This one challenges Colorado's restrictions. It relies heavily on last month's ruling in Tandon v. Newsom.
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.