|Docket No.||Op. Below||Argument||Opinion||Vote||Author||Term|
|18-1455||D.C. Cir.||N/A||N/A||N/A||N/A||OT 2019|
Issues: (1) Whether the Washington Metropolitan Transit Authority’s policy of refusing to accept advertisements that promote or oppose religion or reflect a religious perspective violates the First Amendment; and (2) whether that discrimination against religious speech violates the Religious Freedom Restoration Act.
|Date||Proceedings and Orders |
|Feb 27 2019||Application (18A880) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from March 21, 2019 to April 20, 2019, submitted to The Chief Justice.|
|Mar 01 2019||Application (18A880) granted by The Chief Justice extending the time to file until April 20, 2019.|
|Mar 21 2019||Application (18A880) to extend further the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from April 20, 2019 to May 20, 2019, submitted to The Chief Justice.|
|Mar 22 2019||Application (18A880) granted by The Chief Justice extending the time to file until May 20, 2019.|
|May 20 2019||Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due June 21, 2019)|
|May 29 2019||Blanket Consent filed by Petitioner, Archdiocese of Washington, a corporation sole.|
|Jun 07 2019||Motion to extend the time to file a response from June 21, 2019 to July 22, 2019, submitted to The Clerk.|
|Jun 11 2019||Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including July 22, 2019.|
|Jun 20 2019||Amicus brief of Foundation for Moral Law not accepted for filing. (Corrected version to be submitted -- June 20, 2019)|
|Jun 20 2019||Brief amicus curiae of Foundation for Moral Law filed.|
|Jun 21 2019||Brief amici curiae of Christian Legal Society, et al. filed.|
|Jun 21 2019||Brief amici curiae of National Association of Evangelicals, et al. filed.|
|Jul 22 2019||Brief of respondents Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority, et al. in opposition filed.|
|Aug 06 2019||Reply of petitioner Archdiocese of Washington, a corporation sole filed.|
|Aug 07 2019||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/1/2019.|
|Sep 26 2019||Supplemental brief of petitioner Archdiocese of Washington, a corporation sole filed. (Distributed)|
|Feb 19 2020||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/6/2020.|
|Mar 16 2020||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/20/2020.|
|Mar 23 2020||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/27/2020.|
|Mar 30 2020||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/3/2020.|
|Apr 06 2020||Petition DENIED. Justice Kavanaugh took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition. Statement of Justice Gorsuch, with whom Justice Thomas joins, respecting the denial of certiorari. (Detached Opinion)|
NEW: SCOTUS adds one new case to its docket for next term: Hemphill v. New York, a criminal-procedure case about the interaction between hearsay rules and the right of defendants to confront witnesses against them. Still no action on major petitions involving guns and abortion.
The court will release orders at 9:30 a.m. EDT followed by oral argument in two cases.
First, whether Alaska Native regional and village corporations are “Indian Tribes” for purposes of CARES Act Covid-related relief.
By @StanfordLaw’s Gregory Ablavsky.
Are Alaska Native corporations Indian tribes? A multimillion-dollar question - SCOTUSblog
Are Alaska Native corporations — special corporations that Congress created in 1971 when it resolved Native claims ...
It's official: In the first-ever SCOTUS bracketology tournament, our readers have chosen CHIEF JUSTICE EARL WARREN as the greatest justice in history. The author of Brown v. Board, Loving v. Virginia, and Miranda v. Arizona defeated top-seeded John Marshall in the final round.
We've reached the final round of SCOTUS bracketology, and two illustrious chief justices are facing off for the championship. One wrote Marbury v. Madison. The other wrote Brown v. Board. Our full write-up on both finalists is here: https://www.scotusblog.com/2021/04/the-great-chief-and-the-super-chief-a-final-showdown-in-supreme-court-march-madness/
Cast your vote below!
NEW: The Supreme Court will issue opinion(s?) next Thursday April 22. We’re still waiting on decisions in the ACA case and Fulton v. City of Philadelphia about religious liberty and LGBT rights.
Four Democrats unveiled legislation today to expand the size of the Supreme Court from nine justices to 13 -- but Democratic leaders in both the House and Senate quickly threw cold water on the proposal.
Here's our report from @jamesromoser:
Bill to enlarge the Supreme Court faces dim prospects in Congress - SCOTUSblog
Four congressional Democrats introduced legislation Thursday to expand the number of seats on the Supreme Court from ...
We're so excited about our April 15 Live Webinar (w/ @HarvardACS & @HarvardFedSoc), Covering the Court, featuring an all-star lineup of panelists @jduffyrice, @katieleebarlow, @whignewtons, & @stevenmazie! _👩⚖️👩⚖️👩⚖️👨⚖️👨⚖️👨⚖️👨⚖️👨⚖️👨⚖️_ Register here ➡️ https://harvard.zoom.us/webinar/register/WN_k_b_9IPBQ_GV37rpsjF9kw
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.