|Docket No.||Op. Below||Argument||Opinion||Vote||Author||Term|
|11-597||Fed. Cir.||Oct 3, 2012||Dec 4, 2012||8-0||Ginsburg||OT 2012|
Holding: Recurrent flooding that is induced by the government and temporary in duration is not automatically exempt from liability under the Takings Clause. (Kagan, J., recused.)
Judgment: Reversed and remanded, 8-0, in an opinion by Justice Ginsburg on December 4, 2012.
|Date||Proceedings and Orders |
|Nov 9 2011||Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due December 16, 2011)|
|Dec 6 2011||Order extending time to file response to petition to and including January 17, 2012.|
|Dec 9 2011||Brief amici curiae of National Association of Home Builders, et al. filed.|
|Dec 15 2011||Brief amici curiae of Pacific Legal Foundation, and Cato Institute filed.|
|Dec 15 2011||Brief amici curiae of Arkansas, et al. filed.|
|Dec 16 2011||Brief amicus curiae of Association of Fish & Wildlife Agencies filed.|
|Jan 13 2012||Order further extending time to file response to petition to and including March 1, 2012.|
|Mar 1 2012||Brief of respondent United States in opposition filed.|
|Mar 8 2012||Reply of petitioner Arkansas Game & Fish Commission filed.|
|Mar 14 2012||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of March 30, 2012.|
|Apr 2 2012||Petition GRANTED. Justice Kagan took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.|
|Apr 23 2012||Consent to the filing of amicus curiae briefs, in support of either party or of neither party, received from the counsel for the respondent.|
|May 7 2012||The time to file the joint appendix and petitioner's brief on the merits is extended to and including June 22, 2012.|
|May 7 2012||The time to file respondent's brief on the merits is extended to and including August 24, 2012.|
|Jun 18 2012||The time to file the joint appendix and petitioner's brief on the merits is further extended to and including June 27, 2012.|
|Jun 18 2012||The time to file respondent's brief on the merits is further extended to and including August 27, 2012.|
|Jun 27 2012||Joint appendix filed. (Joint appendix in 3 volumes). (Statement of costs filed)|
|Jun 27 2012||Brief of petitioner Arkansas Game & Fish Commission filed.|
|Jul 3 2012||Brief amici curiae of National Federation of Independent Business Small Business Legal Center, et al. filed.|
|Jul 3 2012||Brief amici curiae of Pacific Legal Foundation, et al. filed.|
|Jul 5 2012||Brief amicus curiae of Owners' Counsel of America filed.|
|Jul 5 2012||Brief amici curiae of Wolfsen Land & Cattle Co., et al. filed.|
|Jul 5 2012||Brief amici curiae of Washington Legal Foundation, et al. filed.|
|Jul 13 2012||CIRCULATED.|
|Jul 23 2012||SET FOR ARGUMENT ON Wednesday, October 3, 2012|
|Jul 31 2012||Record received from U.S.C.A. for Federal Circuit. (1 box)|
|Aug 27 2012||Brief of respondent United States filed. (Distributed)|
|Aug 29 2012||Record from U.S. Court of Federal Claims is electronic.|
|Aug 30 2012||Motion for leave to file amici brief filed by professors of law teaching in the property law and water rights fields.|
|Sep 4 2012||Brief amici curiae of International Municipal Lawyers Association, et al. filed.|
|Sep 19 2012||Reply of petitioner Arkansas Game & Fish Commission filed. (Distributed)|
|Sep 25 2012||Motion for leave to file amici brief filed by professors of law teaching in the property law and water rights fields GRANTED. Justice Kagan took no part in the consideration or decision of this motion.|
|Oct 3 2012||Argued. For petitioner: James F. Goodhart, Little Rock, Ark. For respondent: Edwin S. Kneedler, Deputy Solicitor General, Department of Justice, Washington, D. C.|
|Dec 4 2012||Judgment REVERSED and case REMANDED. Ginsburg, J., delivered the opinion of the Court, in which all other Members joined, except Kagan, J., who took no part in the consideration or decision of the case.|
|Jan 7 2013||JUDGMENT ISSUED.|
|Jul 5 2013||Record returned to U.S.C.A. for Federal Circuit.|
It's official: In the first-ever SCOTUS bracketology tournament, our readers have chosen CHIEF JUSTICE EARL WARREN as the greatest justice in history. The author of Brown v. Board, Loving v. Virginia, and Miranda v. Arizona defeated top-seeded John Marshall in the final round.
We've reached the final round of SCOTUS bracketology, and two illustrious chief justices are facing off for the championship. One wrote Marbury v. Madison. The other wrote Brown v. Board. Our full write-up on both finalists is here: https://www.scotusblog.com/2021/04/the-great-chief-and-the-super-chief-a-final-showdown-in-supreme-court-march-madness/
Cast your vote below!
NEW: The Supreme Court will issue opinion(s?) next Thursday April 22. We’re still waiting on decisions in the ACA case and Fulton v. City of Philadelphia about religious liberty and LGBT rights.
Four Democrats unveiled legislation today to expand the size of the Supreme Court from nine justices to 13 -- but Democratic leaders in both the House and Senate quickly threw cold water on the proposal.
Here's our report from @jamesromoser:
Bill to enlarge the Supreme Court faces dim prospects in Congress - SCOTUSblog
Four congressional Democrats introduced legislation Thursday to expand the number of seats on the Supreme Court from ...
We're so excited about our April 15 Live Webinar (w/ @HarvardACS & @HarvardFedSoc), Covering the Court, featuring an all-star lineup of panelists @jduffyrice, @katieleebarlow, @whignewtons, & @stevenmazie! _👩⚖️👩⚖️👩⚖️👨⚖️👨⚖️👨⚖️👨⚖️👨⚖️👨⚖️_ Register here ➡️ https://harvard.zoom.us/webinar/register/WN_k_b_9IPBQ_GV37rpsjF9kw
Senator Markey (D-Ma) is delivering remarks right now in front of the Supreme Court introducing the Judiciary Act of 2021 to expand the court to 13 justices. He’s flanked by Chairman of House Judiciary, Jerry Nadler (D-NY), and Hank Johnson (D-Ga).
We've reached the final round of SCOTUS bracketology, and two illustrious chief justices are facing off for the championship. One wrote Marbury v. Madison. The other wrote Brown v. Board. Our full write-up on both finalists is here:
Cast your vote below!
The “great chief” and the “super chief”: A final showdown in Supreme Court March Madness - SCOTUSblog
Forget Ali vs. Frazier, Celtics vs. Lakers, or Evert vs. Navratilova. It’s time for Marshall vs. Warren. After...