|Docket No.||Op. Below||Argument||Opinion||Vote||Author||Term|
|18-1140||3d Cir.||N/A||N/A||N/A||N/A||OT 2019|
Disclosure: Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys contribute to this blog in various capacities, is counsel to the respondent in this case.
Issue: Whether the Federal Aviation Act pre-empts state-law design-defect claims. CVSG: 12/9/2019.
|Date||Proceedings and Orders |
|Mar 01 2019||Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due April 3, 2019)|
|Mar 06 2019||Waiver of right of respondent Jill Sikkelee to respond filed.|
|Mar 12 2019||Blanket Consent filed by Petitioner, Avco Corporation.|
|Mar 19 2019||Blanket Consent filed by Respondent, Jill Sikkelee|
|Mar 20 2019||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/12/2019.|
|Mar 21 2019||Response Requested. (Due April 22, 2019)|
|Apr 16 2019||Motion to extend the time to file a response from April 22, 2019 to May 22, 2019, submitted to The Clerk.|
|Apr 17 2019||Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including May 22, 2019.|
|Apr 19 2019||Brief amicus curiae of Experimental Aircraft Association, Inc. filed.|
|Apr 22 2019||Brief amici curiae of Product Liability Advisory Council, Inc., et al. filed.|
|Apr 22 2019||Brief amicus curiae of Garmin International, Inc. filed.|
|Apr 22 2019||Brief amicus curiae of Aerospace Industries Association of America, Inc. filed.|
|Apr 22 2019||Brief amicus curiae of Airbus Americas, Inc. filed.|
|Apr 22 2019||Brief amicus curiae of General Aviation Manufacturers Association filed. (To Be Recovered)|
|Apr 22 2019||Brief amicus curiae of DRI - The Voice of the Defense Bar filed.|
|May 22 2019||Brief of respondent Jill Sikkelee in opposition filed.|
|May 30 2019||Letter from counsel for petitioner waiving the 14-day waiting period under Rule 15.5 filed.|
|Jun 04 2019||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/20/2019.|
|Jun 04 2019||Reply of petitioner Avco Corporation filed. (Distributed)|
|Jun 24 2019||The Solicitor General is invited to file a brief in this case expressing the views of the United States.|
|Dec 09 2019||Brief amicus curiae of United States filed.|
|Dec 23 2019||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/10/2020.|
|Dec 23 2019||Supplemental brief of respondent Jill Sikkelee filed.|
|Dec 23 2019||Supplemental brief of petitioner Avco Corporation filed.|
|Jan 13 2020||Petition DENIED.|
NEW: SCOTUS adds one new case to its docket for next term: Hemphill v. New York, a criminal-procedure case about the interaction between hearsay rules and the right of defendants to confront witnesses against them. Still no action on major petitions involving guns and abortion.
The court will release orders at 9:30 a.m. EDT followed by oral argument in two cases.
First, whether Alaska Native regional and village corporations are “Indian Tribes” for purposes of CARES Act Covid-related relief.
By @StanfordLaw’s Gregory Ablavsky.
Are Alaska Native corporations Indian tribes? A multimillion-dollar question - SCOTUSblog
Are Alaska Native corporations — special corporations that Congress created in 1971 when it resolved Native claims ...
It's official: In the first-ever SCOTUS bracketology tournament, our readers have chosen CHIEF JUSTICE EARL WARREN as the greatest justice in history. The author of Brown v. Board, Loving v. Virginia, and Miranda v. Arizona defeated top-seeded John Marshall in the final round.
We've reached the final round of SCOTUS bracketology, and two illustrious chief justices are facing off for the championship. One wrote Marbury v. Madison. The other wrote Brown v. Board. Our full write-up on both finalists is here: https://www.scotusblog.com/2021/04/the-great-chief-and-the-super-chief-a-final-showdown-in-supreme-court-march-madness/
Cast your vote below!
NEW: The Supreme Court will issue opinion(s?) next Thursday April 22. We’re still waiting on decisions in the ACA case and Fulton v. City of Philadelphia about religious liberty and LGBT rights.
Four Democrats unveiled legislation today to expand the size of the Supreme Court from nine justices to 13 -- but Democratic leaders in both the House and Senate quickly threw cold water on the proposal.
Here's our report from @jamesromoser:
Bill to enlarge the Supreme Court faces dim prospects in Congress - SCOTUSblog
Four congressional Democrats introduced legislation Thursday to expand the number of seats on the Supreme Court from ...
We're so excited about our April 15 Live Webinar (w/ @HarvardACS & @HarvardFedSoc), Covering the Court, featuring an all-star lineup of panelists @jduffyrice, @katieleebarlow, @whignewtons, & @stevenmazie! _👩⚖️👩⚖️👩⚖️👨⚖️👨⚖️👨⚖️👨⚖️👨⚖️👨⚖️_ Register here ➡️ https://harvard.zoom.us/webinar/register/WN_k_b_9IPBQ_GV37rpsjF9kw
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.