|Docket No.||Op. Below||Argument||Opinion||Vote||Author||Term|
|11-597||Fed. Cir.||Oct 3, 2012||Dec 4, 2012||8-0||Ginsburg||OT 2012|
Holding: Recurrent flooding that is induced by the government and temporary in duration is not automatically exempt from liability under the Takings Clause. (Kagan, J., recused.)
Judgment: Reversed and remanded, 8-0, in an opinion by Justice Ginsburg on December 4, 2012.
|Date||Proceedings and Orders |
|Nov 9 2011||Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due December 16, 2011)|
|Dec 6 2011||Order extending time to file response to petition to and including January 17, 2012.|
|Dec 9 2011||Brief amici curiae of National Association of Home Builders, et al. filed.|
|Dec 15 2011||Brief amici curiae of Pacific Legal Foundation, and Cato Institute filed.|
|Dec 15 2011||Brief amici curiae of Arkansas, et al. filed.|
|Dec 16 2011||Brief amicus curiae of Association of Fish & Wildlife Agencies filed.|
|Jan 13 2012||Order further extending time to file response to petition to and including March 1, 2012.|
|Mar 1 2012||Brief of respondent United States in opposition filed.|
|Mar 8 2012||Reply of petitioner Arkansas Game & Fish Commission filed.|
|Mar 14 2012||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of March 30, 2012.|
|Apr 2 2012||Petition GRANTED. Justice Kagan took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.|
|Apr 23 2012||Consent to the filing of amicus curiae briefs, in support of either party or of neither party, received from the counsel for the respondent.|
|May 7 2012||The time to file the joint appendix and petitioner's brief on the merits is extended to and including June 22, 2012.|
|May 7 2012||The time to file respondent's brief on the merits is extended to and including August 24, 2012.|
|Jun 18 2012||The time to file the joint appendix and petitioner's brief on the merits is further extended to and including June 27, 2012.|
|Jun 18 2012||The time to file respondent's brief on the merits is further extended to and including August 27, 2012.|
|Jun 27 2012||Joint appendix filed. (Joint appendix in 3 volumes). (Statement of costs filed)|
|Jun 27 2012||Brief of petitioner Arkansas Game & Fish Commission filed.|
|Jul 3 2012||Brief amici curiae of National Federation of Independent Business Small Business Legal Center, et al. filed.|
|Jul 3 2012||Brief amici curiae of Pacific Legal Foundation, et al. filed.|
|Jul 5 2012||Brief amicus curiae of Owners' Counsel of America filed.|
|Jul 5 2012||Brief amici curiae of Wolfsen Land & Cattle Co., et al. filed.|
|Jul 5 2012||Brief amici curiae of Washington Legal Foundation, et al. filed.|
|Jul 13 2012||CIRCULATED.|
|Jul 23 2012||SET FOR ARGUMENT ON Wednesday, October 3, 2012|
|Jul 31 2012||Record received from U.S.C.A. for Federal Circuit. (1 box)|
|Aug 27 2012||Brief of respondent United States filed. (Distributed)|
|Aug 29 2012||Record from U.S. Court of Federal Claims is electronic.|
|Aug 30 2012||Motion for leave to file amici brief filed by professors of law teaching in the property law and water rights fields.|
|Sep 4 2012||Brief amici curiae of International Municipal Lawyers Association, et al. filed.|
|Sep 19 2012||Reply of petitioner Arkansas Game & Fish Commission filed. (Distributed)|
|Sep 25 2012||Motion for leave to file amici brief filed by professors of law teaching in the property law and water rights fields GRANTED. Justice Kagan took no part in the consideration or decision of this motion.|
|Oct 3 2012||Argued. For petitioner: James F. Goodhart, Little Rock, Ark. For respondent: Edwin S. Kneedler, Deputy Solicitor General, Department of Justice, Washington, D. C.|
|Dec 4 2012||Judgment REVERSED and case REMANDED. Ginsburg, J., delivered the opinion of the Court, in which all other Members joined, except Kagan, J., who took no part in the consideration or decision of the case.|
|Jan 7 2013||JUDGMENT ISSUED.|
|Jul 5 2013||Record returned to U.S.C.A. for Federal Circuit.|
How has COVID-19 changed the Supreme Court? And are any of those changes worth keeping? Today we launch a symposium examining those questions.
First up, a piece from @stevenmazie on how to reform oral arguments after the pandemic.
The court after COVID: A recipe for oral argument reform - SCOTUSblog
The Supreme Court has not yet announced whether it will return to normal operations when the 2021-22 term begins ...
NEW shadow-docket case: New York landlords ask SCOTUS for an emergency order to prevent the state from continuing to enforce its COVID-related eviction moratorium. They say the moratorium "runs roughshod" over their constitutional rights.
Filing here: https://www.scotusblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/07/21A8-1.pdf
New on the shadow docket: Florida seeks an emergency order blocking CDC policies that substantially limit cruise ships from sailing.
Florida asks #SCOTUS to block, pending appeal, CDC restrictions imposed on cruise industry b/c of COVID-19 pandemic: https://www.scotusblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/07/21A5.pdf
NEW: Mississippi formally asks the Supreme Court to overturn its landmark abortion case, Roe v. Wade, in latest court filing. https://www.supremecourt.gov/DocketPDF/19/19-1392/184703/20210722161332385_19-1392BriefForPetitioners.pdf
Biden’s SCOTUS reform commission met yesterday and discussed several reform ideas including adding justices and adopting a formal code of ethics.
Term limits emerged as a popular idea. But how to implement it — via statute or constitutional amendment?
Term limits emerge as popular proposal at latest meeting of court-reform commission - SCOTUSblog
The Presidential Commission on the Supreme Court reconvened on Tuesday to hear from a new set of experts on vari...
I really enjoyed getting to chat with the incomparable @AHoweBlogger about (1) why #SCOTUS's "shadow docket" *is* a big deal; (2) why it's so hard to figure out how to include it in broader assessments of the Justices' work; and (3) some possible ways to include it going forward. https://twitter.com/SCOTUSblog/status/1417545384314949635
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.