|Docket No.||Op. Below||Argument||Opinion||Vote||Author||Term|
|16-413||3d Cir.||N/A||N/A||N/A||N/A||OT 2016|
Issue: Whether the approval of a global class-action settlement of claims against the National Football League stemming from current and future brain injuries is consistent with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 23's adequacy-of-representation requirement and due process.
|Date||Proceedings and Orders |
|Aug 18 2016||Application (16A186) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from August 30, 2016 to October 17, 2016, submitted to Justice Alito.|
|Aug 19 2016||Response to application from respondent Shawn Wooden, et al. filed.|
|Aug 22 2016||Application (16A186) granted by Justice Alito extending the time to file until September 19, 2016.|
|Sep 8 2016||Application (16A186) to extend further the time from September 19, 2016 to October 3, 2016, submitted to Justice Alito.|
|Sep 12 2016||Application (16A186) granted by Justice Alito extending the time to file until September 26, 2016. No further extensions will be granted for any reason.|
|Sep 26 2016||Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due October 31, 2016)|
|Oct 11 2016||Order extending time to file response to petition to and including November 2, 2016.|
|Oct 26 2016||Brief amicus curiae of Brain Injury Association of America filed.|
|Oct 27 2016||Order further extending time to file response to petition to and including November 7, 2016.|
|Oct 31 2016||Brief amici curiae of 135 Former National Football League Players filed.|
|Oct 31 2016||Brief amicus curiae of Public Citizen, Inc. filed.|
|Nov 4 2016||Brief of respondents The National Football League and NFL Properties, LLC in opposition filed. VIDED.|
|Nov 4 2016||Brief of respondents Turner, et al. in opposition filed. VIDED.|
|Nov 21 2016||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of December 9, 2016.|
|Nov 21 2016||Reply of petitioners Raymond Armstrong, et al. filed. (Distributed)|
|Nov 22 2016||Supplemental brief of respondents Turner, et al. filed. VIDED. (Distributed)|
|Dec 12 2016||Petition DENIED.|
Just in: The next Supreme Court opinion day will be next Monday. The court expects to release one or more opinions in argued cases from the current term.
End of an era: Here is NBC News prez Noah Oppenheim's memo about Pete Williams' plan to retire this summer
The Supreme Court sides with Sen. Ted Cruz in his First Amendment challenge to a federal campaign-finance law that limits how and when candidates can recoup loans that they make to their own campaigns. The vote is 6-3 along ideological lines.
In an immigration case, SCOTUS rules 5-4 that federal courts do NOT have jurisdiction to review certain executive-branch factual findings that determine whether non-citizens are eligible for "adjustment of status." Those findings can dictate whether a person is deported.
SCOTUS agrees to take up two new cases: Jones v. Hendrix (a habeas corpus case) and SEC v. Cochran (a case about the power of district courts to hear challenges to the constitutionality of the SEC's administrative law proceedings). Full order list here: https://www.supremecourt.gov/orders/courtorders/051622zor_hgcj.pdf
We're live now on SCOTUSblog's homepage or at https://www.scotusblog.com/2022/05/announcement-of-orders-and-opinions-for-monday-may-16/
Today at SCOTUS: The court will issue one or more opinions in argued cases at 10 a.m. EDT. But first, orders on pending petitions at 9:30. We'll fire up our live blog at 9:25 to break it all down and answer your questions. Grab some ☕️ and come join us: https://www.scotusblog.com/2022/05/announcement-of-orders-and-opinions-for-monday-may-16/