Editor's Note :

close editor's note Editor's Note :

Since October, SCOTUSblog has been outside the Supreme Court collecting data and stories from people who traveled to see oral arguments in person during the 2019 term. Click to follow along with the month-long release of our Courtroom Access project.

Arizona v. Martin

Pending petition
Docket No. Op. Below Argument Opinion Vote Author Term
19-605 Ariz. TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD

Disclosure: Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys contribute to this blog in various capacities, is among the counsel to the respondent in this case.

Issue: Whether, when a jury expressly states it is “unable to agree” on a defendant’s guilt for a greater offense and convicts the defendant of a lesser offense, and the defendant successfully appeals his conviction, the hung-jury rule permits retrial of the greater offense or Green v. United States instead bars retrial of that offense.

SCOTUSblog Coverage

DateProceedings and Orders (key to color coding)
Nov 07 2019Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due December 12, 2019)
Dec 04 2019Waiver of right of respondent Philip Martin to respond filed.
Dec 18 2019DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/10/2020.
Jan 06 2020Response Requested. (Due February 5, 2020)
Jan 09 2020Motion to extend the time to file a response from February 5, 2020 to March 6, 2020, submitted to The Clerk.
Jan 13 2020Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including March 6, 2020.
Feb 05 2020Brief amici curiae of Kentucky, et al. filed.
Feb 20 2020Motion to extend the time to file a response from March 6, 2020 to April 6, 2020, submitted to The Clerk.
Feb 24 2020Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is further extended to and including April 6, 2020.
 
Share:
Term Snapshot
At a Glance
Awards